Gun Control & RKBA

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)

3. I've never heard that fourth one, but the others are common in various forms. nt

Reply to Scuba (Reply #1)

Tue Jan 13, 2015, 11:47 AM

Jan 2015

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

71 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

A psychiatrist Examines The Anti-Gun Mentality [View all] mog75 Jan 2015 OP

I've never heard the first, 3rd or 4th statement from anyone advocating limits on gun ownership. Scuba Jan 2015 #1

They are just mog75 Jan 2015 #2

Oh no, this post is definately in the right place. Scuba Jan 2015 #4

I've never heard that fourth one, but the others are common in various forms. nt NYC_SKP Jan 2015 #3

The second one is said and said because it is the one that is true. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #5

Link? mog75 Jan 2015 #6

Drink? Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #7

I do drink on special occasions. mog75 Jan 2015 #8

Didn't think so. mog75 Jan 2015 #9

Don't expect that one to answer. GGJohn Jan 2015 #10

I like to think of it as an unofficial block from the thread. beevul Jan 2015 #18

Hmmmm, that's a good way to look at it. GGJohn Jan 2015 #20

Yep, that tends to be how it works Duckhunter935 Jan 2015 #21

Yes, it's like Kryptonite. NaturalHigh Jan 2015 #25

Precisely. N/T beevul Jan 2015 #26

See my reply #1. Scuba Jan 2015 #19

Don't be so fucking lazy. Google three words" flamin lib Jan 2015 #58

I've seen 3 of the 4 at least, here on DU. N/T beevul Jan 2015 #14

utter rot jimmy the one Jan 2015 #11

No mog75 Jan 2015 #13

What about the reputation of the source link, you like the source? Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #16

The gun folks sources always link to rasical right wing and looney organizations and the NRA, it is thier Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #15

Please point out the part that is untrue and/or "rasical". Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2015 #34

lol. My Good Babushka Jan 2015 #27

"mog's link, therefore, is just typical rightwing propagunda" Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2015 #33

What can you say....2A regressives love the thought of a larger victim pool ileus Jan 2015 #12

You support the JPFO? Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #17

Do you support a woman's right to self defense? Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2015 #22

Your question is a humorless take on "When did you stop beating your wife"? Always hilarious. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #23

No, it's not. It's a straight up "yes" or "no" question. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2015 #28

Your one trick train wreck of illogic is endlessly amusing. Lots of other folks tell me that also. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #29

"Lots of other folks tell me that" Argumentum ad populum? Really? friendly_iconoclast Jan 2015 #30

"Your one trick train wreck of illogic is endlessly amusing." Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2015 #31

Truer words were never written in this group. beevul Jan 2015 #35

Just to be clear Neon Gods Jan 2015 #38

And your free speech isn't defined as internet access. So what's your point? Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2015 #39

Because you can support a woman's right to... Neon Gods Jan 2015 #40

So you support a woman's right to self-defense provided she only do so Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2015 #41

What I find truly strange... NaturalHigh Jan 2015 #24

As someone who supports effective gun control... Neon Gods Jan 2015 #32

Are you looking for sympathy from those of us who are incessantly labeled as Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2015 #36

No Neon Gods Jan 2015 #37

It's only a straw man argument if people aren't making that argument. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2015 #42

Anti-self defense? Neon Gods Jan 2015 #43

In the context of a population of 300 million, how many is "many"? beevul Jan 2015 #44

It depends on your definition of Neon Gods Jan 2015 #45

I was referring to otherwise law abiding citizens getting into shootouts. beevul Jan 2015 #46

How many is too many? Neon Gods Jan 2015 #49

Thats not an answer to "how many". N/T beevul Jan 2015 #57

You're right Neon Gods Jan 2015 #59

did you? gejohnston Jan 2015 #60

Posted without comment Neon Gods Jan 2015 #61

I read it gejohnston Jan 2015 #62

Impasse Neon Gods Jan 2015 #63

The difference is gejohnston Jan 2015 #65

Some folks have a liberal view because... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2015 #67

Sorry, I don't believe in the Easter Bunny either. Neon Gods Jan 2015 #68

I said mainstream criminology gejohnston Jan 2015 #69

"The Politico article is very clear, it makes sense, and it also agrees with pure common sense... friendly_iconoclast Jan 2015 #71

That "piece" bases its conclusion in large part, on an opinion. beevul Jan 2015 #66

If I told you exactly who rejects self defense my post would be hidden. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2015 #47

Really? Neon Gods Jan 2015 #48

Paul Quander sarisataka Jan 2015 #50

Sigh Neon Gods Jan 2015 #54

Really. It was denounced as vigilantism. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2015 #52

Defending oneself from harm is Neon Gods Jan 2015 #55

Not really here to argue guns, but... credible psychiatrists don't diagnose "mentalities." enki23 Jan 2015 #51

It's not mentality Politicalboi Jan 2015 #53

How many times have you been shot? Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2015 #56

Maybe he/she doesn't want to wait... Neon Gods Jan 2015 #64

The he/she should confine his/herself to his/her home. Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2015 #70