Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: A thread in which I rebut the logical fallacies and errors of an anti-RKBA diatribe [View all]upaloopa
(11,417 posts)8. There is no glee in killings. That is a sick statement.
If people wanted a reduction in violence they surely would not be gleeful in more violence.
You must be running out of talking points to say shit like that. People don't want gun control for the sake of gun control as you seem to think.
You whole post is fail!
On edit:
Where do you get your stuff from? When did the idea of shaming gun control people start. I've seen it here before in gunner threads.
As if gunners are some maligned group.
That's the same tactic used by anti gay folks in their religious freedom arguments.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
108 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
A thread in which I rebut the logical fallacies and errors of an anti-RKBA diatribe [View all]
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2014
OP
You care more about your f-ing laws than you do about protecting the inherent rights of citizens.
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2014
#20
When you use a term like "gunners", you self identify as being unwilling to discuss rationally.
NYC_SKP
Apr 2014
#76
So, it is your contention that the government is willing to turn its greatest weapons of war against
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2014
#9
No, my contention is they can no longer serve the purpose the founders intended.
jeff47
Apr 2014
#13
he doesn't need to post to get blocked if he's outside the board goading the hosts to do so
CreekDog
Apr 2014
#43
"you'd obviously treat gun control proponents the same way given the chance"
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2014
#87
I think some posters define "goading" as speaking contrary to their SOP outside their group. N/T
beevul
Apr 2014
#50
I stand corrected. One can be blocked without actually violating the SOP.
blueridge3210
Apr 2014
#53
This is a safe haven group. Yet here you remain in spite of the fact we're
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2014
#58
Hell, they don't care about their own. At least our host locks any OP that doesn't fit.
NYC_SKP
Apr 2014
#97
It doesn't matter if a revolution is fought with AR's or rocks and pointy sticks.
Bazinga
Apr 2014
#108