Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Putting the "guns protect our democracy" argument to rest in one easy step [View all]GreenStormCloud
(12,072 posts)67. That's not the reason a revolution would fail.
Amateurs talk about tactics, professionals talk about logistics. The jet can be defeated, you just have to use the right tactics. But a lack of logistical support will kill any military. All revolutions that become a prolonged engagement have to have resupply, safe staging and training areas. They need a friendly country supporting them to give them supplies and a friendly country with a shared border to retreat to.
And a revolutionary force needs to communicate. With modern electronics intercept means listening to everything the revolution says, they will need to rely upon written messages carried on horseback, and hope the messenger doesn't get seen by a drone.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
128 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Putting the "guns protect our democracy" argument to rest in one easy step [View all]
oxbow
Mar 2013
OP
"In a fight between an AR-15 and a jet who do you think is going to win?"
holdencaufield
Mar 2013
#4
What makes you think they attend NRA meeting where they are smokinging something you wish you had in
xoom
Mar 2013
#75
"The whole government vs. the people scenario is ridiculous on its face..."
holdencaufield
Mar 2013
#13
"The whole government vs. the people scenario is ridiculous on its face." Agreed, but it may be the
AnotherMcIntosh
Mar 2013
#78
If an insurgency cut off supply lines and communications, then they might have a chance
oxbow
Mar 2013
#10
The reality is that a 2nd revolution is absurd whether its by Occupy or the Tea Baggers
ProgressiveProfessor
Mar 2013
#21
So now the "professor" is a Vietnam Vet too, eh? Let's see*: you are a "self made milllionaire"; a
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#44
Do you have any statistics or data or other evidence to prove that assertion?
JDPriestly
Mar 2013
#79
you're saying my desire to change the gun culture to one of non violence is a band aid?
CreekDog
Mar 2013
#114
if you never leave this group how do you know what i've posted on non violence?
CreekDog
Mar 2013
#119
please cite a post of mine on non violence which is a whole lot of not very much
CreekDog
Mar 2013
#121
You would have to ban and confiscate all semi-automatic firearms including handguns
hack89
Mar 2013
#84
Agreed, The Red Dawn Style Fantasies Of Self-Styled Militia Members And Zealots Is Misplaced At Best
cantbeserious
Mar 2013
#28
Don't Follow Your Point - Regardless, Defending Oneself From Drones And Other Flying Weapons
cantbeserious
Mar 2013
#32
Some aircraft...Hueys, even the Yankee are still very soft targets and the Zulu is in some
ProgressiveProfessor
Mar 2013
#36
Yeah, I noticed all those jets guided missile cruisers & tanks used by Afghan insurgents.
Eleanors38
Mar 2013
#42
Our use of technology to detect the movement of people and supplies was a great idea ...
spin
Mar 2013
#59
We may be older but hopefully we have gained a little wisdom over the years. (n/t)
spin
Mar 2013
#62
No wonder our government gets into no-win wars: They adhere to the gun-control theory of warfare.
Eleanors38
Mar 2013
#43
You got a ton of the typical Gungeon "Bring It On!" replies from our "pro gun progressives"*,
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#45
Another thoughtful, and well-reasoned reply. There's a reason why you're about the only
apocalypsehow
Mar 2013
#64
"Bring It On!"? I've seen nothing here that could be construed that way. n/t
CobblePuller
Mar 2013
#104
You are aware that just one guy with a rifle had the entire city of Los Angeles tied in knots right?
Trunk Monkey
Mar 2013
#53
The basic principle is he is now dead. And odds are any other asses who want to take on the
jmg257
Mar 2013
#57
Now, now.... don't be shoving a cold dose of reality into a warm, fuzzy delusion...
CobblePuller
Mar 2013
#105
My Favorite Wingnut has no illusions about defending democracy. His guns
Jackpine Radical
Mar 2013
#101
No, there wouldn't be enough of an uprising. We elect our officials democratically.
JaneyVee
Mar 2013
#108