Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
8. I think you are interpreting it incorrectly.
Sat May 4, 2013, 01:29 PM
May 2013

Any firearms sale of a non antique firearm that crosses state lines requires an FFL and I do not believe that Manchin-Toomey would have changed that.

Current Federal law allows you to buy a long gun from any FFL. So if you live in RI and are on vacation in OH and see a long gun that you have always wanted, you can buy it from that FFL presuming it is legal for you to own in the state you reside in. What Manchin-Toomey would have done is change the handgun purchase law to match the current law how long guns are handled.*

Current Federal law ONLY allows you to buy a handgun from a FFL in the state you reside in. Any purchase of a handgun from an out of state FFL dealer requires you to have the out of state FFL dealer ship the handgun to a FFL dealer in the state you reside in and then you have to complete the paperwork to transfer the handgun to you.

Federal Law: Any firearms sale of a non antique firearm that crosses state lines requires an FFL

State Law: A private sale between residents of a state are governed by the state laws the people reside in.

*Internet sales would still require a in state FFL to transfer the firearm.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»a provision in Manchin-To...»Reply #8