Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Street robberies and you [View all]Atypical Liberal
(5,412 posts)61. Race is a social fact when talking about CRIME IN GENERAL.
It does not absolutely imply......but it does immediately imply. How often do you read about White people being robbed by Skinheads?
But the fact is there are white gang members.
I do not see how when I talk about a gang member how I am immediately talking about non-white people. Nor did I see anything in the article to imply otherwise.
[quote]Thank you for acknowledge that race is a social fact in any discussion of gangs.[/quote]
Race is a social fact when discussing crime in general.
This does not mean every time I talk about a criminal I am talking about a specific race of people.
For example, white-collar crime is committed at a much greater rate by white people. This does not mean that when I am talking about white-collar crime I am talking about white people. Carjackings are committed at a higher rate by black people. This does not mean when I am talking about carjackers I am talking about black people.
I suggest you read this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_crime_in_the_United_States
There are definite racial trends to crime. This does not mean that every time we speak of someone who commits a certain kind of crime that we are talking about any particular race of people.
But the fact is there are white gang members.
I do not see how when I talk about a gang member how I am immediately talking about non-white people. Nor did I see anything in the article to imply otherwise.
[quote]Thank you for acknowledge that race is a social fact in any discussion of gangs.[/quote]
Race is a social fact when discussing crime in general.
This does not mean every time I talk about a criminal I am talking about a specific race of people.
For example, white-collar crime is committed at a much greater rate by white people. This does not mean that when I am talking about white-collar crime I am talking about white people. Carjackings are committed at a higher rate by black people. This does not mean when I am talking about carjackers I am talking about black people.
I suggest you read this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race_and_crime_in_the_United_States
There are definite racial trends to crime. This does not mean that every time we speak of someone who commits a certain kind of crime that we are talking about any particular race of people.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
125 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"...this guy tells you to put yourself in dangerous situations and escalate them..."
discntnt_irny_srcsm
Feb 2012
#11
Yes, because turning your back and trying to outrun them is such a good idea.
krispos42
Feb 2012
#19
The author is giving insight into 15 years of experience as a patrol officer.
Atypical Liberal
Feb 2012
#30
No, you continue to propagate the stereotype of "gangster" = "person of color".
Atypical Liberal
Feb 2012
#99
I don't deny the stereotype exists, but it is not relevant to this conversation.
Atypical Liberal
Feb 2012
#102
Racial minorities are 85% of gang members according to the Federal Government.
ellisonz
Feb 2012
#90
Are the Irish generally seen as "different" from the WASPs in today's Boston? n/t
ellisonz
Feb 2012
#40
How much experience do you have to validate an anonymous internet posting? n/t
ellisonz
Feb 2012
#17
The genetic fallacy? Really? Four words for you, then: Michael Bloomberg and MAIG.
friendly_iconoclast
Feb 2012
#50