Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Some have said as much right here on the DU. I wonder, though.... NYC_SKP Apr 2013 #1
Are the firearms they use on the job privately owned? ZombieHorde Apr 2013 #2
The poll question is a bit vague in any event. NYC_SKP Apr 2013 #3
I mentioned "privately owned" in the text, but I will add your imput. nt ZombieHorde Apr 2013 #5
Is the edit more clear? nt ZombieHorde Apr 2013 #6
Oh yes much better, thanks. NYC_SKP Apr 2013 #9
Thanks for the imput. Making fair political polls can be challanging. ZombieHorde Apr 2013 #15
depends on the PD gejohnston Apr 2013 #4
Ah. I edited the poll OP text to clearly exempt on duty police, etc. nt ZombieHorde Apr 2013 #7
I asked graham4anything in GD, and now I'll ask you the same question. slackmaster Apr 2013 #10
I don't support gun confiscation, but I felt that police officers, etc., should be exempt ZombieHorde Apr 2013 #13
In Texas most law enforcement supples their own sidearm oneshooter Apr 2013 #11
Interesting. I just assumed they were all State issued. nt ZombieHorde Apr 2013 #14
No. Only flaming kooks support confiscation of legally owned firearms, or of anything else. slackmaster Apr 2013 #8
Problem is, armueller2001 Apr 2013 #12
There's a word that accurately describes that situation. slackmaster Apr 2013 #17
"flaming" CreekDog Apr 2013 #34
Confiscation with compensation? krispos42 Apr 2013 #16
I didn't think of that. ZombieHorde Apr 2013 #18
No, but that is what they did in Australia. krispos42 Apr 2013 #23
I do not support confiscation of currently legally owned firearms Flashmann Apr 2013 #19
Where are all the DUers who were wanting all guns banned and collected? n-t Logical Apr 2013 #20
Strange...... I think I only saw one such comment. nt rdharma Apr 2013 #21
They're cowering in their "safe haven," unwilling or unable to make convincing arguments in favor... slackmaster Apr 2013 #22
There are only a handful when it comes to handguns. A lot more when it comes to assault weapons. n hack89 Apr 2013 #29
Which is odd because handguns kill many more people. n-t Logical Apr 2013 #33
Logic and gun control don't always go together. nt hack89 Apr 2013 #35
Here's one kudzu22 Apr 2013 #32
Only if they're caught with them outside their house after the ban is passed... nt Comrade_McKenzie Apr 2013 #24
High moe, but serendipity to the rescue jimmy the one Apr 2013 #25
No group of DUers will take your guns stop the meme upaloopa Apr 2013 #26
Including assault weapons? The present number in circulation is OK? hack89 Apr 2013 #30
I don't have guns to take, so I know no group of DUers will take my guns, ZombieHorde Apr 2013 #31
I don't support the confiscation of anything tularetom Apr 2013 #27
Not all but certainly the vast majority. bowens43 Apr 2013 #28
don't think of it as confiscation-think of it as mandatory voluntary surrender bubbayugga Apr 2013 #36
Of course criminals will not voluntarily surrender their firearms. ... spin Apr 2013 #37
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Do you support the confis...»Reply #17