Gun control hypocrisy at its best

[gejohnston]

62. a gun law would not have prevented it

the post hoc ergo propter hoc international comparisons aside, there is no evidence that gun laws save lives or reduce crime. Should a law abiding rural person be blamed for drug dealers killing each other in Denver or Chicago? That is what it amounts to. Who puts those guns in their hands and gives them an economic incentive to kill each other? Drug users. That makes bong owners more responsible for gun violence than rural or suburban gun owners.

You are also operating from a false premise, rural CO residents are not trying to force anything on you. You are forcing it on them, that gives your side the burden of trying to prove the validity of your point. Simply claiming "we don't feel you need one" isn't a valid reason.