Concealed carry predictions way off target (No blood in the streets)

[Straw Man]

28. Ad nauseum, ad absurdum.

Where did I say you need disprove causation? post it;

OK -- here:

To argue against this simply by continuously citing 'correlation does not prove causation', as if that in itself disproves a causative effect, demonstrates a sophomoric understanding of the axiom itself.

You are defending your position by saying that I haven't disproven a causative effect; that much is abundantly clear. And I am telling you that I don't have to. It is axiomatic, Jimmy, that unless you demonstrate causative effect, correlation alone is meaningless. It doesn't "exonerate" guns from anything. It just means that all your babble about correlation of this and that is absolutely meaningless: the sound and the fury, but nothing of substance.