Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Gun control for, "wealthy, white individuals who wish to be safe" Wow, just frickin' wow! [View all]hack89
(39,181 posts)275. So if we don't give up our guns we support killing babies?
is that really your logic?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
310 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Gun control for, "wealthy, white individuals who wish to be safe" Wow, just frickin' wow! [View all]
DonP
Feb 2015
OP
I don't support the killing of humans unless they are trying to kill other humans.
Veganstein
Feb 2015
#16
Which shows that a tiny tiny minority of legal gun owners will ever kill someone
hack89
Feb 2015
#23
right...and 75% of the children dying of gunshot wounds....Live with them!
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2015
#266
Well you could argue guns were created for both killing animals and humans, but American humans
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#26
and sherrifs in the old west.....made gunslingers turn over their guns in town
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2015
#270
but "unnecessary" (your word) harm to humans...you have no problem with THAT!
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2015
#14
and I gave you homicide and chilrens deaths from gunshot statistics from the CDC...SO????
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2015
#32
There is no coherent response to those facts. It destroys their entire self defence foundation.
Fred Sanders
Feb 2015
#77
Looks like your attempt to Lovejoy the conversation isn't going too well...
friendly_iconoclast
Feb 2015
#33
No bad taste here....I was the one that said it....I think I know what I said and meant...
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2015
#42
the subject remains the same as when I started....YOU changed the subject my friend
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2015
#106
Alcohol kills 4300 underaged drinkers every year. That's 3.75 Sandy Hooks a week.
Nuclear Unicorn
Feb 2015
#113
How little YOU are willing to face facts....Sensible Gun control is coming....just like Winter is on
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2015
#71
what other alternative is there? Sensible gun control IS coming....take it to the bank!
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2015
#74
People like you and me need a time machine, if we had one and it worked
NoJusticeNoPeace
Feb 2015
#81
It is not odd if you take leave of all common sense and logic and facts. Then it sounds dandy.
Fred Sanders
Feb 2015
#88
Funny....people in other countries are not as afraid for their defense as some gun toting Americans
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2015
#112
Gun safety education could lower those numbers,with essentially no resistance from the pro-gun side.
beevul
Feb 2015
#151
I guess firearms safety training isn't as important to you as you led us to believe.
beevul
Feb 2015
#160
It SHOULD be important enough for you to own them....that YOU pay for it!
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2015
#162
so it wasn't about 20 yr olds dying in their homes...it was about those under 14...try not to be
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2015
#182
Lets check the executive summary of the document and where they got data...
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2015
#150
a vegan gungeoneer IS hypocrisy....he said himself he was concerned about
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2015
#141
yeah says me....I already paid for YOUR kids education...I have no children
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2015
#167
Love to, but unreasonable absolutist gun control zealots oppose universal gun safety training.
beevul
Feb 2015
#172
Yeah I do....and I just posted two different polls....that show the opposite of what Pew said...
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2015
#179
Everyone that actively posts on DU including this group, believe in some sort of gun control.
beevul
Feb 2015
#284
and a 3 yr old.....is that old enough for you to be comfortable with it?
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2015
#191
No it isn't....lived my entire life....even as a female...without one!
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2015
#207
and if people want a Sawwed off shotgun...or a rocket fired grenade launcher...
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2015
#239
Have you ever met a gun owner that admitted they weren't "responsible"
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2015
#252
Have you ever met a "reasonable" gun control proponent that admitted they weren't reasonable?
beevul
Feb 2015
#254
"Just wanting something" is not a good enough reason to own something that DESTROYS LIFE!"
beevul
Feb 2015
#247
Bullshit. This is not a safe haven Group for gun lovers only. You only wish it were. nt
Electric Monk
Feb 2015
#229
You're wrong again. Here's the GC &RKBA SOP that VanillaRhapsody was *not* violating.
Electric Monk
Feb 2015
#236
How many posts would you like me to link to where no attempt at discussion was made eh?
beevul
Feb 2015
#238
No....but a person who IS a V.E.G.A.N. and concerned with the "unnecessary" killing of animals
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2015
#170
Awww did I hurt your feelings....did you have to hold your weapon closer to your heart when I said
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2015
#257
and VEGANS do care what OTHER people are doing....they don't even use animal products!
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2015
#250
None of which contradicts, or even touches on, anything I said in the post you responded to. N/T
beevul
Feb 2015
#260
Just like he said....he is a vegan concerned about "the unnecessary killing of animals"
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2015
#142
Remember, you're dealing with a poster that opposes universal gun safety training.
beevul
Feb 2015
#178
Then why are you arguing with the one person in this thread that DOES support
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2015
#297
No it isn't that means ones not already bombed into the StoneAge by wars etc.
VanillaRhapsody
Feb 2015
#290
They insist they are true liberals, but there is no evidence of it. Who else requires no evidence?
Fred Sanders
Feb 2015
#75