Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: NY SAFE Act: FFLs are refusing to do private-sale transfers. [View all]Straw Man
(6,942 posts)12. Nice rant.
Unfortunately, it bears no relation to the topic under discussion. The FFL dealers are asking why the state feels it has the right to ask them to operate at a loss. The gun owners are asking how they can comply with the law when the FFLs are unwilling to bear the financial burden of the transaction.
The price cap is unrealistic, and it makes compliance with the law more difficult. Whether this can be attributed to incompetence or calculation is up for discussion.
Child molesters, wife beaters, and violent felons, oh my!
Anyone who uses the term "freedumb" is self-identifying as a propagandist hack with no interest in good-faith discussion. I'm just sayin' ...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
52 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I don't believe this -- this legislation was well-thought out and debated prior to passage
kudzu22
Apr 2013
#11
I'm sure some guy with an FFL will figure out how to make money on this.........
rdharma
Apr 2013
#25