Gun Control & RKBA

jimmy the one

(2,819 posts)

4. just reporting 'his' facts

Reply to virginia mountainman (Original post)

Thu Jun 25, 2015, 02:49 PM

Jun 2015

va mtn man: Just reporting the facts, without emotional embellishments for all to see.

You're reporting just the facts YOU want to be known, in other words pro gun propagunda.
The judge who ruled on this case is pro gun, ruled pro gun in another case, a republican, Nixon appointee, evidently grew rightwing as the years gone by:

Federal judge allows citizens to challenge post office gun ban.. It seems the Postal Service has precedent on its side, though Judge Richard Matsch wants to hear arguments. A couple in Colorado is challenging post offices' status as "sensitive places," stating that the gun ban on Postal Service property makes it impossible for them to retrieve their mail. The couple lives far from town and does not receive home delivery. Both are concealed-carry permit holders.
The Postal Service attempted to have the suit dismissed, as the Supreme Court has ruled that restricting the right to have firearms is not violated in "sensitive places." Judge Matsch's refusal for dismissal means that both sides of the case will prepare arguments to be heard at a later date. http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/movie-theater-shooting/parents-of-jessica-ghawi-involved-in-brady-center-lawsuit-against-online-ammunition-seller

Ghawi's parents, appeared with attorneys and representatives of the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence to announce the lawsuit against Lucky Gunner and other businesses. Doing business as BulkAmmo. com, that business {lucky gunner} sold the shooting defendant 4,325 rounds for various weapons less than a month before the shooting, according to an ATF special agent's testimony http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/movie-theater-shooting/parents-of-jessica-ghawi-involved-in-brady-center-lawsuit-against-online-ammunition-seller
Ghawi's parents are not seeking monetary damages, but do want to spare other families from similar tragedies by getting a court to order the companies to follow "reasonable business practices." .. lawsuit accuses the four online suppliers of ammunition and military-grade equipment of failing to screen the gunman and making it too easy for him to buy ammunition, tear gas and body armor.

mtn man: ..and they are appealing the case to a higher court too loose some more

Hopefully the appeal won't be heard by a rightwing pro gun judge. Do you really think an appellate court will stick it to the plaintiffs as the rightwing kangaroo court-judge did?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

130 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Brady campaign sued Lucky Gunner, attempting to "put them out of business".. [View all] virginia mountainman Jun 2015 OP

To put an exact number on it, 203k is what the Brady campaign owes Travis_0004 Jun 2015 #1

I wonder if "Magic Mike" Bloomberg is going to cut a check? blueridge3210 Jun 2015 #2

Putting facts into the equation...the legal costs order was against the two parents of a gun slain child. Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #13

You should pay when you bring about a frivolous lawsuit Travis_0004 Jul 2015 #14

^^^^^THIS^^^^^ NaturalHigh Jul 2015 #47

Pray tell Shamash Jul 2015 #20

Boring and pathetically obtuse standard fare....Welcome to Ignore, #45. I grow weary of this common NRA-lover's tripe. Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #21

Ah, the "Ignore List" blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #22

You mean "lost the argument 45 times". Shamash Jul 2015 #28

Heh. blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #29

45 is quite the Ignore List. I think the last person to have a list that long was -- Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #31

I grieve for those parents who lost their child. NaturalHigh Jul 2015 #41

Only "frivolous" because the law has been gerrymandered to favor gun factories. The law is being Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #42

Will not be overturned Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #43

"Wishful thinking" is about all the control fans seem to have left DonP Jul 2015 #44

truly amazing Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #45

I don't think you've thoroughly researched the facts of this case. NaturalHigh Jul 2015 #46

There are 340 million guns in America. Research completed....Conclusion: there are too many guns. Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #48

You would make quite a lawyer. Try taking that argument into court. NaturalHigh Jul 2015 #49

In a court not presided over by a RW gun nut Judge with RW gun nut laws, of course it is the most irrefutable argument Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #53

So TeddyR Jul 2015 #56

So- Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #58

Nonresponsive. (nt) blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #60

There are 340 million guns in America. blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #50

Please be more understanding of Fred's problems Shamash Jul 2015 #51

*** NaturalHigh Jul 2015 #54

Guns are the definition of tort lawsuits. LOL If we lived in a sane society, that is. randys1 Jul 2015 #76

Um, no, you would be wrong. blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #80

"This FACT is WHY the gun mfgs need laws to protect them. " beevul Jul 2015 #90

LOL randys1 Jul 2015 #92

The person on the side of reason, common sense and saving lives blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #93

Sorry again. beevul Jul 2015 #97

Quick questions for randys1 Shamash Jul 2015 #94

Wait, you get to call me a nut but I cant call you one LOL randys1 Jul 2015 #95

Non-responsive. (nt) blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #96

So you DO Get to call me a nut, guess what would happen if I called you a gun nut randys1 Jul 2015 #98

What would happen if someone on DU called me a gun nut? Around here, I'd call it Tuesday. Shamash Jul 2015 #99

My position is simple, really. Apart from the simple fact that the 2nd only allows for guns randys1 Jul 2015 #101

You must have missed a couple of USSC decisions blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #104

I can read...I know what the 2nd says randys1 Jul 2015 #105

"Your future is one where everybody and their uncle, aunt and child has a gun " blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #106

That's nice Shamash Jul 2015 #107

You are very angry, so my interaction with you will end after this post. randys1 Jul 2015 #108

*Sigh* blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #109

Media Matters? Where Brock had his minions violate DC gun control laws so he could be protected? Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #114

Media Matters attacked at DU....LOL wow...amazing randys1 Jul 2015 #115

Truth is not an attack. Brock violated DC gun control laws to acquire and possess a gun. Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #116

You are completely clueless Shamash Jul 2015 #117

Where did I call you a nut? blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #102

it was shamash randys1 Jul 2015 #103

Still waiting for an answer to the questions. Or is deflection and poutrage all you have today? Shamash Jul 2015 #100

Hey, PLCAA detractors... beevul Jun 2015 #3

just reporting 'his' facts jimmy the one Jun 2015 #4

I would expect the appellate judge blueridge3210 Jun 2015 #5

The law, as written by the NRA and gun death supporters, is a special Colorado carve out for only gun manufacturers...corruption pays. Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #9

So you are claiming that if I am hit by a stolen car, driven by a person running from the police oneshooter Jul 2015 #10

Yes, that is exactly what I mean, of course it is. Silly analogy. How about that special NRA gun manufacturer protection law? Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #11

You mean the law to prevent firearms manufacturers from being sued for the illegal use oneshooter Jul 2015 #15

Cars manufactured to kill people? Which company is doing that, I wanna see that LOL randys1 Jul 2015 #78

Having a gun designed to kill could be useful if confronted by a Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #89

For a device that was not developed to "kill people" oneshooter Jul 2015 #110

Are you aware sarisataka Jul 2015 #12

When you attempt to ... MicaelS Jul 2015 #16

Um, no. You would be wrong. blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #17

Poor, poor babies, the gun manufacturers, being "harrassed", poor helpless babies needing special protection. Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #18

And suing businesses from manufacturers... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2015 #19

The gun manufacturers were being targeted by lawsuits blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #23

Welcome to Full Ignore #46.....gun lovers love gun manufacturers who need special legal protection from Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #24

The law was passed in response to blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #25

Watch it Mister! beevul Jul 2015 #32

Oh, noes! blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #33

I am on a couple of those lists Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #34

Yup. Clearly, it keeps you up at night........ blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #35

Started out HAWK Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #36

My middle son is a Army medic. oneshooter Jul 2015 #38

Cool Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #39

After he talked to me he called it"Sick, Lame and lazy call" oneshooter Jul 2015 #40

yeah, it is exciting when people get blown up and wounded... Human101948 Jul 2015 #84

Yes it can get that way, have you ever been in the weeds? oneshooter Jul 2015 #111

Have not slept in months, lol Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #37

"WMDs" Lizzie Poppet Jul 2015 #30

Not sure they were being "harrassed" TeddyR Jul 2015 #27

No shit. And yet what you are saying seems incomprehensible to some. randys1 Jul 2015 #79

The law in Colorado TeddyR Jul 2015 #26

You know Jimmy.. virginia mountainman Jun 2015 #6

This message was self-deleted by its author friendly_iconoclast Jun 2015 #7

"You really should help the Brady campaign lawyers." Perhaps he is already doing so friendly_iconoclast Jun 2015 #8

The fact that the judiciary in gerrymandered Red states has become infested with RW extremists, Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #52

Um, no. blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #55

UPDATE... They give up..... Time to write the check $$$$$$ ! virginia mountainman Jul 2015 #130

Common sense deathrind Jul 2015 #57

The First Amendment says nothing about printer's ink. blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #59

Ink =/= Ammo.... deathrind Jul 2015 #69

Ink = Ammo blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #72

You do realize.. virginia mountainman Jul 2015 #61

See my reply above. N/T deathrind Jul 2015 #68

I could send a first year law student to defend the right of ammo in front of the supreme court Travis_0004 Jul 2015 #63

Nice jump to conclusion. deathrind Jul 2015 #67

Aren't you the one who just said Shamash Jul 2015 #70

Free ammo Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #71

I'm sorta late to this thread and I really have not much to add except tularetom Jul 2015 #62

Stay tuned, the outcome is yet to come. Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #64

Sorry Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #65

"It amazes me how one side, can so turn it around, and use the other side's own money against them." pablo_marmol Jul 2015 #66

Why do some folks cheer on arms merchants when... stone space Jul 2015 #73

It's not hte for the victims but you know that. Any delight in loss is reserved strictly for the Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #74

This is about hatred for gun victims, plain and simple. stone space Jul 2015 #75

Um, no, it's not about "hatred". blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #77

I don't hate anybody in the world... tularetom Jul 2015 #81

You can't blame anybody but the arms industry for their... stone space Jul 2015 #82

Are you reading things in reverse? beevul Jul 2015 #85

Who's to blame for DUIs, sexual assault and domestic violence? Alcohol distillers or the criminals? Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #87

But, but, but............... blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #88

Nobody "attacked" the family of a victim tularetom Jul 2015 #91

He's back on time out. blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #112

You know, I sort of knew I was wasting my time when I responded to that first post tularetom Jul 2015 #113

I guess if you plan to time out yourself... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2015 #118

Wow, he didn't even last one day back? DonP Jul 2015 #119

Nope. blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #120

LMAO, looks like the religion and spirituality group is tired of him too Lurks Often Jul 2015 #121

Nope, GGJohn Jul 2015 #122

Wow 6, very impressive Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #123

Thanks. GGJohn Jul 2015 #124

I am sure Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #126

Wow, 2 hides within 10 minutes Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #125

Seeing as you have demonstrated the lack of a functional definition for murder you Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #86

Not surprised that you **hatefully** twist my disdain for The Brady Bunch pablo_marmol Jul 2015 #83

not just gun hate Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #127

You are correct. pablo_marmol Jul 2015 #128

Yes Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #129