Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Letterman Throws Down on Guns: 'For the Love of Christ! When Are We Gonna Do Something?' [View all]beevul
(12,194 posts)70. Its still a bullshit claim.
"My point was Jenoch shared a right wing talking point."
That, is still a bullshit claim. Pointing out potential hypocrisy is neither left nor right wing.
"Such an argument has been used for guns, and also to attack people like Michael Moore and Warren Buffet. "He criticizes the wealthy...isn't he wealthy? What a hypocrite hurr durr."
Again, that is still a bullshit claim. Pointing out potential hypocrisy is neither left nor right wing.
Some of us make no special "allowances" or believe in using discretion when it comes to people on our side.
Get over it.
Moving on, if you're going to use the word "potential" then explain how Letterman could "potentially" be a hypocrite...because right now all you have is a baseless accusation.
I never accused the man of anything, baseless or otherwise.
"So, because gun control failed to stop the recent shooting in CA we should consider if gun control works at all? Look even if gun control advocates achieved everything they wanted, eliminating gun violence entirely would be impossible. What we can do is work at making those instances of gun-violence as rare as possible. That's what gun-control is about."
In CA, they pretty much DO have everything they want. And, so many of the hard pushing "gun violence prevention" types see it as a road that runs through the rights of people who don't and wont commit acts of gun violence.
"That the law-abiding gun owner might be inconvenienced is just par for the course. Would I like to avoid going to the DMV every few years to get my license renewed? Of course I would, but I understand that the system makes the road safer for everyone. Gun control regulations are the same way."
Your license applies only to use of motor vehicles in public. Not to ownership or use on private property.
You folks want licenses for ownership.
With that said, why should we put the Hughes Amendment back on the table? Why should citizens have access to fully automatic firearms? As for concealed and carry, I'm happy with leaving that up to the individual state to decide.
As I suspected.
You see no reason to discuss what many on the other side see as greivances.
Why then, should you be surprised when nobody wants to compromise anymore?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
112 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Letterman Throws Down on Guns: 'For the Love of Christ! When Are We Gonna Do Something?' [View all]
SecularMotion
Jun 2014
OP
And of course group think can only affect one side, oddly every time, that being the side
A Simple Game
Jun 2014
#52
But I see many posts that are just put up for consideration without any comment
A Simple Game
Jun 2014
#86
If the gun industry would sensibily regulate their market it just might make a change.
Thinkingabout
Jun 2014
#4
You should not have to ask this question. If you can not look and see where the
Thinkingabout
Jun 2014
#6
If you can't articulate specifically what you want, then why should you be listened to?
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2014
#11
The NRA would love that- they're the biggest seller of gun insurance in the US
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2014
#13
That doesn't answer our question- what sensible regulations do you want?
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2014
#45
it's not all about getting guns all the time - controls on guns does not meet people still can't
samsingh
Jun 2014
#84
Only if those same elites were opposed to others having a driver's license.
blueridge3210
Jun 2014
#93
What's clearer is a willful ignorance of the subject on which you pontificate...
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2014
#82
armed security guards for protection are not the same as having every imbecile armed with guns
samsingh
Jun 2014
#34
Nothing will move forward until Democratic politicians stand up to the NRA.
Oakenshield
Jun 2014
#53
I really like Cooper. He comes off not just intelligent, but professionally honest in these
AtheistCrusader
Jun 2014
#102