Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

krispos42

(49,445 posts)
4. Heh, I just PMed Skinner and got back a link to the new process
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 01:09 AM
Dec 2011
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1013434

[div class=excerpt style=background:#AFEEEE]With that in mind, there may be some Groups where it might make sense to leave the position of Host vacant:

• If your group is dedicated to a non-controversial topic, then there is probably no harm in assigning someone as a Host. You are unlikely to need someone to lock threads or block people out of the group, but it might be useful to have someone who can take ownership of the group.
• If your group is a "Safe Haven" where only one viewpoint is welcome, then you should probably assign a Host to help run the group. It is likely that you will need a Host to lock off-topic threads and block out people who disagree with the purpose of the group.
• If your group plays host to open debate on a particular topic, and welcomes a wide range of viewpoints, then the choice might not be so simple. If you select a Host, it needs to be someone who is trusted to be fair by people holding a wide range of viewpoints. You may decide that it is better not to assign anyone as the Host of your group, to avoid the risk that that person might use their power to benefit a particular viewpoint.

I think the Gungeon is the last one. Just a bit.





[div class=excerpt style=background:#AFEEEE]If the members of your group decide to select a Host, then you must decide who will serve as the first Host. The DU Administrators will assign ONLY ONE host to each Group, and then it is the responsibility of that Host to select other members of the Host Team (if anyone else wishes to serve).

Hopefully in most Groups, selecting a first Host will be a simple matter of awarding the job to the first person who posts in the Group to volunteer for the job. If more than one person is interested, then you need to discuss the choice of Host amongst yourselves until you come to some sort of consensus regarding who should have the job.

  1. If you want to serve as a Host of a particular Group, the first thing you need to do is post in that group to let the members of that group know you are interested in serving as the Host. If a consensus is reached and you are chosen for the job, then -- and only then -- you can report back to this thread and let me know.
  2. Post a reply in this thread telling me which group you have been selected to Host. Include a direct link to your post in the group where you want to serve. I need that link in order to give you host powers.
  3. I will only assign ONE host to each group. After that first host has been assigned, then that first host has the power to grant host status to anyone else. So, if a host is already assigned to a group, then you need to contact that host to become a host.




So we need consensus on a first Host, who then promotes other hosts as needed.



I'd like to volunteer to be first Host. I have 2 years of mod experience, some of which was in the Gungeon, and I believe I was fair to all sides and all players when I did so.

</end stump speech>

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Does the Group need/want a host? [View all] petronius Dec 2011 OP
I'm not a denizen of the Gungeon - but kicking so your fellow citizens see your post. gateley Dec 2011 #1
maybe you and Krispos should shoot it out? Tuesday Afternoon Dec 2011 #2
I was gonna nominate you too, until I saw you'd volunteered for another group petronius Dec 2011 #3
moi? Tuesday Afternoon Dec 2011 #5
Heh, I just PMed Skinner and got back a link to the new process krispos42 Dec 2011 #4
fine by me. what say you Petronius? Tuesday Afternoon Dec 2011 #6
Yes! I think Krispos would be excellent in that first slot, petronius Dec 2011 #7
my thoughts, too. agreed. Tuesday Afternoon Dec 2011 #8
Thanks krispos42 Dec 2011 #9
Perhaps a few more "Ayes" would be in order, although there's no real definition petronius Dec 2011 #11
Does side matter? It didnt so much during the trial period... krispos42 Dec 2011 #12
Side? I just meant "Aye" as in "Yea" or "Yes" or even "Yup" to your election petronius Dec 2011 #13
I meant, should we wait for input from both sides? krispos42 Dec 2011 #14
I believe the 90 day thing is only pipoman Dec 2011 #17
I re-read the post about it, and you're right... krispos42 Dec 2011 #19
I agree that you would make a good first host. pipoman Dec 2011 #16
I vote for Krispos too nt gejohnston Dec 2011 #10
I think we should discuss community standards before pipoman Dec 2011 #15
The debate here IS unique krispos42 Dec 2011 #18
Good point.. pipoman Dec 2011 #20
I haven't seen any way that they could; I think the community standards referred to by petronius Dec 2011 #21
I understand that in the alert, you write your own note about why you're alerting krispos42 Dec 2011 #22
krispos42 would make a fine Host I vote for him n/t MicaelS Dec 2011 #23
I have thought of being a host here...Any feedback...... Logical Dec 2011 #24
I'm not sure if you want this feedback.. Upton Dec 2011 #25
No issue with you saying that, thanks for the feedback, but.... Logical Dec 2011 #26
I could be wrong -- but, I think to some people Tuesday Afternoon Dec 2011 #30
Thanks for the feedback. I guess I think you can be pro-gun but against some gun proposals. Like.... Logical Dec 2011 #32
What have you said that is anti gun? Upton Dec 2011 #31
Wow, you are projecting...... Logical Dec 2011 #35
I'm not seeing how this effects pipoman Dec 2011 #36
No problem from me krispos42 Dec 2011 #27
I am 100% OK with you! No issue at all! Good luck! Logical Dec 2011 #28
For what it is worth, you seem to have a reasonable outlook on this topic. Hoyt Dec 2011 #37
Thanks! Logical Dec 2011 #38
Not necessarily krispos42 Dec 2011 #40
I agree. pipoman Dec 2011 #42
I think a person with a "reasonable outlook" can do that just fine. Hoyt Dec 2011 #43
a "reasonable outlook" on gun laws shouldn't be a consideration. krispos42 Dec 2011 #44
Another concern pipoman Dec 2011 #29
I think if it became a problem with the first Host, and the first Host refused to retire... krispos42 Dec 2011 #33
I don't disagree about your history or doubt your ability pipoman Dec 2011 #34
Maybe we should think about what a host would/could do within the group petronius Dec 2011 #39
I think 2 and 3 are interesting.. pipoman Dec 2011 #41
I don't think those committees are really analogous to the Host's duties, though. krispos42 Dec 2011 #45
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Does the Group need/want ...»Reply #4