Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

spin

(17,493 posts)
49. Our of curiosity where were you living in 1950s ...
Tue Jan 6, 2015, 03:38 PM
Jan 2015

You state:


And it was indeed prudent for gun owners to be quiet about their gun ownership back then, even to the 1950's, since gun owners were then considered radical - parents would advise children to cross the street walking home from school, if a known gun owner was on the route.


I was living in Ohio in the 1950s and almost everybody had a shotgun or rifle in their home. Nobody ever felt gun owners were "radical" or worried about their kids walking past or being in a home with firearms. Most of my friends owned a .22 caliber rifle and had learned gun safety from their parents.

I seriously doubt that you knew many gun owners in the 1950s and still don't.

I am not misinforming readers about the percentage of gun owners in our nation. It's far higher than you wish. As I said it has increased since 1973 and is now most likely around 60%. Firearms sales have absolutely skyrocketed in the last couple of decades and show no signs of slowing down. I see a lot of first time gun owners at the ranges I shoot at and often help them learn the basics of accurate shooting.

I also understand statistics and I realize that garbage in means garbage out. Since a significant percentage of gun owners like me are willing to lie to any surveyor who knocks on our door or calls on the phone, any statistics on gun owners are questionable at best.

But you will agrue that what I am saying is just my opinion.

The (in)accuracy of gun ownership surveys
POSTED BY DAVID HARDY · 1 DECEMBER 2014 11:05 AM

It's been widely assumed that telephone surveys of gun owners understate the real numbers, because some proportion of them are reluctant to disclose ownership to a stranger. I recently found two pieces of research on the question.

Arthur L. Kellerman, et al., Validating Survey Responses to Questions About Gun Ownership Among Owners of Registered Handguns, 131 J. OF EPIDEMOLOGY 1084 (1990)... yes, that Kellermann. They surveyed 35 households in Seattle and Memphis (I wasn't aware that either had registration) who had a handgun registered to them. 31 said that they did have a gun, 1 denied ever having had one, and 3 said they'd had one, but didn't now (which the study counts as a valid answer, but I'd classify it as fishy, at least). So 3% gave an incorrect answer and 9% gave a fishy one.

Ann C. Rafferty, et al., Validity of a Household Gun Question in a Telephone Survey, 110 PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS 282 (1995). A larger sample (around 190) of households that have a registered handgun, or had a hunting license. 13% of the first and 10% of the second denied owning any type of gun.

These suggest that telephone surveys result in numbers that are significantly too low, as by an eighth to a tenth, even when the ownership is completely legal.
http://armsandthelaw.com/archives/2014/12/the_inaccuracy_.php



11:30 pm ET
Mar 22, 2013 POLITICS

Guns Present Polling Conundrum

***snip***

Questions about gun ownership don’t fit neatly into typical polling categories, pollsters say. On the one hand, the question of whether the respondent owns a gun, or whether there is a gun in the respondent’s home, should be “really cut-and-dry,” Dimock said. But some guns may have been inherited and may hardly be used. “It’s there but not present in people’s mind or their lives,” he said.

Who answers the phone in the household could affect responses. “We know that in a survey where respondents are randomly selected from adults in the household, a household headed by a married couple is substantially more likely to report guns in the home if the husband is selected than if the wife is selected,” said Philip Cook, an economist and gun-violence researcher at Duke University.

Also, some gun owners may be reluctant to tell researchers they own guns, because of legal and political considerations, which makes the question more like behavioral or attitudinal questions than like questions that ask basic facts about respondents. “This is an unusual demographic-type question,” said Frank Newport, editor-in-chief of Gallup.

That is the argument cited by those who think Gallup’s higher counts for gun ownership are more realistic than lower counts from the General Social Survey, which is run out of NORC, an affiliate research institution at the University of Chicago. Gallup’s survey, and some others that count more gun owners, are conducted over the phone, while the GSS is fielded in person.

“People are very reluctant to admit they own guns in phone surveys,” said Andrew Arulanandam, spokesman for the National Rifle Association, which uses Gallup’s numbers, not GSS’s. “We suspect they would probably be more reluctant to disclose that to someone at their front door asking them pretty personal questions.”(...emphasis added)
http://blogs.wsj.com/numbers/guns-present-polling-conundrum-1223/

What does the chart sarisataka Dec 2014 #1
I know you folk hate that chart so I put it up...... even though it is totally unrelated to gun control. Fred Sanders Dec 2014 #2
I do dislike the chart sarisataka Dec 2014 #4
It is a disingenuous chart hack89 Dec 2014 #8
It is so in your face true and irrefutable and horrible it is hard to say much, I get it. Fred Sanders Dec 2014 #9
It shows a steadily declining murder rate hack89 Dec 2014 #10
OP fails to adjust for population growth, deceptive chart shows only total deaths. NYC_SKP Dec 2014 #16
"not perfect" = "flawed"? Straw Man Dec 2014 #3
The Anti-Cilvil liberty folks.. virginia mountainman Dec 2014 #6
LOL I wonder when all the "flawed" data.. virginia mountainman Dec 2014 #5
guns don't have rights....as progressives we need to support basic human rights. ileus Dec 2014 #7
Apparently, deaths by both have been falling. That's very good news. NYC_SKP Dec 2014 #11
Now I know why you hate charts, you can not read them! Fred Sanders Dec 2014 #14
Do some math. Are those deaths per 100,000 or total deaths? NYC_SKP Dec 2014 #15
Not just hard, it's really nuts discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2015 #34
The headline seems to overstate what Pew actually 'admitted' - it's not a perfect petronius Dec 2014 #12
Rights are not subject to opinion polls. Nuclear Unicorn Dec 2014 #13
PEW: US Gun Death Rates roughly HALF what 1993 Rates were. NYC_SKP Dec 2014 #17
A per capita chart and a whole numbers chart are not tweaks, they are different charts. Fred Sanders Dec 2014 #18
Wow you really need help with statistics, don't you? NYC_SKP Dec 2014 #19
Well then you should speak to a mod about the article as you describe it, is there one around? Fred Sanders Dec 2014 #20
You're very coy. We don't have mods and your graph is crap. NYC_SKP Dec 2014 #21
More from PEW: Good news, progress for progressive gun rights supporters! From the OP sources! NYC_SKP Dec 2014 #22
gun ownership rates declined along with gun homicide rates jimmy the one Dec 2014 #23
The ownership numbers are suspect. People unlikely to self-report ownership, distrustful of Gov. NYC_SKP Dec 2014 #25
In 1973 when the survey was taken that showed 49% of people had a firearm in their ... spin Dec 2014 #29
lying skills demonstration jimmy the one Jan 2015 #37
Are you accusing Spin of lying? Of being on drugs or alcohol? GGJohn Jan 2015 #38
freedom of spitch jimmy the one Jan 2015 #40
You don't have freedom of speech on a private website. GGJohn Jan 2015 #42
lying skills demonstration, demonstrated jimmy the one Jan 2015 #45
Sorry, but the only weird logic here is yours if you think you have freedom of speech on this site. GGJohn Jan 2015 #46
alive & well jimmy the one Jan 2015 #51
at least the RKBA side Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #54
sanctuaries can be created jimmy the one Jan 2015 #55
As I said before Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #56
I rarely lie but I do spin. (n/t) spin Jan 2015 #50
Eh? Straw Man Jan 2015 #43
Laughable. Utterly laughable. beevul Jan 2015 #47
I really think he does believe the bull execrement he's shoveling here. eom GGJohn Jan 2015 #48
nixon in 1971, on revolvers & handguns jimmy the one Jan 2015 #52
It sounds like the main difference... beevul Jan 2015 #53
Our of curiosity where were you living in 1950s ... spin Jan 2015 #49
Read it & weep, 2ndA mythology exposed jimmy the one Dec 2014 #24
My post above puts your little claims to shames, Jimmy. NYC_SKP Dec 2014 #26
PS, what are the self-reported rates for illicit drug ownership? Kinky porn ownership? NYC_SKP Dec 2014 #27
Notice how gun fun men reject all facts, which are all facts, contrary to their set in metal beliefs, Fred Sanders Dec 2014 #28
Like the OP sarisataka Dec 2014 #30
The OP is quite willing to accept poll results without question- when he *agrees* with the results: friendly_iconoclast Jan 2015 #36
Notice how Gallup survey shows 2014 has lowest number of "no guns in home" reponses in 20 years? NYC_SKP Dec 2014 #31
You mean now today ownership is higher than in 1983, and many recent years also, that "trend"? Fred Sanders Dec 2014 #32
No, I mean the Gallup survey shows 2014 has lowest number of "no guns in home" reponses in 20 years. NYC_SKP Dec 2014 #33
So gun PURCHASES are UP while gun HOUSEHOLDS are DOWN Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2015 #35
switch to semi autos jimmy the one Jan 2015 #39
Snarkiness aside. GGJohn Jan 2015 #41
"Guns are being sold more & more to the same gun owners." Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2015 #44
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Pew Research Admits Flaw ...»Reply #49