Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Gun violence in America continues unabated [View all]friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)10. That's a lot of fine words. Why is it that the word "confiscated" was not used?
Beacuse that, in fact, was what happened in Australia
(From a linked page from the article you posted)
http://www.loc.gov/law/help/firearms-control/australia.php
he sale, possession, and use of firearms are regulated by the Australian states and territories, with cross-border trade matters addressed at the federal level. In 1996, following the Port Arthur massacre, the federal government and the states and territories agreed to a uniform approach to firearms regulation, including a ban on certain semiautomatic and self-loading rifles and shotguns, standard licensing and permit criteria, storage requirements and inspections, and greater restrictions on the sale of firearms and ammunition. Firearms license applicants would be required to take a safety course and show a genuine reason for owning a firearm, which could not include self-defense. The reasons for refusing a license would include reliable evidence of a mental or physical condition which would render the applicant unsuitable for owning, possessing or using a firearm. A waiting period of twenty-eight days would apply to the issuing of both firearms licenses and permits to acquire each weapon.
Alongside legislative reforms to implement the National Firearms Agreement, a national buyback program for prohibited weapons took place in 1996-1997 and resulted in more than 700,000 weapons being surrendered. Further reforms were later implemented as a result of agreements made in 2002 on firearms trafficking and handguns, as was a national buyback of newly prohibited handguns and associated parts.
Alongside legislative reforms to implement the National Firearms Agreement, a national buyback program for prohibited weapons took place in 1996-1997 and resulted in more than 700,000 weapons being surrendered. Further reforms were later implemented as a result of agreements made in 2002 on firearms trafficking and handguns, as was a national buyback of newly prohibited handguns and associated parts.
Why is it that gun prohibitionists think we don't notice?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
89 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
That's a lot of fine words. Why is it that the word "confiscated" was not used?
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2014
#10
You elide the fact that the owners only "choice" was to be reimbursed or not.
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2014
#13
Opposing ineffective, feel-good laws designed to appease the ignorant...
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2014
#40
I'm fine with that. However, your posts are still gonna be thoroughly fisked...
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2014
#51
*There's* the argument from authority you didn't use previously. You're getting better!
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2014
#39
Which were simply renamed and continued in production. And none were confiscated
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2014
#47
Watch out, you'll be put on ignore and then we'll both be taking up...
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2014
#53
I first heard of Yee in passing, and that was from a Tea-Party type overjoyed at the prospet....
Oakenshield
Apr 2014
#61
The "gradual" gun prohibitionists think we don't notice what they're trying to do.
friendly_iconoclast
Jan 2014
#11