Concealed carry predictions way off target (No blood in the streets)

[jimmy the one]

26. parry to parry

I wrote: I guess I do agree in a sense with something you said above; you & straw man are indeed, 'nobodies'.

straw man: This in a post where you complain about ad hominem. Oh it's rich, so rich.

You lift my rejoinder out of context, where it was a counterpunch to what donP wrote:

donp: It's a shame no one actually pays any attention to your word salads anymore or believes any of your posts replete with selective "data".
I rejoined: Can't rebut or remark intelligently on anything I wrote so you resort to ad hominem. It's you, baby.
I guess I do agree in a sense with something you said above; you & straw man are indeed, 'nobodies'

So my parry was a parry to donP's earlier parry of what I previously parried, which was what donP first wrote.
An ad hominem to parry an ad hominem towards yourself, is more justifiable than the initiators.