Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

In reply to the discussion: A newer, smarter bullet [View all]

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

A newer, smarter bullet [View all] Glassunion Feb 2012 OP
Shoot, manufacturers already have 31 round magazines and smooth bore rifles on drawing board. Hoyt Feb 2012 #1
why would you want smoothbore rifles gejohnston Feb 2012 #5
"smoothbore rifle"? good oxymoron JustABozoOnThisBus Feb 2012 #25
I'm sure those 'smoothbore rifles' will have shoulder things that go up... friendly_iconoclast Feb 2012 #26
I just hope they use bullet clips ;) n/t discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2012 #28
I get that gejohnston Feb 2012 #35
I have a reproduction CVA 1860 Colt michreject Feb 2012 #46
For years, controller/prohibitionists have said 2A was about "flintlocks," "muskets," etc.... SteveW Feb 2012 #51
It pays to read... Glassunion Feb 2012 #6
Just when I think you cannot get any more inane... liberal_biker Feb 2012 #10
Smooth bore rifles? Callisto32 Feb 2012 #12
"smooth bore rifles"? PavePusher Feb 2012 #13
Maybe we can attach tiny dynamos to his typing fingers? Callisto32 Feb 2012 #16
Ahem, I did say "useful". ;>) n/t PavePusher Feb 2012 #32
In the rack, next to rifled smoothbore muskets, krispos42 Feb 2012 #67
Hoyt, you are good entertainment, but you should have read the article. ManiacJoe Feb 2012 #14
and another post made without anything being said except rl6214 Feb 2012 #17
oh Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #24
Again, showing your total ignorance. TheWraith Feb 2012 #43
How the hell do you paint someone with a laser designator, if you can't see them? AtheistCrusader Feb 2012 #44
So many words to make no point at all. Union Scribe Feb 2012 #65
No need to spend a lot of time on posting to "flat earthers. " Hoyt Feb 2012 #66
The NRA is now, probably, trying to get it sold on the open market. demosincebirth Feb 2012 #2
and you base this statement on what? liberal_biker Feb 2012 #11
I was being facetious. I thought it would be quite obvious...guess I was wrong. demosincebirth Feb 2012 #38
Sadly no.... liberal_biker Feb 2012 #45
That doesn't even make sense. Callisto32 Feb 2012 #18
Why would the NRA want to get sold on the open market rl6214 Feb 2012 #20
Jeez, see my edit. demosincebirth Feb 2012 #39
Jeez, edited at 7:10pm when my post was at 3:25pm rl6214 Feb 2012 #41
Better late than never. Thanks for your post otherwise I wouldn't have noticed it. demosincebirth Feb 2012 #42
Hey, all in good fun rl6214 Feb 2012 #47
oh Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #23
What, are they doing an IPO? PavePusher Feb 2012 #29
I don't see why not. liberal_biker Feb 2012 #3
kind of moot for now. gejohnston Feb 2012 #4
They really only need one customer. jeepnstein Feb 2012 #21
Gun control zipplewrath Feb 2012 #7
Personally I see it as more of a Sniper/Scout or Hunter/Guide weapon. Glassunion Feb 2012 #8
What's the caliber of the projectile including sabot? MicaelS Feb 2012 #9
Not if it isn't a cartridge? Callisto32 Feb 2012 #15
From the photo, I would guess less than .50. Glassunion Feb 2012 #19
OK, so you're putting food on the table... MicaelS Feb 2012 #22
Not sure, as there is no price tag on it at the moment. Glassunion Feb 2012 #34
Actually...it's probably considerably larger... Clames Feb 2012 #40
I'm going to respectfully disagree with you on the size... Glassunion Feb 2012 #58
I hope this doesn't become available to the public in my lifetime tularetom Feb 2012 #27
Nah - you can still hunt with lower tech items. liberal_biker Feb 2012 #30
How so? Only the very wealthy would be able to afford it, and practical issues.... PavePusher Feb 2012 #31
That's not sporting jpak Feb 2012 #33
Not meant to be n/t liberal_biker Feb 2012 #36
"Sporting" is for people who don't have to think about where next months' meals are coming from. PavePusher Feb 2012 #37
I know of no hunters who do it for food. Logical Feb 2012 #48
I know several. jeepnstein Feb 2012 #50
Pleased to meet you. Glassunion Feb 2012 #59
So he has no money for food? That is a tough life. I wish him well. Logical Feb 2012 #60
There is a difference between Glassunion Feb 2012 #61
I can't agree with your characterization of "sporting..." SteveW Feb 2012 #52
Nothing new here DWC Feb 2012 #49
The bigger issue here. Atypical Liberal Feb 2012 #53
Scew all that.... Glassunion Feb 2012 #54
Why should we be? liberal_biker Feb 2012 #55
Exactly my point. Atypical Liberal Feb 2012 #56
Ah - i misunderstood. liberal_biker Feb 2012 #57
Something that strikes me about that image is that the bullet seems to have petronius Feb 2012 #62
Yes, that was an odd flight path. ManiacJoe Feb 2012 #63
I imagine it has to do with the over-correcting they mentioned: petronius Feb 2012 #64
I don't see any real use for it. GreenStormCloud Feb 2012 #68
Not as an individual weapon, but as the basis of an antiaircraft/antimissile CIWS. friendly_iconoclast Feb 2012 #69
Why would anyone oppose... Dissonance Feb 2012 #70
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»A newer, smarter bullet»Reply #30