Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Three recent examples of why we carry in restaurants. [View all]SteveW
(754 posts)24. The reality is violent crime rates are down, guns "awash" or no...
There is little evidence to link the number of guns in civilian hands to any crime rate, up or down.
People acquire hand guns (and other types) for self-defense. That should not be difficult to understand.
You should know by now that the chief proponent of a relationship between guns and crime have been controller/banners who for years said "more guns = more crimes." They have not proved their case, and the evidence is a lower crime rate.
The number of guns in people's hands matters little to me because there is little evidence of any real social consequence as a result of that number.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
115 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Because there's constantly people insisting anyone who carries a weapon is a psychopath.
TheWraith
Jan 2012
#4
My car has bumpers, crumple zones, multiple air bags, restraints, anti-lock brakes, a safety cage, s
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2012
#44
No it doesn't. After years of "gun crime" postings, just leveling the playing field.
SteveW
Jan 2012
#19
Not every child would learn from a block of ice. The young teen I know who was accidentally killed
pnwmom
Jan 2012
#56
In the scenario you describe, in most states you would have both legal and moral responsibility.
pnwmom
Jan 2012
#60
Good luck with that argument in a CIVIL suit. (Check with your homeowner's insurance agent
pnwmom
Jan 2012
#64
Your final line is what I always consider the most useful message of injury/mortality
petronius
Jan 2012
#57
If you were truly concerned about child safety you would be concerned about....
GreenStormCloud
Jan 2012
#65
Well, something is working: Gun-involved childhood accidents are on the decline.
SteveW
Feb 2012
#115
My friend working at an Applebees was telling me this couple was sitting at their bar minding their
southernyankeebelle
Jan 2012
#13