Gun Control & RKBA

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,798 posts)

36. Five members...

Mon Mar 23, 2015, 08:19 AM

Mar 2015

Last edited Mon Mar 23, 2015, 10:43 AM - Edit history (1)

...the alerter and four jurors, thought I was "disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate" and I didn't use that word. I was told I was divisive for suggesting that working together rather than slinging insults was a good idea. Someone else own up to abusing the jury system and voting to hide anything pro-RKBA. Lastly one juror decided that being critical of applauding the idea of "whatever pisses off the NRA is good" is an attack.

This is a case of a group with little patch of skin and muscle waiting for a psychosomatic bruise.
I'm just glad I could be of service to them.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

62 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Point proven I'd say n/t [View all] discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2015 OP

You know you're over the target... beevul Mar 2015 #1

But the irony is worth it all discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2015 #2

This is about your hidden thread, I take it? Electric Monk Mar 2015 #3

Of course it wasn't you discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2015 #4

This message was self-deleted by its author Duckhunter935 Mar 2015 #8

I wish you could say the same thing on my post Duckhunter935 Mar 2015 #10

Wow, that was a bit uncalled for. krispos42 Mar 2015 #5

Well I know discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2015 #6

Yes, that is true Duckhunter935 Mar 2015 #9

Actual progress on reducing viololent crime, ... not so important to some DonP Mar 2015 #12

It was never about "progress"... virginia mountainman Mar 2015 #18

IMHO... discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2015 #21

I feel for you as I have had some Duckhunter935 Mar 2015 #7

And the wise always share wisdom discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2015 #11

The one I saw was (paraphrase): I vote to hide ANY gungeoneer post. Eleanors38 Mar 2015 #39

As long as their "Victories" are limited to DU threads, I can live with the petty insults DonP Mar 2015 #40

I hope you are right. Democratic Party elites can't seem to resist the glance back at Sodom. Eleanors38 Mar 2015 #41

If they don't learn = pass the salt DonP Mar 2015 #42

I don't understand, GGJohn Mar 2015 #13

I'll second that. beevul Mar 2015 #14

See #15 discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2015 #16

The Jury on my post about "prigressives" (chuckle) discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2015 #15

I find the juries are somewhat biased Duckhunter935 Mar 2015 #17

Imagine yourself as a snake lover on a cat fancy website, so the juries have a pro-cat bias. Electric Monk Mar 2015 #19

I'd suggest that... discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2015 #20

Sorry but not even close Duckhunter935 Mar 2015 #22

What nonsense. beevul Mar 2015 #23

Read your own post, and reflect upon why juries will tend not to have your desired pro-gunner bias. Electric Monk Mar 2015 #24

What "desired" pro gun bias? beevul Mar 2015 #25

Yes, we all know how busy Duckhunter935 Mar 2015 #26

You're seriously sending folks unsoliticed pm's trying to hunt down the alerter? stone space Mar 2015 #53

I sent a nice PM just asking a question Duckhunter935 Mar 2015 #54

I'd ignore it. And if I sent one (or more, as you seem to have done), ... stone space Mar 2015 #56

I guess I was brought up different Duckhunter935 Mar 2015 #58

Not responding so such spam is not impolite. (nt) stone space Mar 2015 #59

not spam and yes it really is Duckhunter935 Mar 2015 #60

I sent only one, where do you come up with this? Duckhunter935 Mar 2015 #61

You faux-prigressive! NaturalHigh Mar 2015 #27

yep, sure is right, whoever juror 5 was Duckhunter935 Mar 2015 #28

Looks like #7 was confused about which group it was in. krispos42 Mar 2015 #32

I hate bad hide and corrupt juries Duckhunter935 Mar 2015 #33

maybe... discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2015 #34

The Monday morning quarterback analysis discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2015 #29

#7 is still not correct Duckhunter935 Mar 2015 #30

Not that I've seen either in this neck of the woods but... discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2015 #31

Yet, we're told elsewhere that it is rude to call them "controllers" Nuclear Unicorn Mar 2015 #35

Five members... discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2015 #36

Juror #8 agrees with Juror #7. Fred Sanders Mar 2015 #43

Really? discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2015 #44

BTW... discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2015 #46

Forget to mention - attributing quotes without disclosure of the author, and then attack the quote? Really? Fred Sanders Mar 2015 #48

On the contrary, flattered to be the subject of a whole post....and who can argue with the result? Fred Sanders Mar 2015 #50

I'm good with that. Pleasure working with you. discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2015 #51

The 2A is the only right where "progressive" = taking rights away. ileus Mar 2015 #37

I doubt I'll ever understand that either discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2015 #38

RKBA is a fundamental human right? Where'd you get that idea? It's not. Electric Monk Mar 2015 #45

Reflect on article 3 discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2015 #47

Banning 20 round and over mags (for example) would not be a "human rights violation". nt Electric Monk Mar 2015 #52

I do not have a problem banning magazines over 20 rounds Duckhunter935 Mar 2015 #55

Maybe or maybe not but... discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2015 #57

No, it's not a human rights violation. blueridge3210 Mar 2015 #62