Gun Control & RKBA

blueridge3210

(1,401 posts)

59. The First Amendment says nothing about printer's ink.

Sun Jul 5, 2015, 08:39 PM

Jul 2015

Yet court cases have established clear precedent regarding attempts to engage a back-door prohibition by excessive regulations and/or taxes that result in inhibiting exercise of a constitutional right. The same would apply to any attempt to prohibit or excessively tax ammunition.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

130 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Brady campaign sued Lucky Gunner, attempting to "put them out of business".. [View all] virginia mountainman Jun 2015 OP

To put an exact number on it, 203k is what the Brady campaign owes Travis_0004 Jun 2015 #1

I wonder if "Magic Mike" Bloomberg is going to cut a check? blueridge3210 Jun 2015 #2

Putting facts into the equation...the legal costs order was against the two parents of a gun slain child. Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #13

You should pay when you bring about a frivolous lawsuit Travis_0004 Jul 2015 #14

^^^^^THIS^^^^^ NaturalHigh Jul 2015 #47

Pray tell Shamash Jul 2015 #20

Boring and pathetically obtuse standard fare....Welcome to Ignore, #45. I grow weary of this common NRA-lover's tripe. Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #21

Ah, the "Ignore List" blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #22

You mean "lost the argument 45 times". Shamash Jul 2015 #28

Heh. blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #29

45 is quite the Ignore List. I think the last person to have a list that long was -- Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #31

I grieve for those parents who lost their child. NaturalHigh Jul 2015 #41

Only "frivolous" because the law has been gerrymandered to favor gun factories. The law is being Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #42

Will not be overturned Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #43

"Wishful thinking" is about all the control fans seem to have left DonP Jul 2015 #44

truly amazing Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #45

I don't think you've thoroughly researched the facts of this case. NaturalHigh Jul 2015 #46

There are 340 million guns in America. Research completed....Conclusion: there are too many guns. Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #48

You would make quite a lawyer. Try taking that argument into court. NaturalHigh Jul 2015 #49

In a court not presided over by a RW gun nut Judge with RW gun nut laws, of course it is the most irrefutable argument Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #53

So TeddyR Jul 2015 #56

So- Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #58

Nonresponsive. (nt) blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #60

There are 340 million guns in America. blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #50

Please be more understanding of Fred's problems Shamash Jul 2015 #51

*** NaturalHigh Jul 2015 #54

Guns are the definition of tort lawsuits. LOL If we lived in a sane society, that is. randys1 Jul 2015 #76

Um, no, you would be wrong. blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #80

"This FACT is WHY the gun mfgs need laws to protect them. " beevul Jul 2015 #90

LOL randys1 Jul 2015 #92

The person on the side of reason, common sense and saving lives blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #93

Sorry again. beevul Jul 2015 #97

Quick questions for randys1 Shamash Jul 2015 #94

Wait, you get to call me a nut but I cant call you one LOL randys1 Jul 2015 #95

Non-responsive. (nt) blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #96

So you DO Get to call me a nut, guess what would happen if I called you a gun nut randys1 Jul 2015 #98

What would happen if someone on DU called me a gun nut? Around here, I'd call it Tuesday. Shamash Jul 2015 #99

My position is simple, really. Apart from the simple fact that the 2nd only allows for guns randys1 Jul 2015 #101

You must have missed a couple of USSC decisions blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #104

I can read...I know what the 2nd says randys1 Jul 2015 #105

"Your future is one where everybody and their uncle, aunt and child has a gun " blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #106

That's nice Shamash Jul 2015 #107

You are very angry, so my interaction with you will end after this post. randys1 Jul 2015 #108

*Sigh* blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #109

Media Matters? Where Brock had his minions violate DC gun control laws so he could be protected? Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #114

Media Matters attacked at DU....LOL wow...amazing randys1 Jul 2015 #115

Truth is not an attack. Brock violated DC gun control laws to acquire and possess a gun. Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #116

You are completely clueless Shamash Jul 2015 #117

Where did I call you a nut? blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #102

it was shamash randys1 Jul 2015 #103

Still waiting for an answer to the questions. Or is deflection and poutrage all you have today? Shamash Jul 2015 #100

Hey, PLCAA detractors... beevul Jun 2015 #3

just reporting 'his' facts jimmy the one Jun 2015 #4

I would expect the appellate judge blueridge3210 Jun 2015 #5

The law, as written by the NRA and gun death supporters, is a special Colorado carve out for only gun manufacturers...corruption pays. Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #9

So you are claiming that if I am hit by a stolen car, driven by a person running from the police oneshooter Jul 2015 #10

Yes, that is exactly what I mean, of course it is. Silly analogy. How about that special NRA gun manufacturer protection law? Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #11

You mean the law to prevent firearms manufacturers from being sued for the illegal use oneshooter Jul 2015 #15

Cars manufactured to kill people? Which company is doing that, I wanna see that LOL randys1 Jul 2015 #78

Having a gun designed to kill could be useful if confronted by a Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #89

For a device that was not developed to "kill people" oneshooter Jul 2015 #110

Are you aware sarisataka Jul 2015 #12

When you attempt to ... MicaelS Jul 2015 #16

Um, no. You would be wrong. blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #17

Poor, poor babies, the gun manufacturers, being "harrassed", poor helpless babies needing special protection. Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #18

And suing businesses from manufacturers... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2015 #19

The gun manufacturers were being targeted by lawsuits blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #23

Welcome to Full Ignore #46.....gun lovers love gun manufacturers who need special legal protection from Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #24

The law was passed in response to blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #25

Watch it Mister! beevul Jul 2015 #32

Oh, noes! blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #33

I am on a couple of those lists Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #34

Yup. Clearly, it keeps you up at night........ blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #35

Started out HAWK Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #36

My middle son is a Army medic. oneshooter Jul 2015 #38

Cool Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #39

After he talked to me he called it"Sick, Lame and lazy call" oneshooter Jul 2015 #40

yeah, it is exciting when people get blown up and wounded... Human101948 Jul 2015 #84

Yes it can get that way, have you ever been in the weeds? oneshooter Jul 2015 #111

Have not slept in months, lol Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #37

"WMDs" Lizzie Poppet Jul 2015 #30

Not sure they were being "harrassed" TeddyR Jul 2015 #27

No shit. And yet what you are saying seems incomprehensible to some. randys1 Jul 2015 #79

The law in Colorado TeddyR Jul 2015 #26

You know Jimmy.. virginia mountainman Jun 2015 #6

This message was self-deleted by its author friendly_iconoclast Jun 2015 #7

"You really should help the Brady campaign lawyers." Perhaps he is already doing so friendly_iconoclast Jun 2015 #8

The fact that the judiciary in gerrymandered Red states has become infested with RW extremists, Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #52

Um, no. blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #55

UPDATE... They give up..... Time to write the check $$$$$$ ! virginia mountainman Jul 2015 #130

Common sense deathrind Jul 2015 #57

The First Amendment says nothing about printer's ink. blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #59

Ink =/= Ammo.... deathrind Jul 2015 #69

Ink = Ammo blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #72

You do realize.. virginia mountainman Jul 2015 #61

See my reply above. N/T deathrind Jul 2015 #68

I could send a first year law student to defend the right of ammo in front of the supreme court Travis_0004 Jul 2015 #63

Nice jump to conclusion. deathrind Jul 2015 #67

Aren't you the one who just said Shamash Jul 2015 #70

Free ammo Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #71

I'm sorta late to this thread and I really have not much to add except tularetom Jul 2015 #62

Stay tuned, the outcome is yet to come. Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #64

Sorry Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #65

"It amazes me how one side, can so turn it around, and use the other side's own money against them." pablo_marmol Jul 2015 #66

Why do some folks cheer on arms merchants when... stone space Jul 2015 #73

It's not hte for the victims but you know that. Any delight in loss is reserved strictly for the Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #74

This is about hatred for gun victims, plain and simple. stone space Jul 2015 #75

Um, no, it's not about "hatred". blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #77

I don't hate anybody in the world... tularetom Jul 2015 #81

You can't blame anybody but the arms industry for their... stone space Jul 2015 #82

Are you reading things in reverse? beevul Jul 2015 #85

Who's to blame for DUIs, sexual assault and domestic violence? Alcohol distillers or the criminals? Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #87

But, but, but............... blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #88

Nobody "attacked" the family of a victim tularetom Jul 2015 #91

He's back on time out. blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #112

You know, I sort of knew I was wasting my time when I responded to that first post tularetom Jul 2015 #113

I guess if you plan to time out yourself... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2015 #118

Wow, he didn't even last one day back? DonP Jul 2015 #119

Nope. blueridge3210 Jul 2015 #120

LMAO, looks like the religion and spirituality group is tired of him too Lurks Often Jul 2015 #121

Nope, GGJohn Jul 2015 #122

Wow 6, very impressive Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #123

Thanks. GGJohn Jul 2015 #124

I am sure Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #126

Wow, 2 hides within 10 minutes Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #125

Seeing as you have demonstrated the lack of a functional definition for murder you Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2015 #86

Not surprised that you **hatefully** twist my disdain for The Brady Bunch pablo_marmol Jul 2015 #83

not just gun hate Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #127

You are correct. pablo_marmol Jul 2015 #128

Yes Duckhunter935 Jul 2015 #129