Gun Control & RKBA

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)

70. even if her post was of substance, it is her style that leaves me cold. Her tone and demeanor have

Wed Sep 18, 2013, 10:43 PM

Sep 2013

always come across (to me) as someone who is here to lord over the rest of us.

and then I get called rude and hostile when I call her on it ... lovely.

She is just mad at me because I have exposed some of the games she has played on this site.

so she deflected by getting even more offensive to me.

whatever, I hope she is truly done with me because I was done with her a long time ago.

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

140 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What are you going to do this week to support expanded background checks? [View all] BainsBane Sep 2013 OP

Oh my Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2013 #1

Seriously? BainsBane Sep 2013 #3

It's not so much burdensome as comical. Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2013 #7

You think this is funny? BainsBane Sep 2013 #10

Yes, I think you're OP is funny. Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2013 #13

So you're with the 9% of the nation who opposes background checks BainsBane Sep 2013 #16

Exactly as I predicted: chant the mantra or be deemded a heretic Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2013 #19

You don't even remember the discussions you've had 1000 times before BainsBane Sep 2013 #22

And thus the declaration of anathema. Next comes excommunication. Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2013 #26

the 91 percent number came from gejohnston Sep 2013 #21

Wrong again BainsBane Sep 2013 #29

No, Frank Luntz did the poll gejohnston Sep 2013 #32

Sigh BainsBane Sep 2013 #35

MAIG commissioned Luntz gejohnston Sep 2013 #39

what I do and what I post about on the internet is for me alone to determine. I don't reveal any Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2013 #2

I told him I felt quite sure you were female BainsBane Sep 2013 #4

There is no implication there for you to infer at all. Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2013 #5

You don't need to give the name of the representative BainsBane Sep 2013 #8

ok Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2013 #12

just a heads up gejohnston Sep 2013 #6

once again you are misinformed BainsBane Sep 2013 #27

Sorry, I know the laws gejohnston Sep 2013 #36

You have never cared about facts BainsBane Sep 2013 #41

most gun show dealers are licenced gejohnston Sep 2013 #44

Most is not all BainsBane Sep 2013 #45

amazing you avoid articles and reports by people who know what they are talking about gejohnston Sep 2013 #50

In Minnesota, the only time a gun can be purchased at a gun show without a background check Jenoch Sep 2013 #46

You are the misinformed one. Straw Man Sep 2013 #71

Read the article BainsBane Sep 2013 #72

You don't know squat about this -- that's obvious. Straw Man Sep 2013 #73

LOL BainsBane Sep 2013 #75

straw man speaks the truth gejohnston Sep 2013 #76

You know even less about me ... Straw Man Sep 2013 #77

The interesting thing about online articles BainsBane Sep 2013 #78

on the latter, gejohnston Sep 2013 #79

Loving your bullshit canards. Straw Man Sep 2013 #103

I must be doing things wrong Duckhunter935 Sep 2013 #108

Because an unlicensed dealer isn't regulated under the law doesn't mean they don't exist BainsBane Sep 2013 #112

You haven't a clue. Straw Man Sep 2013 #115

I read all six pages gejohnston Sep 2013 #74

"...if all guns are already checked?" Jenoch Sep 2013 #88

This seems more like a Gun Control Reform Activism thread. I'd be happy to post a reply over there. NYC_SKP Sep 2013 #9

People have talked endlessly BainsBane Sep 2013 #11

I didn't see the one in GD, so I owe you an apology. NYC_SKP Sep 2013 #14

Not precisely BainsBane Sep 2013 #20

The target audience is different. - Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2013 #24

"This seems the equivalent of setting up a government commission to make sure nothing is done." Jenoch Sep 2013 #87

You must admit that it's written, literally, as a challenge and it has a disagreeable end to it. -- Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2013 #15

It is indeed a challenge BainsBane Sep 2013 #17

yeah, right. Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2013 #18

I'm sorry you find so objectionable the idea of keeping guns out of the hands of criminals BainsBane Sep 2013 #23

I am sorry that you continue to try and put words in my mouth. Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2013 #25

I've had it with your insults BainsBane Sep 2013 #28

good lord. I am short and to the point. you however, run on and on and on Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2013 #30

Already the law Duckhunter935 Sep 2013 #109

After seeing the edits in the OP. Jenoch Sep 2013 #69

even if her post was of substance, it is her style that leaves me cold. Her tone and demeanor have Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2013 #70

Federal Congress critters have already heard from me sarisataka Sep 2013 #31

a bill failed in committee last spring BainsBane Sep 2013 #34

A bit sarisataka Sep 2013 #37

Yeah, I looked at that before BainsBane Sep 2013 #38

They have a volunteer tab sarisataka Sep 2013 #40

Nothing. ntt rrneck Sep 2013 #33

Lemme ask you this... Callmecrazy Sep 2013 #42

felons and those adjudicated a danger to themselves and others BainsBane Sep 2013 #43

Well drugs are illegal, if I wanted Drugs warrant46 Sep 2013 #60

You're dreaming... Callmecrazy Sep 2013 #47

So in other words, you want to make it easy for criminals to have access to guns BainsBane Sep 2013 #48

In other words? Callmecrazy Sep 2013 #51

Actually I called to suppport expanded VA Health Care for Mental Illness and Paranoid Behavior warrant46 Sep 2013 #52

That's good BainsBane Sep 2013 #54

What does that have to do with the Veterans Administration treating mental illness warrant46 Sep 2013 #55

Did you read the OP? BainsBane Sep 2013 #57

Read it and called my Congressman about how to stop the problem warrant46 Sep 2013 #58

IIRC, the Texan gejohnston Sep 2013 #56

DB was extremely mentally ill warrant46 Sep 2013 #59

True. One thing I don't get gejohnston Sep 2013 #62

I think they are beyond that warrant46 Sep 2013 #65

I did call my senators here in NY today. I rarely do that but I have done it before. hrmjustin Sep 2013 #49

Nothing... ileus Sep 2013 #53

Okay, so it's clear that when gungeon folk claim they support expanded background checks BainsBane Sep 2013 #64

Just because I say nothing doesn't mean I oppose expanded checks. ileus Sep 2013 #68

What? No snappy retort to post 51? Callmecrazy Sep 2013 #61

You've got way more spare time on your hands than I do BainsBane Sep 2013 #63

IN OTHER WORDS... Callmecrazy Sep 2013 #66

After I get back from the range I'll send a couple of emails. hack89 Sep 2013 #67

what can I do? Deep13 Sep 2013 #80

Exert enough pressure and they have to listen BainsBane Sep 2013 #82

Post removed Post removed Sep 2013 #81

^^^^Now this was a failed jury^^^^ NYC_SKP Sep 2013 #83

Agenda and anger... discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2013 #84

Petty games with juries are not going to help anyone move forward... NYC_SKP Sep 2013 #86

DUers have long memories BainsBane Sep 2013 #94

In your case, Jenoch Sep 2013 #95

The blocking from group was personal. NYC_SKP Sep 2013 #97

You want to know the world's best blocking story? BainsBane Sep 2013 #98

Well there it is! NYC_SKP Sep 2013 #101

The last thing this group needs is any more negative publicity. opiate69 Sep 2013 #120

There's more to the story which adds to the hilarity Major Nikon Sep 2013 #121

Yep.. and the fact that now, she sits in a position of authority on MIRT... opiate69 Sep 2013 #122

Post removed Post removed Sep 2013 #123

Awful, isn't it? BainsBane Sep 2013 #124

Such a vivid imagination... opiate69 Sep 2013 #125

Talk about an active imagination BainsBane Sep 2013 #126

Hey, wth is going on. I was just on a jury for this post. polly7 Sep 2013 #128

polly!! opiate69 Sep 2013 #129

"correcting it" by insisting BainsBane Sep 2013 #130

This message was self-deleted by its author polly7 Sep 2013 #137

Yeah I know ..... it sucks, but some just need the extra drama and a polly7 Sep 2013 #136

Oh, shit.. I am so sorry. opiate69 Sep 2013 #138

No, it's ok. I'm just not in the mood for that kind of baloney, polly7 Sep 2013 #139

I Work with BainsBane in Mirt everyday and she does her job very well. hrmjustin Sep 2013 #132

Major Nikon. Please just knock this off. NYC_SKP Sep 2013 #127

The events are exactly as I described them BainsBane Sep 2013 #131

I thought you were going to "leave the men and women of the gungeon to their business"? opiate69 Sep 2013 #133

It is her thread. If you don't like her then don't respond to her and place her on ignore. hrmjustin Sep 2013 #134

So you are unable to answer the question BainsBane Sep 2013 #135

Got a link handy? Because this version of reality does not comport opiate69 Sep 2013 #116

I could easily provide a link BainsBane Sep 2013 #117

I dont have anybody on mail block. just sayin' opiate69 Sep 2013 #118

Wow what language and respect shown warrant46 Sep 2013 #85

I think juror 2 hit the nail on the head BainsBane Sep 2013 #89

"anti-gun nut" refers to the GCRA group, not to your OP. NYC_SKP Sep 2013 #90

Yes, there is nothing nutty about it BainsBane Sep 2013 #91

Correct. We have the same goals, you and I and most in the GCRA group. NYC_SKP Sep 2013 #92

Remember that we have several gun owners in that group BainsBane Sep 2013 #93

Yeah they sure are. beevul Sep 2013 #105

I posted once Duckhunter935 Sep 2013 #111

Theyre allowing... beevul Sep 2013 #114

I have yet to alert on a single post on DU. Jenoch Sep 2013 #96

and then Mojorabbit Sep 2013 #99

So, that was alerted on my reply? NYC_SKP Sep 2013 #100

Yes! Dueling alerts! LOL nt Mojorabbit Sep 2013 #102

My reply #70 in this thread was also alerted on. 0-6 Leave It Alone --- someone Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2013 #104

...I repeat... beevul Sep 2013 #106

nope, none at all ... Tuesday Afternoon Sep 2013 #107

None exists. I shall not cast asparagus on my fellow members! NYC_SKP Sep 2013 #110

Wow BainsBane Sep 2013 #113

I'm confident that it wasn't. NYC_SKP Sep 2013 #119

I'm locking this krispos42 Sep 2013 #140