Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
60. strange,
Fri Jul 5, 2013, 09:47 PM
Jul 2013

none of that matches what I'm watching in person. I'm here. I am have been watching word for word, live stream in my office and I actually managed to take a day to attend in person.
The article is wrong on two things: Under every self defense law, even common law states like Wyoming and California, the threshold is "having a reasonable belief that one is about to suffer death or grave bodily injury."
The ME never examines Zimmerman's wounds and was fired for incompetence and unsanitary conditions in another county. The article writer misrepresented the PA's testimony at best.
Like I said, I watched it person. I really don't care what some blogger did not report from first hand, did not bother to research the relevant law. Given the power of Google, it quite easy to do. This is the very thing the Trib article talks about.
Here are the exact words:
O’Mara: “Medically speaking, would you say that whatever he did to stop the attack allowed him to survive it?” Folgate: “It could have, yes.”
The only eye witness, John Good, testified that he saw Martin straddling Zimmerman beating the shit out of him.

You can submit all you want. The State presented no such evidence in court, nor did it attempt to. That is the only thing it matters.
BTW, can you accurately describe "stand your ground" and how it differs from "duty to retreat"? Do you know the difference? It actually sounds like you are philosophically opposed to people defending themselves be it with a gun or switchblade.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This is just too funny. premium Jul 2013 #1
Watch any baseball? discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2013 #3
Maybe closer to a suicide squeeze play. nt CokeMachine Jul 2013 #4
Baseball is so much... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2013 #6
Unless your sitting next to a Dodgers fan!! CokeMachine Jul 2013 #8
H88er ileus Jul 2013 #9
We have fune with it. CokeMachine Jul 2013 #18
I have my own team... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2013 #10
The giants gave up a no hitter -- ouch!! CokeMachine Jul 2013 #11
Lisa, Daley and Quinn will split the Cook County and chicago primary vote DonP Jul 2013 #5
Sounds about on the money discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2013 #7
Nice to see a Democrat taking the lead here on behalf of IL citizens' rights. n/t appal_jack Jul 2013 #2
Why is the only right that matters here BainsBane Jul 2013 #12
Why do you only know Jack & Shit? appal_jack Jul 2013 #13
I was not referring to you in particular BainsBane Jul 2013 #14
Who is attempting to take Jenoch Jul 2013 #20
The NRA is actively undermining First Amendment rights BainsBane Jul 2013 #21
There are many affordable areas Jenoch Jul 2013 #23
How about you mind your own business instead of telling other people BainsBane Jul 2013 #25
"Control the criminals with guns" BainsBane Jul 2013 #22
I did not say anything about Jenoch Jul 2013 #24
I worked diligently for Sarah Weddington's election to the Texas House Eleanors38 Jul 2013 #19
I hope they are, Eleanors38! calimary Jul 2013 #26
Thanks for the moral support! Eleanors38 Jul 2013 #27
Absolutely! We need people with your perspective here! calimary Jul 2013 #71
Fellow Dems are not trying to take those rights away from us. hack89 Jul 2013 #15
Well, if we count gun folk as "fellow Dems" BainsBane Jul 2013 #29
There you are with the hyperbole again. hack89 Jul 2013 #31
You ignored my point about the First Amendment BainsBane Jul 2013 #33
Hardly anyone here says that there such be no limits on the 2A hack89 Jul 2013 #35
Unfortunately, not every gunner agrees with you BainsBane Jul 2013 #39
"People here...insist the right to guns trumps every other right." No, they don't. friendly_iconoclast Jul 2013 #36
Pretending guns don't harm is absurd BainsBane Jul 2013 #40
Until some *human* uses one to harm another, guns just sit there doing nothing. friendly_iconoclast Jul 2013 #50
Usually BainsBane Jul 2013 #56
Dangerous humans don't seem to care about gun control laws. friendly_iconoclast Jul 2013 #57
Dangerous humans like George Zimmerman? BainsBane Jul 2013 #64
Looks like *someone* is conflating 'number' with 'rate'- and throwing in an associational fallacy... friendly_iconoclast Jul 2013 #65
And there's that incantation again: "NRA talking point" friendly_iconoclast Jul 2013 #67
Terroist attacks are EXTREMELY rare. Jenoch Jul 2013 #59
It's not the only right that matters ExCop-LawStudent Jul 2013 #16
If you don't like what we talk about, premium Jul 2013 #17
Just pointing out yet another contradiction BainsBane Jul 2013 #30
That's incorrect ExCop-LawStudent Jul 2013 #34
Evidently free speech is not among those rights gunners care about BainsBane Jul 2013 #37
Gee, I guess you didn't read the post that you are replying to. ExCop-LawStudent Jul 2013 #38
I read it BainsBane Jul 2013 #42
OK ExCop-LawStudent Jul 2013 #43
CCW holders who kill like Zimmerman gejohnston Jul 2013 #41
Do you have a point? BainsBane Jul 2013 #44
Actually I did. gejohnston Jul 2013 #45
That ME's testimony today was a clusterfuck for the prosecution, premium Jul 2013 #46
the jury can vote on manslaughter gejohnston Jul 2013 #48
I'll go with that, premium Jul 2013 #49
The State brought it only because of political pressure gejohnston Jul 2013 #52
I've said all along that the state caved to public and political pressure. nt. premium Jul 2013 #54
what I find interesting gejohnston Jul 2013 #72
As a friend says... NaturalHigh Jul 2013 #70
Expecting me to read two articles is to discern your point BainsBane Jul 2013 #47
two things gejohnston Jul 2013 #51
okay BainsBane Jul 2013 #58
strange, gejohnston Jul 2013 #60
I cited that article only for evidence that the Civil Rights Office BainsBane Jul 2013 #62
what? gejohnston Jul 2013 #63
One by one BainsBane Jul 2013 #68
To put it very simple gejohnston Jul 2013 #69
"There are over 506 documented cases of CCW holders killing someone" Which proves they're... friendly_iconoclast Jul 2013 #53
Is that what that tells you? BainsBane Jul 2013 #61
Frankly, you're safer around CCW holders than non-CCW holders friendly_iconoclast Jul 2013 #66
I don't care about constitutional rights? premium Jul 2013 #55
Please be advised that this group IS "Gun Control & RKBA". GreenStormCloud Jul 2013 #28
Quinn is really cutting off his own nose over this. NaturalHigh Jul 2013 #32
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Illinois: Phelps files t...»Reply #60