Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Is every apologist for gun violence really this ignorant? villager Apr 2014 #1
Consider asking an actual "apologist for gun violence." Lizzie Poppet Apr 2014 #4
Well, you'd be one. villager Apr 2014 #5
Nice slander. Lizzie Poppet Apr 2014 #6
Greetings! bravenak Apr 2014 #14
#6... JohnnyRingo Apr 2014 #25
I agree. bravenak Apr 2014 #41
I'm glad it didn't get hidden. Lizzie Poppet Apr 2014 #60
I'm guessing that the irony escapes... discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2014 #80
Ooh! Fancy words! "apologist" and now, OMG, "proliferationist".... NYC_SKP Apr 2014 #44
Sort of like the fictive label "Gun-grabber" you mean, and what it tells about the user? villager Apr 2014 #47
Yes, indeed! I try to avoid the term for the very same reason, it's just divisive. NYC_SKP Apr 2014 #51
Apology larryjf Apr 2014 #131
Smileys show a lack of concern? SQUEE Apr 2014 #65
When entire cartridges fly out of the muzzle... Lizzie Poppet Apr 2014 #2
Or just buy the correct ammo for the gun next time. ManiacJoe Apr 2014 #37
Or use a sabot. John1956PA Apr 2014 #102
Well, to be fair in terms of imagery the entire cartridge has greater symbolic power. rrneck Apr 2014 #3
I wonder if this was designed by the former MDA group? DonP Apr 2014 #7
Superman is faster than a speeding bullet. upaloopa Apr 2014 #8
So we've now established that an organization devoted to gun control is better informed about Jgarrick Apr 2014 #9
So you can outrun a bullet? mikeysnot Apr 2014 #32
one launched cartridge and all out of an unrifled barrel, yeah probably.. SQUEE Apr 2014 #66
oooo-k? mikeysnot Apr 2014 #68
I never asserted I could. What we do know is that while the poster demonstrates a certain Jgarrick Apr 2014 #70
Ah, but Superman was impervious to gunshots. JohnnyRingo Apr 2014 #27
I want to see the cartridge that fired *that* thing!! SeattleVet Apr 2014 #10
So they should show an actual person being shot instead? Would that pass your test? VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #26
Test? What kind of test? clffrdjk Apr 2014 #30
Whatever it is you are using to judge this public safety message ad campaign. VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #36
And hell the anti gun people are proud of not knowing anything about that which they want to ban clffrdjk Apr 2014 #38
No I am not saying it SHOULD have depicted that....I am saying...if NO creative license VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #40
Ok one more time clffrdjk Apr 2014 #42
to convey a safety message perhaps? VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #49
So how did showing a cartridge leaving the barrel clffrdjk Apr 2014 #50
because people unfamiliar with guns wouldn't know that perhaps? VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #57
The target audience is not capable of using context clues? clffrdjk Apr 2014 #58
No the target audience might not know as much about individual weapons and ammunition...no VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #109
Look if you want me to walk you through the process of using context clues clffrdjk Apr 2014 #176
Maybe only a few saw that DashOneBravo Apr 2014 #59
the basic understanding you NEED is that GUNS KILL people.... VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #110
If the people that poster is attempting to reach are as oblivious about how guns work Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #108
So ONLY people who already have guns buy new ones? VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #111
If I wanted to buy a gun I would assume Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #115
Like I said....if you want these Ads to be Literal....then they VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #117
"show things like an abusive husband shooting his abused wife" Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #119
We are talking about THIS ad. That is ANTI gun.... VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #121
from a blog post by someone whose views on guns are probably closer to yours than mine gejohnston Apr 2014 #122
I HAVE been raped....AND no one ever told me to do those things... VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #123
Didn't go to school in Colorado? gejohnston Apr 2014 #127
"Are you expecting EVERYONE to support gun ownership?" Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #125
Funny how its only "stupid" to the gun "enthusiasts" VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #129
Entire cartridges flying out of pistol muzzles is stupid. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #132
Creative License....ever heard of it? VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #146
You have your blood lust, don't you? Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #148
I am not the one that thinks more guns are the answer.... VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #150
Be honest. You want a blanket prohibition. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #157
you just inadvertently gave up the whole game.. SQUEE Apr 2014 #112
What? Uh no....not everyone who doesn't own a gun is "ignorant and fearful" VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #113
none of mine have, SQUEE Apr 2014 #114
A bit of a tangent regarding the "my guns haven't killed anyone" catchphrase: Jgarrick Apr 2014 #116
Wow....just wow..... VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #120
how many Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #139
I am from South Carolina.... VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #141
Not yet..... VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #118
Really? Straw Man Apr 2014 #124
All of them lock their weapons? VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #142
Yes. Lock all weapons ... Straw Man Apr 2014 #164
And who's to say you won't get drunk and slaughter a family of 4 in your car? Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #133
or ban cars Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #138
Has your pea shooter been banned yet? VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #144
I did not require a background check Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #152
but you DID have to take a test and YOU must renew...AND you MUST VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #154
lets see Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #160
because I don't drink VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #143
People who think entire cartridges come out of guns shouldn't lecture about "common sense." Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #145
the person who did the artwork....is not the person creating the actual laws..... VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #147
Lemme guess, you also think rifles that only fire single shots are "military assault rifles." Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #149
Frankly I don't care..... VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #151
I don't worship them either. i can count on my fingers the number of times I've been shooting Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #155
we do Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #153
Obviously we DON'T VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #156
just keep adding more Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #158
How many traffic laws do you think there are? VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #159
the number of states and territories there are gejohnston Apr 2014 #161
Yes and much of the traffic laws you obey ARE States rules.....States also VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #162
No they don't gejohnston Apr 2014 #163
No it doesn't... VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #165
Grossly misinformed? Straw Man Apr 2014 #166
Yes that IS exactly what I WAS talking about (as I recall I mentioned it first) VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #167
So you admit ... Straw Man Apr 2014 #169
I gave an essay, although incomplete, answer to a question gejohnston Apr 2014 #168
Six words for you: Cannabis legalization at the state level friendly_iconoclast Apr 2014 #175
I am FOR it at the FEDERAL Level.... VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #178
if you have to ask gejohnston Apr 2014 #182
Who accused someone of being racist? VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #183
you accused me gejohnston Apr 2014 #185
I think a little reading for YOU is in order... VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #184
here is my proof gejohnston Apr 2014 #186
Yes I know what it means..... VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #187
no, I didn't think you were aware gejohnston Apr 2014 #188
then you were also wrong not to..... VanillaRhapsody Apr 2014 #189
My 'test'??? SeattleVet Apr 2014 #62
There ya go. Proof that there's no gun violence in America! Scuba Apr 2014 #11
probably intentionally done that way jimmy the one Apr 2014 #12
It also speaks to the blatant disregard of truth and reality, as well as geckosfeet Apr 2014 #13
If you are going to use acronyms try and use them correctly clffrdjk Apr 2014 #20
you're fucking hilarious.... nothing as sick as laughing about something like this bowens43 Apr 2014 #15
Nope. Do you? Jgarrick Apr 2014 #16
no, but I do think that gejohnston Apr 2014 #17
What a disgusting post. SecularMotion Apr 2014 #18
If you believe that, then alert and take your chances with a jury. IronGate Apr 2014 #19
The jury on the OP was a 4-3 Leave petronius Apr 2014 #22
Thanks. IronGate Apr 2014 #23
"Disgusting" for pointing out the sheer ignorance of advocates of civilian disarmament? Jgarrick Apr 2014 #21
civilian disarmament? mikeysnot Apr 2014 #34
Safe act. clffrdjk Apr 2014 #35
Nice link! mikeysnot Apr 2014 #63
You said name a bill I did exactly as you asked. clffrdjk Apr 2014 #77
punt? mikeysnot Apr 2014 #81
Google too complex? Here you go clffrdjk Apr 2014 #88
Common courtesy to complex for you? mikeysnot Apr 2014 #98
Lol clffrdjk Apr 2014 #105
many of the bills sponsored by gejohnston Apr 2014 #54
Link, mikeysnot Apr 2014 #64
Given that I have a C&R FFL and have passed the background check to acquire a silencer, I think I'm Jgarrick Apr 2014 #67
I'm sorry where does it state civil disarmament? mikeysnot Apr 2014 #69
if the SAFE Act was so reasonable gejohnston Apr 2014 #72
Get a law degree mikeysnot Apr 2014 #73
that's not an answer gejohnston Apr 2014 #75
"Various police agencies already said they will not enforce it." mikeysnot Apr 2014 #83
Not doing their jobs gejohnston Apr 2014 #87
If the SAFE Act were to be passed in my state, I would be forced to dispose of most Jgarrick Apr 2014 #74
But but banning guns and forcing people to dispose of them is not disarmament!! clffrdjk Apr 2014 #78
Is this the provision that you are afraid of? mikeysnot Apr 2014 #86
Asking for a name of a bill because you don't think someone could possibly find one. clffrdjk Apr 2014 #89
Cry baby. mikeysnot Apr 2014 #96
Seriously? clffrdjk Apr 2014 #104
Song for your blues... mikeysnot Apr 2014 #200
Good luck with your BS dude... mikeysnot Apr 2014 #170
Stay classy "dude". (NT) blueridge3210 Apr 2014 #172
right back at ya! mikeysnot Apr 2014 #195
What discussion have I disrupted? clffrdjk Apr 2014 #177
So you are a true believer... mikeysnot Apr 2014 #196
I am busy what do you want? clffrdjk Apr 2014 #201
really? mikeysnot Apr 2014 #202
Was that supposed to make sense? clffrdjk Apr 2014 #203
Have someone explain it to you... mikeysnot Apr 2014 #205
Hey everybody, does anyone know what he is trying to get at? clffrdjk Apr 2014 #207
maybe one of your sycophantic gun nut supports could help you out here and laugh at your stupid Joke mikeysnot Apr 2014 #208
Rough day? clffrdjk Apr 2014 #210
no? mikeysnot Apr 2014 #212
do you know what an "assault weapon" is? gejohnston Apr 2014 #90
typical... mikeysnot Apr 2014 #97
here you go Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #95
Like this? Straw Man Apr 2014 #107
Sounds reasonable to me. mikeysnot Apr 2014 #179
Just where is the limit on reasonable? clffrdjk Apr 2014 #180
So then ... Straw Man Apr 2014 #181
Come on now. clffrdjk Apr 2014 #190
".357 rounds in a long barrel rifle" being too much firepower to entrust to an honest citizen, Jgarrick Apr 2014 #193
so registration = confiscation? mikeysnot Apr 2014 #82
Are you not familiar with the SAFE Act? Residents of NY are not allowed to keep previously Jgarrick Apr 2014 #84
Cry me a river... mikeysnot Apr 2014 #85
Yep no movement here clffrdjk Apr 2014 #91
You're a very good advocate for the 2A. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #92
Thank you! mikeysnot Apr 2014 #99
I agree. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #100
Be licensed and insured. mikeysnot Apr 2014 #101
Only if it is also required for voting and publishing as well. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #103
That's your opinion... mikeysnot Apr 2014 #171
So couple "well-regulated" with the part you forget -- Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #174
and yes, when that amendment was written mikeysnot Apr 2014 #194
"we had muskets... so sure carry all the muskets you want." Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #197
oh the "moving the goal post" gun nut meme... mikeysnot Apr 2014 #198
"again... so tired no matter how many times you moved the goal post." Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #204
and you always leave out the dot, dot dot well regulated part... mikeysnot Apr 2014 #206
Okay. My proposed regulation -- Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #209
add 10 round magazines to this and I am cool with it. mikeysnot Apr 2014 #211
10 rounds is not the most practical limit. Extensive military experience shows 30 rounds is optimal. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #213
30 rounds is for people with mikeysnot Apr 2014 #214
"30 rounds is for people with bad aim" Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #215
Police not private citizens mikeysnot Apr 2014 #216
If 30 rounds is the sign of bad aim why are police issued 30-round magazines? Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #217
Becasue they are part of the "Well regulated Militia" mikeysnot Apr 2014 #219
And people like *you* always leave out... friendly_iconoclast Apr 2014 #221
Ah, moving the Goal posts you are! mikeysnot May 2014 #240
That makes no sense. You're just reflexively bleating. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #222
cough "well regulated" cough mikeysnot Apr 2014 #223
What happened to the "militia" part you were so fond of and Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #227
Here you go, so you are on the same page as the rest of us... mikeysnot May 2014 #229
Your turn -- Nuclear Unicorn May 2014 #232
Thanks for proving my point! mikeysnot May 2014 #233
They are not militia, they are police. Nuclear Unicorn May 2014 #234
Fail. mikeysnot May 2014 #235
No! You! Nuclear Unicorn May 2014 #236
"Doubling down on EPIC fail mikeysnot May 2014 #238
The police are not the militia. Nuclear Unicorn May 2014 #242
Looks like it to me in the modern context mikeysnot May 2014 #244
Federal law has defined who is part of the militia; not your personal, self-serving silliness. Nuclear Unicorn May 2014 #250
What actions in Boston is it that you were against? Jenoch Apr 2014 #218
Where were you? mikeysnot Apr 2014 #225
The authorities in Atlanta had no idea where to search. Jenoch Apr 2014 #226
Really, huh... mikeysnot May 2014 #231
The police are a militia? Straw Man Apr 2014 #220
life must be hard for you...? mikeysnot Apr 2014 #224
I have no idea what you're talking about ... Straw Man Apr 2014 #228
Of course you don't know... mikeysnot May 2014 #230
I know that very well. Straw Man May 2014 #237
Way past that dude... mikeysnot May 2014 #239
So, dude ... Straw Man May 2014 #241
No I don't, but at least mikeysnot May 2014 #245
Responsible to the law? Straw Man May 2014 #246
Serve and protect... mikeysnot May 2014 #247
Exactly. Straw Man May 2014 #248
The police have no duty to protect the individual. oneshooter May 2014 #249
No, you're not... derby378 Apr 2014 #191
It is obvious that you have no idea what you are talking about. mikeysnot Apr 2014 #199
So you *do* now acknowledge that the SAFE Act is a civilian disarmament measure? Jgarrick Apr 2014 #106
He has no choice but to do just that derby378 Apr 2014 #192
Not a mistake. Just the usual studied ignorance. Eleanors38 Apr 2014 #24
Uhm yeah, because technical accuracy would help to better spread the message? Democracyinkind Apr 2014 #28
It's sad that... deathrind Apr 2014 #29
What simple common sense regulation/legislation is it promoting? clffrdjk Apr 2014 #31
Read for yourself. deathrind Apr 2014 #43
Well at least this time you got the right answer for what this add is promoting. clffrdjk Apr 2014 #48
What's wrong with promoting Republican power-mad billionaires on a liberal forum? Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2014 #93
Oh Jeezus gimme a frickin break tularetom Apr 2014 #33
I believe nit-picking about the technical accuracy is a tried and true way of derailing a thread. djean111 Apr 2014 #76
It is not possible that "nit-picking about the technical accuracy..." Jenoch Apr 2014 #79
I think so Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #39
Beat me to it. We really need a qualifying exam before we let people create new legislation. nt NYC_SKP Apr 2014 #45
and they never learn Duckhunter935 Apr 2014 #46
Can I get it in pink, please? NYC_SKP Apr 2014 #52
Heretic! Jgarrick Apr 2014 #55
A: Yes ileus Apr 2014 #53
We have the technology. 65% more bullet, per bullet!!! NYC_SKP Apr 2014 #56
Reminds me of the guy who bought a house near a shooting range. Straw Man Apr 2014 #61
Maybe it's the new MIRV rifle! Eleanors38 Apr 2014 #71
best criticism from someone who hates the NRA and Ted Nugent gejohnston Apr 2014 #94
I want to carry around a bottle of the Ebola Virus, tiz my new hobby, OK with you folks? randys1 Apr 2014 #126
being absurd destroys your argument gejohnston Apr 2014 #128
You are consistent, wrong about absolutely everything. randys1 Apr 2014 #130
He seems to be doing fine do far. (NT) blueridge3210 Apr 2014 #134
name one thing I got wrong, gejohnston Apr 2014 #135
Your entire post is your rightwing opinions about guns and meaningless randys1 Apr 2014 #137
for example? gejohnston Apr 2014 #140
This message was self-deleted by its author blueridge3210 Apr 2014 #136
How exactly are you going to use that bottle of Ebola to defend yourself? Bazinga Apr 2014 #173
Not to complecate things further, but SFangel May 2014 #243
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Is Everytown For Gun Safe...»Reply #96