Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Bill suggests anger management classes for those purchasing ammo [View all]ThatPoetGuy
(1,747 posts)78. "Hobby." You keep using that word.

Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
125 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Bill suggests anger management classes for those purchasing ammo [View all]
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2013
OP
The chances of this bill passing in Florida are less than the chance that I will win ...
spin
Mar 2013
#2
Oh, no doubt. I was simply amused to see an alleged 'progressive' attempt to employ...
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2013
#3
you think only 50 children die a year from gunshot wounds in this country????
VanillaRhapsody
Mar 2013
#64
but I will defer to your constraint.....lets play another round shall we?
VanillaRhapsody
Mar 2013
#73
So now saying that we need better gun control is an extremist position?
VanillaRhapsody
Mar 2013
#81
I don't think forcing a woman to be vaginally penetrated for a medical procedure
ZombieHorde
Mar 2013
#11
Not so typical....those on the left are generally better read than many of those I know on the right
VanillaRhapsody
Mar 2013
#93
Yeah unless the gun dealer is robbed...then he can destroy the records right???/
VanillaRhapsody
Mar 2013
#95
pro-RKBA "logic": sitting in a classroom for two hours = an invasive probe inserted in a woman's
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#13
You lot are no different from the fetus fetishists in thinking your particular infringement...
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2013
#16
You go right on doubling down on that offensive and frankly sexist comparison between a woman having
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#17
I've been pointing out the similarities between gun Prohibitionists and abortion foes for years:
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2013
#18
There are no "similarities" between an invasive procedure in a woman's body and some clownish
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#19
"Bobo who likes to play with popguns". Gotta get your culture war on, eh?
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2013
#21
It means: You don't get to decide what is progressive, and what isn't.
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2013
#25
No, it doesn't: it's just a meaningless jumble of words, typed in order to deflect and obfuscate
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#29
I'd like to know if they find passing a driving test to be an equivalent invasive procedure
VanillaRhapsody
Mar 2013
#54
Tell you what: why don't you put your money where you keyboard is and post an OP in GD
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#24
And Bingo! There it is: all we're gonna get now is excuses as to why you're NOT going to post
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#30
Gun threads don't play well in GD- you are are always free to alert and play jury roulette.
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2013
#36
"Gun threads don't play well in GD" - Translation: "I'm unwilling to stand behind my convictions
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#40
And check this out, class: of the three links he provides "proving" he's been engaging in offensive,
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#20
I ridicule those that try to evade Lawrence v. Texas and Olmstead v. L. C., as well
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2013
#23
Get back with me when you're willing to stand behind your convictions and post an OP in GD
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#32
And all *your* blather is meaningless unless you alert and/or claim a TOS violation.
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2013
#37
Hey, it doesn't bother me that you are unwilling to stand behind your own stated convictions.
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#39
Hey, it doesn't bother me that you are unwilling to stand behind your own stated convictions.
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#48
Good. Put it right next to the "Zimmerman will walk thanks to SYG laws"
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2013
#38
And you're a pro-George Zimmerman poster to boot! Why am I *NOT* surprised?
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#41
There's still time to edit your #38 above. Or at least initiate a walk-back.
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#47
No need to; I need only repost something about Zimmerman that I posted in January,
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2013
#56
What irritates me is the irrational panic. I was waiting to be helped to get some premium 20 gauge
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#107
And as such a reaction is *irrational* - i.e., NOTHING I have proposed or advocated for
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#109
Wrong - my "war" is the age-old progressive, liberal struggle for enlightenment, civilization, and
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#111
Same "ol' truth and facts; same "ol' Gungeoneers fleeing the scene like vampires from a garlic grove
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#120
And here we have the Pamela Geller branch of gun control advocacy in purest ray serene
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2013
#112
What you actually "have" is a genuine progressive talking truth to a gaggle of pro-NRA shills &
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#113
Same backbeat as Pam G., just a different subject- "All *those* people are alike, and I'm merely...
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2013
#114
What you actually "have" is a genuine progressive talking truth to a gaggle of pro-NRA shills &
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#115
Hey, and BTW: have you worked up the gumption to actually stand behind your convictions PUBLICLY
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#116
So, the answer is "NO" - you have not yet worked up the courage of your convictions
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#119
I understand where you're coming from- you are upset because you fear defeat...
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2013
#122
So the answer is *still* "NO": you haven't yet worked up the courage of your convictions to post
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#123
Hey, it doesn't bother me that you are unwilling to stand behind your own stated convictions.
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#125
Sounds like it's intended solely to make a right/liberty more expensive, inconvenient,
petronius
Mar 2013
#42