Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Disingenuous Argument (in more simple terms, FALSE argument) [View all]iiibbb
(1,448 posts)37. of a non-issue
Even if some morons are claiming equivalence, the 223 isn't even legal to hunt large game with because it isn't lethal enough.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
Disingenuous Argument (in more simple terms, FALSE argument) [View all]
Dog Gone at Penigma
Feb 2013
OP
Who makes that argument? I have never seen it made in serious conversation
ProgressiveProfessor
Feb 2013
#6
me either ... never heard this claim in Any Conversation, serious or otherwise - Not to say that I
Tuesday Afternoon
Feb 2013
#10
As others have said, I doubt anyone has ever seriously claimed that the two rounds
petronius
Feb 2013
#19
actually there are more of these kinds of claims than you would expect
Dog Gone at Penigma
Feb 2013
#25
that there are a lot of ignorant voices speaking as expert in the gun control debates
Dog Gone at Penigma
Feb 2013
#31
Except that a surprising number of people ARE claiming all .22 cal is essentially the same
Dog Gone at Penigma
Feb 2013
#30