Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Does the Group need/want a host? [View all]krispos42
(49,445 posts)4. Heh, I just PMed Skinner and got back a link to the new process
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1013434
[div class=excerpt style=background:#AFEEEE]With that in mind, there may be some Groups where it might make sense to leave the position of Host vacant:
If your group is dedicated to a non-controversial topic, then there is probably no harm in assigning someone as a Host. You are unlikely to need someone to lock threads or block people out of the group, but it might be useful to have someone who can take ownership of the group.
If your group is a "Safe Haven" where only one viewpoint is welcome, then you should probably assign a Host to help run the group. It is likely that you will need a Host to lock off-topic threads and block out people who disagree with the purpose of the group.
If your group plays host to open debate on a particular topic, and welcomes a wide range of viewpoints, then the choice might not be so simple. If you select a Host, it needs to be someone who is trusted to be fair by people holding a wide range of viewpoints. You may decide that it is better not to assign anyone as the Host of your group, to avoid the risk that that person might use their power to benefit a particular viewpoint.
I think the Gungeon is the last one. Just a bit.
[div class=excerpt style=background:#AFEEEE]If the members of your group decide to select a Host, then you must decide who will serve as the first Host. The DU Administrators will assign ONLY ONE host to each Group, and then it is the responsibility of that Host to select other members of the Host Team (if anyone else wishes to serve).
Hopefully in most Groups, selecting a first Host will be a simple matter of awarding the job to the first person who posts in the Group to volunteer for the job. If more than one person is interested, then you need to discuss the choice of Host amongst yourselves until you come to some sort of consensus regarding who should have the job.
So we need consensus on a first Host, who then promotes other hosts as needed.
I'd like to volunteer to be first Host. I have 2 years of mod experience, some of which was in the Gungeon, and I believe I was fair to all sides and all players when I did so.
</end stump speech>
[div class=excerpt style=background:#AFEEEE]With that in mind, there may be some Groups where it might make sense to leave the position of Host vacant:
If your group is dedicated to a non-controversial topic, then there is probably no harm in assigning someone as a Host. You are unlikely to need someone to lock threads or block people out of the group, but it might be useful to have someone who can take ownership of the group.
If your group is a "Safe Haven" where only one viewpoint is welcome, then you should probably assign a Host to help run the group. It is likely that you will need a Host to lock off-topic threads and block out people who disagree with the purpose of the group.
If your group plays host to open debate on a particular topic, and welcomes a wide range of viewpoints, then the choice might not be so simple. If you select a Host, it needs to be someone who is trusted to be fair by people holding a wide range of viewpoints. You may decide that it is better not to assign anyone as the Host of your group, to avoid the risk that that person might use their power to benefit a particular viewpoint.
I think the Gungeon is the last one. Just a bit.
[div class=excerpt style=background:#AFEEEE]If the members of your group decide to select a Host, then you must decide who will serve as the first Host. The DU Administrators will assign ONLY ONE host to each Group, and then it is the responsibility of that Host to select other members of the Host Team (if anyone else wishes to serve).
Hopefully in most Groups, selecting a first Host will be a simple matter of awarding the job to the first person who posts in the Group to volunteer for the job. If more than one person is interested, then you need to discuss the choice of Host amongst yourselves until you come to some sort of consensus regarding who should have the job.
- If you want to serve as a Host of a particular Group, the first thing you need to do is post in that group to let the members of that group know you are interested in serving as the Host. If a consensus is reached and you are chosen for the job, then -- and only then -- you can report back to this thread and let me know.
- Post a reply in this thread telling me which group you have been selected to Host. Include a direct link to your post in the group where you want to serve. I need that link in order to give you host powers.
- I will only assign ONE host to each group. After that first host has been assigned, then that first host has the power to grant host status to anyone else. So, if a host is already assigned to a group, then you need to contact that host to become a host.
So we need consensus on a first Host, who then promotes other hosts as needed.
I'd like to volunteer to be first Host. I have 2 years of mod experience, some of which was in the Gungeon, and I believe I was fair to all sides and all players when I did so.
</end stump speech>
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'm not a denizen of the Gungeon - but kicking so your fellow citizens see your post.
gateley
Dec 2011
#1
Perhaps a few more "Ayes" would be in order, although there's no real definition
petronius
Dec 2011
#11
I haven't seen any way that they could; I think the community standards referred to by
petronius
Dec 2011
#21
I understand that in the alert, you write your own note about why you're alerting
krispos42
Dec 2011
#22
Thanks for the feedback. I guess I think you can be pro-gun but against some gun proposals. Like....
Logical
Dec 2011
#32
I think if it became a problem with the first Host, and the first Host refused to retire...
krispos42
Dec 2011
#33
I don't think those committees are really analogous to the Host's duties, though.
krispos42
Dec 2011
#45