Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kudzu22

(1,273 posts)
39. Mahony doesn't understand
Thu Jun 4, 2015, 04:46 PM
Jun 2015

Guns or insurance, apparently. If I hit someone with my car, I owe them money. That's my liability for hitting them. I can insure myself against the possibility of me owing someone money for that.

I do not have any liability for someone stealing my gun and shooting someone. No court is going to force me to pay damages to a grieving family because some third party stole my gun. I have zero liability in a case like that. So what is it that I'm to insure? I'm liable for what *I* do with my gun, but I'm never responsible for the criminal acts of others.

In order for there to be liability insurance, there must first be a liability.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Another silly gun bill has been introduced.. [View all] virginia mountainman May 2015 OP
This message was self-deleted by its author GGJohn May 2015 #1
Might just reduce the amount of guns and the amount of deaths katmondoo May 2015 #2
How? GGJohn May 2015 #3
Facts do not seem to matter Duckhunter935 May 2015 #6
Can you back that up? Duckhunter935 May 2015 #5
Gun deaths are getting ready to surpass auto deaths safeinOhio May 2015 #12
Cars are getting safer Duckhunter935 May 2015 #14
Don't they also count safeinOhio May 2015 #20
Probably not discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2015 #21
I doubt it Duckhunter935 May 2015 #22
Surpass implies that gun deaths rose to pass auto deaths. gejohnston May 2015 #23
Well lets see, we can do something about what you said Duckhunter935 May 2015 #24
Its that high capacity paracord... beevul May 2015 #25
Hmm, that will change the NRA narrative a bit. louis-t May 2015 #26
actually, they are gejohnston May 2015 #28
Facts are so hard for some to take. Duckhunter935 May 2015 #29
Typical gun nut. Spin, spin, spin.... louis-t May 2015 #30
Typical gun controller. Spin, spin, spin.... GGJohn May 2015 #31
Seems to happen a lot Duckhunter935 May 2015 #33
Need to check the manual. beevul May 2015 #35
Now, now Duckhunter935 May 2015 #32
I was born in 1960 gejohnston May 2015 #34
Best cure for "Wild West" fears is to quit watching the nightly news.... Eleanors38 May 2015 #8
Just a small correction discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2015 #27
100 mill was my best guess in the last 20 yrs. Eleanors38 Jun 2015 #37
cool discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2015 #38
So your fine with having insurance.. virginia mountainman May 2015 #9
no, it will reduce the number of legal guns gejohnston May 2015 #17
It would make the NRA a fortune hack89 May 2015 #36
Politicians don't always get it right rock May 2015 #4
Same problem as auto insurance HassleCat May 2015 #7
Huh? rickford66 May 2015 #10
Same vs. justified HassleCat May 2015 #11
Well, it will help the NRA Duckhunter935 May 2015 #13
While I have no issue in principle sarisataka May 2015 #15
Maybe the criminal element will... discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2015 #16
Yep, like how you put that Duckhunter935 May 2015 #19
Wonder what other rights she'd like us to pay for??? ileus May 2015 #18
Mahony doesn't understand kudzu22 Jun 2015 #39
It's not about "insurance", it's just another phony barrier for poor people to climb over DonP Jun 2015 #40
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Another silly gun bill ha...»Reply #39