Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Gun violence in America continues unabated [View all]SecularMotion
(7,981 posts)2. When Australians gave back their guns
Former deputy prime minister Tim Fischer warned Australians to think twice before traveling to the United States because you are 15 times more likely to be shot dead.
This is the bitter harvest and legacy of the policies of the National Rifle Association that even blocked background checks for people buying guns at gun shows, Fischer said. I am deeply angry about this because of the callous attitude of the three teenagers, but its a sign of the proliferation of guns on the ground in the U.S.A. There is a gun for almost every American.
In 1996, after a gunman killed 35 people and wounded 18 others in Port Arthur, a former penal colony turned tourist attraction, Australians collectively decided not to follow what then-Prime Minister John Howard called the American way on guns.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/when-australians-gave-back-their-guns/2013/08/23/108458dc-0c09-11e3-8974-f97ab3b3c677_story.html
This is the bitter harvest and legacy of the policies of the National Rifle Association that even blocked background checks for people buying guns at gun shows, Fischer said. I am deeply angry about this because of the callous attitude of the three teenagers, but its a sign of the proliferation of guns on the ground in the U.S.A. There is a gun for almost every American.
In 1996, after a gunman killed 35 people and wounded 18 others in Port Arthur, a former penal colony turned tourist attraction, Australians collectively decided not to follow what then-Prime Minister John Howard called the American way on guns.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/when-australians-gave-back-their-guns/2013/08/23/108458dc-0c09-11e3-8974-f97ab3b3c677_story.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
89 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
That's a lot of fine words. Why is it that the word "confiscated" was not used?
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2014
#10
You elide the fact that the owners only "choice" was to be reimbursed or not.
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2014
#13
Opposing ineffective, feel-good laws designed to appease the ignorant...
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2014
#40
I'm fine with that. However, your posts are still gonna be thoroughly fisked...
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2014
#51
*There's* the argument from authority you didn't use previously. You're getting better!
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2014
#39
Which were simply renamed and continued in production. And none were confiscated
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2014
#47
Watch out, you'll be put on ignore and then we'll both be taking up...
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2014
#53
I first heard of Yee in passing, and that was from a Tea-Party type overjoyed at the prospet....
Oakenshield
Apr 2014
#61
The "gradual" gun prohibitionists think we don't notice what they're trying to do.
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2014
#11