Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Is Everytown For Gun Safety really this ignorant? [View all]mikeysnot
(4,926 posts)96. Cry baby.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
250 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Sort of like the fictive label "Gun-grabber" you mean, and what it tells about the user?
villager
Apr 2014
#47
Yes, indeed! I try to avoid the term for the very same reason, it's just divisive.
NYC_SKP
Apr 2014
#51
Well, to be fair in terms of imagery the entire cartridge has greater symbolic power.
rrneck
Apr 2014
#3
So we've now established that an organization devoted to gun control is better informed about
Jgarrick
Apr 2014
#9
I never asserted I could. What we do know is that while the poster demonstrates a certain
Jgarrick
Apr 2014
#70
So they should show an actual person being shot instead? Would that pass your test?
VanillaRhapsody
Apr 2014
#26
Whatever it is you are using to judge this public safety message ad campaign.
VanillaRhapsody
Apr 2014
#36
And hell the anti gun people are proud of not knowing anything about that which they want to ban
clffrdjk
Apr 2014
#38
No I am not saying it SHOULD have depicted that....I am saying...if NO creative license
VanillaRhapsody
Apr 2014
#40
No the target audience might not know as much about individual weapons and ammunition...no
VanillaRhapsody
Apr 2014
#109
If the people that poster is attempting to reach are as oblivious about how guns work
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2014
#108
from a blog post by someone whose views on guns are probably closer to yours than mine
gejohnston
Apr 2014
#122
What? Uh no....not everyone who doesn't own a gun is "ignorant and fearful"
VanillaRhapsody
Apr 2014
#113
A bit of a tangent regarding the "my guns haven't killed anyone" catchphrase:
Jgarrick
Apr 2014
#116
And who's to say you won't get drunk and slaughter a family of 4 in your car?
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2014
#133
People who think entire cartridges come out of guns shouldn't lecture about "common sense."
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2014
#145
the person who did the artwork....is not the person creating the actual laws.....
VanillaRhapsody
Apr 2014
#147
Lemme guess, you also think rifles that only fire single shots are "military assault rifles."
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2014
#149
I don't worship them either. i can count on my fingers the number of times I've been shooting
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2014
#155
Yes and much of the traffic laws you obey ARE States rules.....States also
VanillaRhapsody
Apr 2014
#162
Yes that IS exactly what I WAS talking about (as I recall I mentioned it first)
VanillaRhapsody
Apr 2014
#167
you're fucking hilarious.... nothing as sick as laughing about something like this
bowens43
Apr 2014
#15
"Disgusting" for pointing out the sheer ignorance of advocates of civilian disarmament?
Jgarrick
Apr 2014
#21
Given that I have a C&R FFL and have passed the background check to acquire a silencer, I think I'm
Jgarrick
Apr 2014
#67
If the SAFE Act were to be passed in my state, I would be forced to dispose of most
Jgarrick
Apr 2014
#74
But but banning guns and forcing people to dispose of them is not disarmament!!
clffrdjk
Apr 2014
#78
Asking for a name of a bill because you don't think someone could possibly find one.
clffrdjk
Apr 2014
#89
maybe one of your sycophantic gun nut supports could help you out here and laugh at your stupid Joke
mikeysnot
Apr 2014
#208
".357 rounds in a long barrel rifle" being too much firepower to entrust to an honest citizen,
Jgarrick
Apr 2014
#193
Are you not familiar with the SAFE Act? Residents of NY are not allowed to keep previously
Jgarrick
Apr 2014
#84
10 rounds is not the most practical limit. Extensive military experience shows 30 rounds is optimal.
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2014
#213
If 30 rounds is the sign of bad aim why are police issued 30-round magazines?
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2014
#217
Federal law has defined who is part of the militia; not your personal, self-serving silliness.
Nuclear Unicorn
May 2014
#250
So you *do* now acknowledge that the SAFE Act is a civilian disarmament measure?
Jgarrick
Apr 2014
#106
Uhm yeah, because technical accuracy would help to better spread the message?
Democracyinkind
Apr 2014
#28
Well at least this time you got the right answer for what this add is promoting.
clffrdjk
Apr 2014
#48
What's wrong with promoting Republican power-mad billionaires on a liberal forum?
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2014
#93
I believe nit-picking about the technical accuracy is a tried and true way of derailing a thread.
djean111
Apr 2014
#76
Beat me to it. We really need a qualifying exam before we let people create new legislation. nt
NYC_SKP
Apr 2014
#45
I want to carry around a bottle of the Ebola Virus, tiz my new hobby, OK with you folks?
randys1
Apr 2014
#126