Gun Control & RKBA

sdrake

(17 posts)

41. im sorry i don't understand

Reply to gejohnston (Reply #39)

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 06:12 AM

Jun 2013

could you please elaborate?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

68 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Another AR-15 "owner" who shouldn't have been one legally! [View all] rdharma Jun 2013 OP

Bong...and bong again friendly_iconoclast Jun 2013 #1

Prolly. Decoy of Fenris Jun 2013 #8

Picked that one out long ago. Even had a post blocked CokeMachine Jun 2013 #12

Eh. It ain't against the TOS, and it's not like he has new material. Decoy of Fenris Jun 2013 #13

Yep -- that one and a couple of others are just here to disrupt. CokeMachine Jun 2013 #15

Rack 'em good, mate. Decoy of Fenris Jun 2013 #17

I am sure Duckhunter935 Jun 2013 #2

I don't know! CA banned all the guns, HOW COULD HE DO IT?! They were banned! Decoy of Fenris Jun 2013 #3

agree sdrake Jun 2013 #38

there was a time in history when they weren't gejohnston Jun 2013 #39

im sorry i don't understand sdrake Jun 2013 #41

during the middle ages, gejohnston Jun 2013 #42

Yessir. Enforce the laws already on the books... This was an illegal firearm. NYC_SKP Jun 2013 #4

Assault rifles and high cap magazines have been illegal in California OffWithTheirHeads Jun 2013 #5

Not with Nevada and Arizona next door! rdharma Jun 2013 #7

Nope, but good try: Decoy of Fenris Jun 2013 #9

Yes! Nice try! Shall we talk about REGISTRATION AND BACKGROUND CHECKS? rdharma Jun 2013 #10

Oh, y'see, the poster you were replying to was talking about bans. Decoy of Fenris Jun 2013 #11

I was talking about Nevada and Arizona. rdharma Jun 2013 #14

I'll grant a misunderstanding. Grudgingly. Decoy of Fenris Jun 2013 #16

still a violation of the Gun Control Act gejohnston Jun 2013 #18

"BTW, where did it say it was an AR type?" rdharma Jun 2013 #25

should have included the link in the OP. gejohnston Jun 2013 #27

Could have been shipped from Mars too! rdharma Jun 2013 #29

more likely teleported from gejohnston Jun 2013 #30

More likely purchased through "legal" sources! rdharma Jun 2013 #31

slim chance gejohnston Jun 2013 #33

This message was self-deleted by its author premium Jun 2013 #36

The point is that he didn't have one legally. And even if Nevada and Arizona banned them OffWithTheirHeads Jun 2013 #19

It'll be interesting to see how this crazy dude circumvented the existing CA gun laws....... rdharma Jun 2013 #6

I know that in Arizona you have to be able to prove you are a resident OffWithTheirHeads Jun 2013 #20

that's actually federal law gejohnston Jun 2013 #21

Thanks. Did not know that. OffWithTheirHeads Jun 2013 #22

Let's see that. rdharma Jun 2013 #23

how many newspaper ads are there for ARs at the moment? gejohnston Jun 2013 #26

"But he said he was from Nevada"....... rdharma Jun 2013 #44

so you think this guy was reading the want ads in NV papers? gejohnston Jun 2013 #45

No. But I'll bet there were announcements for gun shows. rdharma Jun 2013 #48

most gun show sellers are FFLs gejohnston Jun 2013 #51

Not talking about a "gun store"! rdharma Jun 2013 #24

Doesn't matter. Twofish Jun 2013 #32

NO. No requirement for private seller to perform background check on private sale. rdharma Jun 2013 #50

it is more accurate to say that gejohnston Jun 2013 #52

Many DON'T require ID. rdharma Jun 2013 #54

you haven't provided evidence that the purchase was recent gejohnston Jun 2013 #56

Proof? rdharma Jun 2013 #57

maybe, maybe not. gejohnston Jun 2013 #59

"The answer is only knowable if you find where he got the rifle" rdharma Jun 2013 #62

At least you admit ....... YOU DON'T KNOW! rdharma Jun 2013 #28

Why? To make you happy? I really don't give a fuck what you think. OffWithTheirHeads Jun 2013 #34

"I happen to like Arizona's gun laws." rdharma Jun 2013 #66

Same in Nevada, premium Jun 2013 #37

Just when ARs were starting to show back up ileus Jun 2013 #35

judging from the photo gejohnston Jun 2013 #40

Some of the ammo appeared to be still in the box kudzu22 Jun 2013 #43

Since he had approx. 30 x 30 rd. mags, rdharma Jun 2013 #47

"Remington percussion revolver" rdharma Jun 2013 #46

maybe gejohnston Jun 2013 #49

No. It's a common trick. Order a Rem. 1858 percusion in .44 and get different cylinders...... rdharma Jun 2013 #53

so the media says. gejohnston Jun 2013 #55

I've used a USAF range on occasions. rdharma Jun 2013 #58

no, and yes. gejohnston Jun 2013 #60

Nope. Not a "zoomie"! rdharma Jun 2013 #61

Yeah, right. gejohnston Jun 2013 #63

Oh, puhlease, gejohnston..... don't get me started on AF small arms training. rdharma Jun 2013 #64

I'm sure you have gejohnston Jun 2013 #65

"But I'm guessing the ranges were either SAC or Space Command, or maybe the academy." rdharma Jun 2013 #67

because they were commands I have never been in. gejohnston Jun 2013 #68