Gun Control & RKBA

Ravajava

(93 posts)

20. Interesting

Reply to tortoise1956 (Reply #13)

Sat Mar 23, 2013, 12:20 PM

Mar 2013

Not sure I disagree with you to criticize you :p

I honestly forgot about magazine size restrictions, so that is certainly something else to consider.

I think an interesting case would be if someone bought a nuclear weapon and challenged the unlimited argument. If he won then I think a lot people would reconsider their views, if he lost then the unlimited reading would be discredited.

Something to ponder...

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

55 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Addressing a Conservative on Gun Control [View all] Ravajava Mar 2013 OP

First thought, it's too long Trunk Monkey Mar 2013 #1

Perhaps Ravajava Mar 2013 #2

Be nice if you actually understood the issue more than you display in the video. Clames Mar 2013 #5

Judging from the response Ravajava Mar 2013 #10

Uh huh. Clames Mar 2013 #12

It should be known Ravajava Mar 2013 #16

That's a poor interpretation. Clames Mar 2013 #17

The "modern invention" meme is easily disproved. Please read more and report back . hansberrym Mar 2013 #18

right... Ravajava Mar 2013 #19

Amend 2A out of the Constitution? LOL. GreenStormCloud Mar 2013 #23

As I said Ravajava Mar 2013 #34

What nonsense. Recent my ass. beevul Mar 2013 #26

Having read up on this Ravajava Mar 2013 #36

LOL. beevul Mar 2013 #40

2003 Ravajava Mar 2013 #41

you misunderstand Cruishank gejohnston Mar 2013 #48

In that case Ravajava Mar 2013 #50

Right up until Mcdonald became law. beevul Mar 2013 #51

that was before incorporation gejohnston Mar 2013 #52

Uhh.. beevul Mar 2013 #53

The "individual right" interpretation is the original interpretation. GreenStormCloud Mar 2013 #22

Like Ravajava Mar 2013 #35

If it takes you three hours to explain your position ... holdencaufield Mar 2013 #14

Short arguments Ravajava Mar 2013 #15

It isn't a belief, it's a fact. But your final 7 words are 100% correct. sinister minister Mar 2013 #44

Well I explained in the video the reasoning Ravajava Mar 2013 #45

By posting it down here you sure are addressing more than a few alrighty... apocalypsehow Mar 2013 #3

True Ravajava Mar 2013 #4

"conservative" vs "liberal"? A firearm-owning Democrat who all liberals in this country would AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #31

As a side Note Ravajava Mar 2013 #32

I don't know what "being pro gun" is. I know John Locke expressed it correctly re "natural rights" AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #39

It was long but interesting. The gun control supporter was the more skilled commentator... spin Mar 2013 #6

Thanks :D Ravajava Mar 2013 #7

+1 raidert05 Mar 2013 #8

Sorry, but I lost my patience. Straw Man Mar 2013 #9

I see Ravajava Mar 2013 #11

I got about 12 minutes into it tortoise1956 Mar 2013 #13

Interesting Ravajava Mar 2013 #20

if you have the money to purchase gejohnston Mar 2013 #21

So Ravajava Mar 2013 #30

We get the nuke argument down here from time to time. GreenStormCloud Mar 2013 #24

The Purpose of the Nuke Argument Ravajava Mar 2013 #33

not so sure about that gejohnston Mar 2013 #37

Hence the problem that needs fixing Ravajava Mar 2013 #42

the ATF brought it on themselves gejohnston Mar 2013 #47

What are you willing to give us that we don't already have? GreenStormCloud Mar 2013 #38

Defeating the purpose Ravajava Mar 2013 #43

If you won't give up anything, then why should we? N/T GreenStormCloud Mar 2013 #46

In politics Ravajava Mar 2013 #49

Well, to convince him he's wrong you kinda have to be right... Clames Mar 2013 #54

We have different ideas of what compromise is. GreenStormCloud Mar 2013 #55

Half a fucking hour? rl6214 Mar 2013 #25

Funny you ask Ravajava Mar 2013 #28

Thoughts? 1) Your video is too long. 2) Millions of firearm-owning Democrats are not conservatives. AnotherMcIntosh Mar 2013 #27

I have nothing against owning a gun Ravajava Mar 2013 #29