Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: A message to all the snub-nose revolver haters: You’re wrong [View all]spin
(17,493 posts)56. You may not like to hear this but the gun control movement did start with an effort ...
to ban certain firearms.
Brady Campaign
***snip***
The Brady Campaign was founded in 1974 as the National Council to Control Handguns (NCCH). From 1980 through 2000 it operated under the name Handgun Control, Inc. (HCI). In 2001, it was renamed the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, and its sister project, the Center to Prevent Handgun Violence, was renamed the Brady Center to Prevent Handgun Violence.
***snip***
In 1976, then chairman Nelson "Pete" Shields stated
We'll take one step at a time, and the first is necessarily given the political realities very modest. We'll have to start working again to strengthen the law, and then again to strengthen the next law and again and again. Our ultimate goal, total control of handguns, is going to take time. The first problem is to slow down production and sales. Next is to get registration. The final problem is to make possession of all handguns and ammunition (with a few exceptions) totally illegal."[15]...emphasis added
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brady_Campaign
I suspect that many in the gun control movement hope to eventually ban and confiscate most civilian owned firearms in our nation. For now they have given up trying to ban handguns and instead have targeted evil looking semiautomatic rifles which they claim are "assault rifles" useless for hunting, target shooting and self defense. If successful, the gun control movement will then focus on banning all semiautomatic firearms and then all handguns (which are the most common firearms used by criminals).
I feel that until the leadership of the gun control movement decides to give up on the goal of passing gun control laws similar to those in Great Britain and instead focuses on passing legislation that will help insure that only responsible, honest and sane citizens can purchase firearms, we will make little progress on this issue.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
74 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Then I suggest you try to change the SOP of this group...because as it stands, discussion
Jgarrick
Apr 2014
#8
Would you care to answer the question, please? Are discussions of guns for self-defense on-topic
Jgarrick
Apr 2014
#15
if I had a job as a LEO, I would prefer to carry a semiautomatic pistol and perhaps a S&W ...
spin
Apr 2014
#52
You may not like to hear this but the gun control movement did start with an effort ...
spin
Apr 2014
#56
No, guns don't equal Hillary but the point is still valid. Some people don't want to see either.
NYC_SKP
Apr 2014
#34
False-consensus effect is endemic within the ranks of the firearms averse
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2014
#37
Important info for the "why does anyone need a semi-automatic" pistol crowd.
geckosfeet
Apr 2014
#53
The J-Frame S&W in the picture is one of the most popular handguns for concealed carry ...
spin
Apr 2014
#44
Never have shot a J Frame. I'd like to eventually get a Ruger LCR in 38spl.
Skeeter Barnes
Apr 2014
#55