nuclear unicorn: Apparently we don't have a right to pizza we have a duty to pizza... So everyone should be required to own an AR-15. That was my take-away, at least.
I agree beevul came up with a ridiculous comparative 'amendment' with the pizza thing, surprised you're taking it seriously, for it's a ridiculous & stupid assumption you make that I was equating the frivolous pizza amendment with the bill of rights 2nd amendment - an official document not the quirky imaginings of some pro gun enthusiast.
what beevul wrote: A well regulated sauce, being necessary to the security of a proper pizza, the right of the people to keep and bear ingredients, shall not be infringed.
Again, beevul's pizza amendment bears out the militia interpretation, since ingredients are protected only (or primarily) for making pizza sauce, not for other purposes - within reason.
.. Myths come to mind - a unicorn is a myth dontcha know? ergo a nuclear unicorn would be a bigger myth reeeally stretching the imagination. And the 2ndA individual rkba is one of the biggest myths of all.
beevul non sequitur: Nobody thinks the primary purpose of amendment 2 is "securing the existence of well-regulated State Militias", other than a tiny handful of "collective rights interpretation" folks.
More from the 2nd amendment mythology; I wouldn't contend that approx 60 million americans who adhere to the militia or militia centric interpretation of 2ndA, a 'tiny handful', would anybody? It's the minority view for sure, because the 2ndA generally isn't well understood, & the gun lobby has done wonders (albeit malicious ones) by twisting about the true meaning of the 'zwitter verfassung-zusatz' (2nd amendment in german, literally 2nd constitution addition).
= new reply since forum marked as read