A closer look: How many school shootings since Newtown?

[gejohnston]

55. can't dispute the scholarship, attack the person.

really classy.

Huh? another non sequitur? another false dilemma? another logic fallacy from Johnston?
Where is your explanation of what the 40% 'Saturday night special' is? You've done nothing but accomplish a trifecta: tapdancing, smoke & mirrors, & double double talk talk, all emanating from one thread.

No, you said the time to crime was bullshit, I proved my claim. You have proven nothing other than your very verbose double talk. Unless your reading comprehension is very poor, you know that as well as I do.

Furthermore, the ATF demonstrates what I said was spot on, for of the 891 firearm traces it lists on pg 7 of what you linked to, 488 of them were from neighboring states of Virginia & Md, just like I said, the rest evidently from all the other states combined.
What exactly was your link to the ATF supposed to prove? don't just link to a website as a rebuttal & expect everyone to realize wtf you're referring to, thanks.

I never said they didn't. What I did say was that the time to crime supported my theft theory than your straw purchase/violating the Gun Control Act theory. One more thing, if they are buying the guns in Virginia, why aren't they committing the crimes there?

Oh vomit, & you cite a far right gunnut guru to claim that burger (my signature line at bottom) was spouting nonsense? From YOU, who generally admonishes a left wing source but has no problem citing a far right one? Hilarious, sad at the same time.

A taste of the specious fractured reasoning from gunnut kopel:
kopel: ... Justice Burger then stated that today, "sadly, we have no choice but to maintain a standing national army while still maintaining a 'militia' by way of the National Guard..." Here, Justice Burger's reasoning stumbled. First of all, the National Guard is plainly not the "militia" envisioned by the Second Amendment.

Duh, burger never said the national gds was the 2ndA's envisioned militia, & burger definitely knows that it isn't, kopel is a sanctimonious casuistic clown.
But to wit, kopel, the national guards is indeed a militia, as defined in the Charles dick militia act of 1903; in fact nat gds is the only 'well regulated militia' in existence in America today (plus state guards which are patterned after national gds), so what burger said makes sense unless one tries to twist it out of shape as kopel did..

kopel: More fundamentally, the National Guard is a uniformed, elite force. A "select militia" was precisely what the authors of the Second Amendment intended to avoid; they instead wanted a militia made up of all able-bodied males.

Here the grand gunnut kopel attempts to make it seem that justice burger was unaware of all the simple pie he spits out in kopel's 'refutal', when it's just a pathetic attempt from kopel to denigrate burger & what he said & meant, whether to parade magazine or playboy wouldn't have mattered, it's what he said not who he said it to.

Instead of countering the scholarship, all you have is a personal attack of what you think Kopel's happens to be. That is the lowest logical fallacy of all. Well regulated means well equipped. It is also can become a branch of the federal government anytime the POTUS wants it to be, therefore it is not a state militia. That is the only point you have, and it is only half way valid.
Where Burger said it doesn't matter as much as where Burger never said it, that was Kopel's point, and you know that unless you flunked the 8th grade five times.

So, your derailing is to personally attack on me for something that was basically accurate shows desperation, like the lies exposed in the OP by even CNN.