Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Why should gun rights trump common sense? [View all]SecularMotion
(7,981 posts)16. Define "reasonable"
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
99 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Gun controllers regularly preach bans & a potpourri of disconnected restrictions...
Eleanors38
Mar 2014
#2
When you can provide a link to prove I made that claim, I'll give you an answer.
SecularMotion
Mar 2014
#21
I know you bleat quite a bit about people accepting the "official story."
Nuclear Unicorn
Mar 2014
#26
Apologize for what? Perhaps you can provide a link to what you actually believe.
Nuclear Unicorn
Mar 2014
#31
You refuse to state your opinion -- in addition to the fact you do nothing else besides
Nuclear Unicorn
Mar 2014
#61
If my posts upset you so much, please put me on ignore and stop disrupting threads.
SecularMotion
Mar 2014
#63
Don't confuse the poster with facts he knows how he thinks it should have been.
proudretiredvet
Mar 2014
#44
And thank you as well for a reasoned response devoid of NRA talking points.
SecularMotion
Mar 2014
#52
Until we have stricter licensing standards in place "may" issue should be method to issue permits.
SecularMotion
Mar 2014
#64
I mean stricter as in the tiered licensing system you endorsed in your previous post.
SecularMotion
Mar 2014
#67
If you're trying to equate voting rights with issuing permits for public carry of a weapon.
SecularMotion
Mar 2014
#77
I consider the discussion of the definition of an "assault weapon" to be a diversionary tactic
SecularMotion
Mar 2014
#65
I agree the point is not legally correct. Carriers are non-government entities.
SecularMotion
Mar 2014
#62
Hey now!!! They are proud of their ignorence and their inate inability to raise themselves.
oneshooter
Mar 2014
#50