Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

In reply to the discussion: Bill of Rights basics [View all]

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
29. If you insist on this silliness, fine, I'll play.
Sat Oct 19, 2013, 04:09 PM
Oct 2013

Militias aren't a myth. So in order for people to be eligible for service in a militia their individual right to arms shall not be infringed.

Some may contend that militias are not currently an aspect of American defense policy but no subsequent amendment to the constitution has superseded the 2A so it remains in effect. It should also be noted that just because militias are not currently central to US defense policy doesn't mean they a precluded for all time forevermore.

Some may then argue that the law forming of the National Guard supersedes the militias but that is merely a law all laws must conform to the Constitution and no law can abrogate any part of the Constitution. Since the 2A remains in effect without subsequent amendment so too the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

It should also be noted that militias aren't always meant to be in service to the government but a guard against the government. And believe you me, from some of the nastiness coming from the anti-rights faction it is good that they be discouraged from acting on their darker impulses.

I eagerly await your next off-topic word salad --




OK, not really.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Bill of Rights basics [View all] discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2013 OP
Of course it is. NOW explain what "to keep and bear arms" means, and re: the amendment's jmg257 Oct 2013 #1
Bollocks. beevul Oct 2013 #3
You yourself backed my point... jmg257 Oct 2013 #4
A square is a rectangle, but a rectangle not a square. beevul Oct 2013 #5
And a circle is a shape, which is why my fat friend is in shape. jmg257 Oct 2013 #7
Their view was that a standing army isn't needed gejohnston Oct 2013 #8
IMHO... discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2013 #6
The whole point of the 2nd was to make sure there were well-regulated well armed jmg257 Oct 2013 #9
I guess we'll have to agree... discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2013 #11
No worries...always interesting to discuss! Nt jmg257 Oct 2013 #12
Have a nice evening. n/t discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2013 #13
If I might respond after further reflection... discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2013 #18
Agree. The Constitution ensures the militias... jmg257 Oct 2013 #24
Agree and disagree discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2013 #27
What possible relevance to your assertion does COLGATE4 Oct 2013 #2
The right... discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2013 #10
I fail to see how giving a loved one a pistol COLGATE4 Oct 2013 #14
Freedom is the exercise of choice discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2013 #15
Once again, no response to the COLGATE4 Oct 2013 #16
The question you raised: discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2013 #17
Well, when the Nazi invasion hits the U.S. I'm glad COLGATE4 Oct 2013 #21
IMHO... discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2013 #22
more word salad... COLGATE4 Oct 2013 #23
You want to arm people AFTER an invasion? Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2013 #30
Perhaps, in this case... discntnt_irny_srcsm Nov 2013 #31
pizza amendment jimmy the one Oct 2013 #19
conclusion... discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2013 #20
Apparently we don't have a right to pizza we have a duty to pizza Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #25
IMHO... discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2013 #26
unicorns are a myth jimmy the one Oct 2013 #28
If you insist on this silliness, fine, I'll play. Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2013 #29
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Bill of Rights basics»Reply #29