Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

shadowrider

(4,941 posts)
27. I didn't write this, but wish I had
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 06:43 PM
Feb 2012

I have often heard the antis bleating that “we register cars, why not guns”, and it might surprise people to know that I’m perfectly willing to go the “license and register guns just like cars” route.

Under this plan, gun safety and handling courses will be available to all students 15 and over in the public schools, and kids will be encouraged to take Carriers’ Ed. Also, when they turn 15 they will be eligible for their learner’s carry permit which will allow them to carry concealed as long as they are under the supervision of a licensed adult.

Parents will be especially happy because when their kids take the class, mom and dad will get a break on their homeowner’s insurance premiums. A natural spin-off of this new system: schools and employers will routinely provide convenient, safe gun storage for students and employees just as they do now with parking lots.

Naturally, when someone turns 16 they will go right down to the State Department of Guns and Ammo to get their license to carry. They’ll take the written and practical tests and, whether they took Carriers’ Ed or not, if they pass the tests they’ll get their license on the spot.

Needless to say, about 90% of teens will get their license the first or second time they test. The proud new carriers can then go out and buy their first carry gun. Heck, if Mom and Dad can afford it, some kids will get their first weapon as a 16th birthday present.

Of course this also means that a permit to carry will be valid in every state and mala prohibita restrictions on possession and carrying (ammo restrictions, magazine capacity limits, Evil Black Rifle bans, etc.) must be clearly posted throughout the jurisdiction just as speed limit and stop signs are now.

In the event that you do wind up with a violation it can almost always be dealt with by paying a relatively small fine (either by mail or in person) and will not involve losing the weapon. Likewise a cop can’t just arbitrarily stop you and ask to see your license, absent an underlying visible violation.

The new registration scheme will be a boon to entrepreneurs who will be able to invent, manufacture and sell any sort of gun or accessory they think customers will buy. There will be no local, state or federal agency that can come in and arbitrarily shut a dealer down because when filling out a form a customer put ‘Y’ instead of ‘Yes’. In fact, there won’t be any legal requirement to maintain any sort of form at all.

With the “register them like cars” plan anyone can walk into a gun dealer, plunk down cash and walk out with any gun they want, no questions asked (besides name and address for the registration). Registration fees will be minimal (no more than 1% of the weapon’s value) and will be used to build, maintain and upgrade public shooting ranges that are widely available and free to use.

Of course if you are only going to be using the weapon on private property you don’t need to register them at all and they don’t need to be “street legal”, meaning silencers, machine guns, mortars, bazookas, RPGs, MANPADS etc. are A-OK.

Sure, I’m willing to go that route. Is The Brady Campaign?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So... Basically he is saying: "We can't fight actual crime or actual criminals" Glassunion Feb 2012 #1
I was shocked to read that more than 1/2 of guns used in Chicago crimes were from outstate areas. Lefty48197 Feb 2012 #8
Here is the problem Glassunion Feb 2012 #9
Really? You are implying direct sales. PavePusher Feb 2012 #13
I don't think that has much bearing on the behavior of the thug... SteveW Feb 2012 #20
Since there are exactly zero gun stores in Chicago, I'd guess they all came from out of the city DonP Feb 2012 #22
...but we can impose restrictions on the law-abiding -- and get a fee, too! nt SteveW Feb 2012 #19
LOL he just won't give up will he... virginia mountainman Feb 2012 #2
Well, it's not like it's his own money anyway DonP Feb 2012 #4
idiot Angry Dragon Feb 2012 #3
you took the word right out of my mouth and I don't use that word lightly and I will add Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #14
Sorry to the Obama camp but marsis Feb 2012 #5
This is getting raked over the coals at HuffPo and the Chicago Trib: friendly_iconoclast Feb 2012 #6
He's going for broke. Clames Feb 2012 #7
he he he... krispos42 Feb 2012 #10
That and if you don't pay your government Glassunion Feb 2012 #11
And thus can't own a gun! krispos42 Feb 2012 #16
statewide to cure his cities problem.....hummm.... ileus Feb 2012 #12
To the Greatest PAge jpak Feb 2012 #15
"To the Greatest Page." Simo 1939_1940 Feb 2012 #17
Good to see we agree. TheWraith Feb 2012 #18
To the greatest Pennsylvania-ge? I don't get it. nt SteveW Feb 2012 #21
start at state level then take the dog and pony show nationally... ileus Feb 2012 #23
Whoa. You mean guns will be as closely regulated as cars??? Doctor_J Feb 2012 #24
Wow! That would be great! DonP Feb 2012 #25
+ 1000000000 cleanhippie Feb 2012 #26
Nice Job!! CokeMachine Feb 2012 #31
what a gorgeous rant. Tuesday Afternoon Feb 2012 #33
I didn't write this, but wish I had shadowrider Feb 2012 #27
The horror! Don't you realize that handguns are WAY more important than cars? DanTex Feb 2012 #28
Post removed Post removed Feb 2012 #29
Actually, I was talking to Doctor_J, if that's who you mean. DanTex Feb 2012 #30
GUNS ARE TOOLS! TOOLS I TELL YOU! ellisonz Feb 2012 #32
You were correct right up until you inserted the sarcasm tag. ManiacJoe Feb 2012 #34
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Now Rahm calls for a stat...»Reply #27