Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Gun violence in America continues unabated [View all]SecularMotion
(7,981 posts)5. A third of the guns in Australia were handed in to the government.
A third of the guns in Australia were handed in to the government. Polls found that as much as 90 percent of the public approved of the stricter gun laws.
There had been 11 gun massacres in the decade preceding 1996, but there have been no mass shootings since. This is a source of national pride, though statisticians still argue about what caused the change.
- - - -
Philip Alpers, an adjunct associate professor at the Sydney School of Public Health and a specialist in firearm injury prevention, has documented that after the laws were changed, the risk of an Australian being killed by a gun fell by more than 50 percent. Australias gun homicide rate, 0.13 per 100,000 people, according to GunPolicy.org, is a tiny fraction of that of the United States (3.6 per 100,000 people). It should be noted that our gun homicide rates were already in decline, but the gun laws accelerated that slide.
In a 2010 paper, economists Andrew Leigh and Christine Neill found that the law change had led to a 65 percent decline in the rate of firearm suicides. Firearm homicides fell by 59 percent.
There had been 11 gun massacres in the decade preceding 1996, but there have been no mass shootings since. This is a source of national pride, though statisticians still argue about what caused the change.
- - - -
Philip Alpers, an adjunct associate professor at the Sydney School of Public Health and a specialist in firearm injury prevention, has documented that after the laws were changed, the risk of an Australian being killed by a gun fell by more than 50 percent. Australias gun homicide rate, 0.13 per 100,000 people, according to GunPolicy.org, is a tiny fraction of that of the United States (3.6 per 100,000 people). It should be noted that our gun homicide rates were already in decline, but the gun laws accelerated that slide.
In a 2010 paper, economists Andrew Leigh and Christine Neill found that the law change had led to a 65 percent decline in the rate of firearm suicides. Firearm homicides fell by 59 percent.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
89 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
That's a lot of fine words. Why is it that the word "confiscated" was not used?
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2014
#10
You elide the fact that the owners only "choice" was to be reimbursed or not.
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2014
#13
Opposing ineffective, feel-good laws designed to appease the ignorant...
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2014
#40
I'm fine with that. However, your posts are still gonna be thoroughly fisked...
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2014
#51
*There's* the argument from authority you didn't use previously. You're getting better!
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2014
#39
Which were simply renamed and continued in production. And none were confiscated
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2014
#47
Watch out, you'll be put on ignore and then we'll both be taking up...
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2014
#53
I first heard of Yee in passing, and that was from a Tea-Party type overjoyed at the prospet....
Oakenshield
Apr 2014
#61
The "gradual" gun prohibitionists think we don't notice what they're trying to do.
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2014
#11