Gun Control & RKBA

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)

58. This is a safe haven group. Yet here you remain in spite of the fact we're

Reply to CreekDog (Reply #55)

Mon Apr 7, 2014, 09:06 PM

Apr 2014

gun-fornicating violence-fetishists with pew-pew-pew-goes-the-bad-guy fantasies.

Weird.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

108 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A thread in which I rebut the logical fallacies and errors of an anti-RKBA diatribe [View all] Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 OP

And of course, you were blocked.. beevul Apr 2014 #1

Busy blocking over there Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #38

You go to all this trouble for what? upaloopa Apr 2014 #2

Me and others have offered up numerous ideas, and plans SQUEE Apr 2014 #4

There is no glee in killings. That is a sick statement. upaloopa Apr 2014 #8

not to you but, gejohnston Apr 2014 #12

Victims of Obvious Bigotry! Anansi1171 Apr 2014 #83

Yep, SQUEE Apr 2014 #88

"Respectable Bigotry" - page 6 pablo_marmol Apr 2014 #106

You insult with Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #6

That was no insult. This insult talking point is getting upaloopa Apr 2014 #10

You care more about your f-ing laws than you do about protecting the inherent rights of citizens. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #20

Don't be obtuse. Of course it was an insult. Lizzie Poppet Apr 2014 #92

Methinks thou doth protesteth too much! Anansi1171 Apr 2014 #84

"GunGrubs are principally concerned with having to be right" Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #90

Please tell me that was intended to be ironic. Lizzie Poppet Apr 2014 #93

"you just made his point about insults for him" Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #101

Hear, Hear! NYC_SKP Apr 2014 #98

What about you? beevul Apr 2014 #11

I was never about going after guns. upaloopa Apr 2014 #14

Ok. beevul Apr 2014 #15

No I think those people are fringe. They are not helping. upaloopa Apr 2014 #16

Please let them know that at every opportunity. N/T beevul Apr 2014 #18

Ok I will upaloopa Apr 2014 #19

If you own a gun, you are responsable for the illegal use, and the murder oneshooter Apr 2014 #102

"Changing minds." I think that's occurring on DU... Eleanors38 Apr 2014 #41

When you use a term like "gunners", you self identify as being unwilling to discuss rationally. NYC_SKP Apr 2014 #76

"You aren't going to change any minds." pablo_marmol Apr 2014 #107

The fundamental difference is what weapons can do today versus 1776. jeff47 Apr 2014 #3

Oh lookanother person.. SQUEE Apr 2014 #5

Oh look, another person who can't read. jeff47 Apr 2014 #7

So, it is your contention that the government is willing to turn its greatest weapons of war against Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #9

No, my contention is they can no longer serve the purpose the founders intended. jeff47 Apr 2014 #13

The secret service protecting reagan probably thought the same thing. beevul Apr 2014 #17

An individual is not the government. jeff47 Apr 2014 #21

Who said it was? beevul Apr 2014 #24

You did, when you cited assassination. jeff47 Apr 2014 #28

Nonsense. Pure unadulterated nonsense. beevul Apr 2014 #42

The US military, in its entirety, is not big enough to control the US. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #23

If you have that many numbers, you don't need violent revolution. jeff47 Apr 2014 #29

Hmmmm Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #33

One small disagreement about WA and CO, gejohnston Apr 2014 #34

If I may revise and extend my comments -- Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #35

mall ninjas discuss tactics, professionals discuss logistics gejohnston Apr 2014 #22

Invasion is not revolution jeff47 Apr 2014 #26

If there were such a dictiorial govenment take over the US gejohnston Apr 2014 #30

Seems the Cuban revolution was bargain basement. Eleanors38 Apr 2014 #54

post script gejohnston Apr 2014 #25

Did you put that reply in the right place? jeff47 Apr 2014 #27

that is what the OP was about gejohnston Apr 2014 #31

Oh really? ErikGuard1 Apr 2014 #32

great post The Green Manalishi Apr 2014 #36

Thanks Green ErikGuard1 Apr 2014 #37

One would have to post there first, blueridge3210 Apr 2014 #40

he doesn't need to post to get blocked if he's outside the board goading the hosts to do so CreekDog Apr 2014 #43

"goading" Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #46

are you comparing being blocked by the gun control group to the holocaust? CreekDog Apr 2014 #47

No, I'm comparing your comment to the tendency of authoritarians to Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #48

So your complaint is with DU administration itself CreekDog Apr 2014 #49

"Zeez gunners. Zey are not like 'real' people." Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #51

so you're comparing me to a Nazi? CreekDog Apr 2014 #52

"Having an argument" Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #56

please keep track of the pronouns here, it's not too much to ask CreekDog Apr 2014 #59

I was banned for the offense of posting a rebuttal. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #65

They scurry Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #69

Sometimes a concise characterization can bring a smile discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2014 #70

I like that nt Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #71

first we're Nazis and now we're communists CreekDog Apr 2014 #72

We've learned alright. beevul Apr 2014 #79

"you'd obviously treat gun control proponents the same way given the chance" Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #87

I think some posters define "goading" as speaking contrary to their SOP outside their group. N/T beevul Apr 2014 #50

I stand corrected. One can be blocked without actually violating the SOP. blueridge3210 Apr 2014 #53

yes, in safe haven groups CreekDog Apr 2014 #55

This is a safe haven group. Yet here you remain in spite of the fact we're Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #58

No, Gun Control and RKBA is not a safe haven group CreekDog Apr 2014 #60

You are correct on that Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #63

actually, most of you were quite afraid to have them discussed in GD CreekDog Apr 2014 #73

from all the alerts on gun threads in GD from folks in here. gejohnston Apr 2014 #75

WOW. beevul Apr 2014 #80

I see someone got the 2nd amendment poll locked in GD Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #86

But it ran long enough to make the point... NYC_SKP Apr 2014 #91

so you're saying that those who want to remove the 2nd Amendment CreekDog Apr 2014 #94

Reading comprehension fail. blueridge3210 Apr 2014 #95

there wasn't much to read. CreekDog Apr 2014 #96

Meanwhile, this post in GD was unlocked beevul Apr 2014 #99

Whos afraid of gun discussions in GD? beevul Apr 2014 #100

Yeah, the thought of what you'll do oughta be arrested. Eleanors38 Apr 2014 #61

Makes my knees knock just thinking about it! lol blueridge3210 Apr 2014 #67

if you think we have to let you post first CreekDog Apr 2014 #74

Block 'em, CreekDog! You know you want to! NYC_SKP Apr 2014 #81

i'm not a host there, get a clue CreekDog Apr 2014 #89

Aww, isn't that cute, you talking about following the rules. beevul Apr 2014 #82

and SOP's Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #85

Hell, they don't care about their own. At least our host locks any OP that doesn't fit. NYC_SKP Apr 2014 #97

I made 1 -- count them: 1 -- post over there and I was banned by SM. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #44

I think I made 3 Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #57

Tin horn. Eleanors38 Apr 2014 #62

your blocked number is much higher than mine Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #64

I'm surprised somebody beat me out. The reason Eleanors38 Apr 2014 #66

very bad mistake you made Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #68

Got blocked from this group, too? NYC_SKP Apr 2014 #104

That poster was me. It was called a"broad brush insult". n/t oneshooter Apr 2014 #105

Welcome to DU! gopiscrap Apr 2014 #39

Good post. Last I heard, our military is committed Eleanors38 Apr 2014 #45

And, mainline soldiers are part of the disenfranchised 99%... NYC_SKP Apr 2014 #103

You said it better than I just tried to, ErikGuard1. NYC_SKP Apr 2014 #78

I'm guessing you didn't see any active duty. NYC_SKP Apr 2014 #77

It doesn't matter if a revolution is fought with AR's or rocks and pointy sticks. Bazinga Apr 2014 #108