Even "Gun Rights" Judge Can't Stomach NRA Extremism

[ellisonz]

2. Conflated analysis.

You're conflating effective regulation with a negation of gun rights. This ruling is actually consistent with what I've said all along which is that although there is a right to bear arms in the context of service in the militia, this right is in no way unlimited. For all practical purposes the supposed claim that there is a "individual right" is entirely rhetorical. Even Judge Cummings rejects the extremist views of those beholden to a dogma of "gun rights" that has no real basis in the Constitution.

You'll never see me objecting to democracy, what will you will see is me rejecting the *Judicial branch* bending to the whims of political attitudes of the moment in ways that are inconsistent with the Constitution. I'm no fascist, but I'm sure as a heck a Federalist.