Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
1. Let's take the militia clause as the controllers would prefer --
Tue Apr 7, 2015, 12:39 PM
Apr 2015

The right of the people to keep and bear arms is related service within the militia. Yet, one cannot serve in the militia unless they have the right to keep and bear arms. However, arms for the militia are supplied by the individual, not the government.

It's often said, "We don't need a militia because we're the sole superpower on the face of the Earth! 'MERICA!" Well, apart from the sudden and unexpected applause for the MIC from supposed Progressives it's hard to imagine any scenario where this is a permanent state of affairs. Other powers may arise. America may decline or simply elect to get out of the World Police business.

Similarly, it is current federal law that all able-bodied men 18 to 45 are considered members of the unorganized militia. Yes, you read that right -- the militia exists by federal mandate. Militias aren't just for federal purposes, it serves state and local governments as well, i.e. in the event of a major calamity such as hurricane that devastated Galveston Texas in 1900.

If the Controller interpretation is to be believed they would not be arguing for AWB bans but rather arguing for laws requiring all able-bodied citizens of military age to maintain "assault weapons" in serviceable order.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Countering the Heller dissent [View all] discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2015 OP
Let's take the militia clause as the controllers would prefer -- Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2015 #1
The Militia Act... discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2015 #2
Post removed Post removed Apr 2015 #4
"Ever male between 18 and 45 needs a metallic Dick." Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2015 #5
I don't think he'll be answering. blueridge3210 Apr 2015 #6
Yeah. I saw that. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2015 #7
well regulated and unorganized, explanations thereof jimmy the one Apr 2015 #9
How are unorganizd and well-regulated opposed to each other? Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2015 #11
GW & Hamilton, elitist anti rights gun control nazis jimmy the one Apr 2015 #12
correction gejohnston Apr 2015 #13
Where was this straw-man born? discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2015 #16
bogus quote alert; foot in mouth disease rampant jimmy the one Apr 2015 #17
jto: "A free people ought not only to be armed, but disciplined..." discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2015 #18
defending the bogus quote jimmy the one Apr 2015 #19
mea culpa; you got me discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2015 #20
George Washington, not so populist jimmy the one Apr 2015 #21
"If it's important enough to put on your timeline, it's important enough to Google." discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2015 #22
When I wrote, "(If you have some....claims Washington meant 'A free people ought not be armed..." discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2015 #23
Register another vote for selecting the most strained of all possible interpretations discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2015 #10
The heller dissent was pretty bad. beevul Apr 2015 #3
The best way to learn any subject is to attempt to teach someone else about it discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2015 #8
For Stevens in particular . . . Surf Fishing Guru Apr 2015 #14
How can anyone take seriously an opinion inferring a limiting definition of a right... discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2015 #15
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Countering the Heller dis...»Reply #1