Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
Showing Original Post only (View all)The gun control argument you never see presented [View all]
You don't need a gun. Law enforcement has a proven track record that shows they respond promptly and decisively to budding crimes. Response times have decreased so dramatically that you can often have a police officer on-scene sooner than you could run to the bedroom to retrieve a pistol from storage.
Moreover, the police have shown themselves to be courteous, service-minded professionals that work towards bettering their communities. They take seriously their sacred charge to serve and protect the citizens of their districts.
All in all, the ability of the police to interdict criminals before any real harm can be done is high enough to make the risks associated with gun ownership substantially higher than the risks of summoning the police and patiently awaiting their immediate arrival.
I would think this would be the best argument out there. Yet, no one seems to argue that point.
I wonder why that is?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
28 replies, 3551 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
28 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Instead, we're told to accept yahoos like Ready, Zimmerman, Dunnachie and Hicks...
stone space
Feb 2015
#8
What do you care? You aren't worried about the Hicks' of the world. The only people you
Nuclear Unicorn
Feb 2015
#13
Now that's a detour into oncoming traffic. None of us want protection from other owners.
NYC_SKP
Feb 2015
#15
Yeah? And who would those "some here support their right to terrorize their neighbors?"
GGJohn
Mar 2015
#19
I know that impression exists but I challenge you to find an example of anyone here.....
NYC_SKP
Mar 2015
#20
You weren't there, I wasn't there. Also, the plural of "gun" is "guns", not "gunz".
NYC_SKP
Mar 2015
#23
Is there a particular law which, if in place, would have prevented this tragedy?
NYC_SKP
Mar 2015
#25