Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

DonP

(6,185 posts)
3. They get very feisty when you point that out
Mon Mar 25, 2013, 11:13 AM
Mar 2013

We've had a series of wannabe grabbers down here, claiming that the '94 ban was somehow violated when the manufacturers actually complied with the law, but still sold semi auto rifles with the required cosmetic changes.

For some odd reason they saw that as using a "loophole".

The trick is ... you're supposed to magically read their confused and ill informed minds (that proudly refuse to learn anything about the subject they want to regulate) and obey their version of the "spirit of the law" even if the law doesn't really say that.

OTOH ... it's nice that they never seem to learn and still cheer on all this fast and sloppy legislation, that always seems to come back and bite them in the ass. Style over substance seems to be the rule. "Look we have a new law restricting your guns, ha!"

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Shouldn't be surprised. Clames Mar 2013 #1
They are also realizing this provision will be heavily scrutinized by the courts Pullo Mar 2013 #2
They get very feisty when you point that out DonP Mar 2013 #3
They pat themselves on the back for a job well done.... Clames Mar 2013 #4
It seems to me their ultimate goal is not to reduce violence kudzu22 Mar 2013 #5
I think it's arrogance and condescension DonP Mar 2013 #6
opposing unlimited clips makes us anti-gunners? CreekDog Mar 2013 #7
LOL unlimited clips. Clames Mar 2013 #8
yes, unlimited clips do you have an issue with that description? CreekDog Mar 2013 #9
It is a stupid description. Clames Mar 2013 #10
so i'm stupid now? CreekDog Mar 2013 #11
Did I SAY that YOU as a PERSON are stupid? Clames Mar 2013 #12
you said what i suggested was stupid and idiotic CreekDog Mar 2013 #13
I know PhD's that present stupid ideas. Clames Mar 2013 #14
you know what? you think we are stupid because we are liberal CreekDog Mar 2013 #17
I'm here because I don't believe in those miniscule... Clames Mar 2013 #21
you're in this group because this is the only topic that interests you CreekDog Mar 2013 #22
Wrong again. Clames Mar 2013 #25
i'm wrong that you're only interested in this group, however you almost never post outside it CreekDog Mar 2013 #29
I'm mainly interested in this group. Clames Mar 2013 #31
you mean, you don't have anything to contribute at DU with respect to Obama-Romney? CreekDog Mar 2013 #34
I have plenty to contribute. Clames Mar 2013 #36
This witch hunt is unbecoming. ZombieHorde Mar 2013 #42
RKBA is for everyone. I wish we wouldn't wish each other away. nt ZombieHorde Mar 2013 #48
It should be for everyone. n/t Clames Mar 2013 #50
A point of order shadowrider Mar 2013 #16
I am at home on DU, where liberal viewpoints are the point of the place CreekDog Mar 2013 #19
LOL you're funny shadowrider Mar 2013 #24
you post here and venture out occasionally to post on guns in other forums CreekDog Mar 2013 #28
interesting, an whole election season and not a post about Obama-Romney CreekDog Mar 2013 #32
I see what you are doing here ...... oldhippie Mar 2013 #52
by the way, are you actually a liberal? you post almost exclusively here in this group CreekDog Mar 2013 #15
I am. Clames Mar 2013 #18
you're left leaning? CreekDog Mar 2013 #20
Hard for me to give a shit less about Romney. Clames Mar 2013 #23
we're too liberal for you, got it CreekDog Mar 2013 #26
Swing and a miss. Clames Mar 2013 #33
so you usually avoid the rest of DU because it's too liberal, too "small tent" for you? CreekDog Mar 2013 #35
There you go again. Clames Mar 2013 #37
you keep saying there's too small a tent, give us an example, on what issue (besides this one)? CreekDog Mar 2013 #38
Still don't get it. Clames Mar 2013 #39
so you don't post on DU because of me CreekDog Mar 2013 #40
Still aren't getting over yourself. Clames Mar 2013 #41
Gun fuckers was one one of mine. I used it to refer jmg257 Mar 2013 #44
I fully support a ban on "unlimited clips" as well madville Mar 2013 #43
Such a ban will go well with plastic Glocks... Clames Mar 2013 #45
I thought they were porcelain madville Mar 2013 #46
Try sneaking a toilet onto an airplane ... holdencaufield Mar 2013 #49
they already av8r1998 Mar 2013 #58
There haven't been "unlimited clips" in NY since 1994. Straw Man Mar 2013 #47
the mere fact av8r1998 Mar 2013 #57
oh who and what am I? CreekDog Mar 2013 #59
no av8r1998 Mar 2013 #60
should I be more like you? CreekDog Mar 2013 #61
since when av8r1998 Mar 2013 #62
You only get the unlimited clip when you beat the game on hard davepc Mar 2013 #66
What do you expect Serve The Servants Mar 2013 #30
Let's keep our fingers crossed...for our friends in NY. ileus Mar 2013 #27
Like they didn't know there aren't 7 round magazines prior to writing this law? dkf Mar 2013 #51
so you oppose any limit on ammo clips CreekDog Mar 2013 #53
I oppose all limits on ammo clips. CokeMachine Mar 2013 #54
it's fine CreekDog Mar 2013 #56
I believe climate change is occurring. CokeMachine Mar 2013 #63
you mean you won't make a statement about the need for conservation... CreekDog Mar 2013 #64
I'm all for conservation. CokeMachine Mar 2013 #65
Since you're against dams, you support removal of Klamath River dams which support agriculture CreekDog Mar 2013 #68
I believe agriculture was covered by mentioning CokeMachine Mar 2013 #69
I don't support banning either. dkf Mar 2013 #55
I tried to find a 7 round mag for my 1911. Clames Mar 2013 #67
cheaperthandirt.com has some 1911 7-rd mags. GreenStormCloud Mar 2013 #70
I've got a discount coupon to Springfield Armory to use up. Clames Mar 2013 #71
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Skelos: Gun-clip limit on...»Reply #3