Gun Control & RKBA

rdharma

(6,057 posts)

47. Since he had approx. 30 x 30 rd. mags,

Mon Jun 10, 2013, 03:27 PM

Jun 2013

I doubt he was counting on "reloading" mags. Guess he figure 900 rounds was enough and probably left the remaining ammo behind.

Remember, the article said he "had" that much ammo. It didn't say he had all the ammo with him.

SO ...... what was your point?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

68 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Another AR-15 "owner" who shouldn't have been one legally! [View all] rdharma Jun 2013 OP

Bong...and bong again friendly_iconoclast Jun 2013 #1

Prolly. Decoy of Fenris Jun 2013 #8

Picked that one out long ago. Even had a post blocked CokeMachine Jun 2013 #12

Eh. It ain't against the TOS, and it's not like he has new material. Decoy of Fenris Jun 2013 #13

Yep -- that one and a couple of others are just here to disrupt. CokeMachine Jun 2013 #15

Rack 'em good, mate. Decoy of Fenris Jun 2013 #17

I am sure Duckhunter935 Jun 2013 #2

I don't know! CA banned all the guns, HOW COULD HE DO IT?! They were banned! Decoy of Fenris Jun 2013 #3

agree sdrake Jun 2013 #38

there was a time in history when they weren't gejohnston Jun 2013 #39

im sorry i don't understand sdrake Jun 2013 #41

during the middle ages, gejohnston Jun 2013 #42

Yessir. Enforce the laws already on the books... This was an illegal firearm. NYC_SKP Jun 2013 #4

Assault rifles and high cap magazines have been illegal in California OffWithTheirHeads Jun 2013 #5

Not with Nevada and Arizona next door! rdharma Jun 2013 #7

Nope, but good try: Decoy of Fenris Jun 2013 #9

Yes! Nice try! Shall we talk about REGISTRATION AND BACKGROUND CHECKS? rdharma Jun 2013 #10

Oh, y'see, the poster you were replying to was talking about bans. Decoy of Fenris Jun 2013 #11

I was talking about Nevada and Arizona. rdharma Jun 2013 #14

I'll grant a misunderstanding. Grudgingly. Decoy of Fenris Jun 2013 #16

still a violation of the Gun Control Act gejohnston Jun 2013 #18

"BTW, where did it say it was an AR type?" rdharma Jun 2013 #25

should have included the link in the OP. gejohnston Jun 2013 #27

Could have been shipped from Mars too! rdharma Jun 2013 #29

more likely teleported from gejohnston Jun 2013 #30

More likely purchased through "legal" sources! rdharma Jun 2013 #31

slim chance gejohnston Jun 2013 #33

This message was self-deleted by its author premium Jun 2013 #36

The point is that he didn't have one legally. And even if Nevada and Arizona banned them OffWithTheirHeads Jun 2013 #19

It'll be interesting to see how this crazy dude circumvented the existing CA gun laws....... rdharma Jun 2013 #6

I know that in Arizona you have to be able to prove you are a resident OffWithTheirHeads Jun 2013 #20

that's actually federal law gejohnston Jun 2013 #21

Thanks. Did not know that. OffWithTheirHeads Jun 2013 #22

Let's see that. rdharma Jun 2013 #23

how many newspaper ads are there for ARs at the moment? gejohnston Jun 2013 #26

"But he said he was from Nevada"....... rdharma Jun 2013 #44

so you think this guy was reading the want ads in NV papers? gejohnston Jun 2013 #45

No. But I'll bet there were announcements for gun shows. rdharma Jun 2013 #48

most gun show sellers are FFLs gejohnston Jun 2013 #51

Not talking about a "gun store"! rdharma Jun 2013 #24

Doesn't matter. Twofish Jun 2013 #32

NO. No requirement for private seller to perform background check on private sale. rdharma Jun 2013 #50

it is more accurate to say that gejohnston Jun 2013 #52

Many DON'T require ID. rdharma Jun 2013 #54

you haven't provided evidence that the purchase was recent gejohnston Jun 2013 #56

Proof? rdharma Jun 2013 #57

maybe, maybe not. gejohnston Jun 2013 #59

"The answer is only knowable if you find where he got the rifle" rdharma Jun 2013 #62

At least you admit ....... YOU DON'T KNOW! rdharma Jun 2013 #28

Why? To make you happy? I really don't give a fuck what you think. OffWithTheirHeads Jun 2013 #34

"I happen to like Arizona's gun laws." rdharma Jun 2013 #66

Same in Nevada, premium Jun 2013 #37

Just when ARs were starting to show back up ileus Jun 2013 #35

judging from the photo gejohnston Jun 2013 #40

Some of the ammo appeared to be still in the box kudzu22 Jun 2013 #43

Since he had approx. 30 x 30 rd. mags, rdharma Jun 2013 #47

"Remington percussion revolver" rdharma Jun 2013 #46

maybe gejohnston Jun 2013 #49

No. It's a common trick. Order a Rem. 1858 percusion in .44 and get different cylinders...... rdharma Jun 2013 #53

so the media says. gejohnston Jun 2013 #55

I've used a USAF range on occasions. rdharma Jun 2013 #58

no, and yes. gejohnston Jun 2013 #60

Nope. Not a "zoomie"! rdharma Jun 2013 #61

Yeah, right. gejohnston Jun 2013 #63

Oh, puhlease, gejohnston..... don't get me started on AF small arms training. rdharma Jun 2013 #64

I'm sure you have gejohnston Jun 2013 #65

"But I'm guessing the ranges were either SAC or Space Command, or maybe the academy." rdharma Jun 2013 #67

because they were commands I have never been in. gejohnston Jun 2013 #68