Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

friendly_iconoclast

(15,333 posts)
18. Well, I think you're trying (and failing) to gin up a moral panic
Mon Dec 19, 2011, 11:30 PM
Dec 2011

I think the second paragraph of the first citation explains things best:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_panic

Moral panic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A moral panic is the intensity of feeling expressed in a population about an issue that appears to threaten the social order.[1] According to Stanley Cohen, author of Folk Devils and Moral Panics (1972) and credited as creator of the term, a moral panic occurs when "[a] condition, episode, person or group of persons emerges to become defined as a threat to societal values and interests."[2] Those who start the panic when they fear a threat to prevailing social or cultural values are known by researchers as "moral entrepreneurs," while people who supposedly threaten the social order have been described as "folk devils."...

...Various researchers have shown that fears of increasing crime or an increase in certain types of crime are often the cause of moral panics (Cohen, 1972; Hall et al. 1978; Goode and Ben-Yehuda 1994). Recent studies have shown that despite declining crime rates, this phenomenon continues to occur in various cultures. Japanese jurist Koichi Hamai (浜井浩&#19968 points out how the changes in crime recording in Japan since the 1990s led to the widespread view that the crime rate is rising and that crimes are increasingly severe. This became an election issue in 2003 with a moral panic over the "collapsing safe society."[16] Some critics have pointed to moral panic as an explanation for the War on Drugs. For example a Royal Society of Arts commission concluded that "the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971, ... is driven more by 'moral panic' than by a practical desire to reduce harm."[17]...


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_entrepreneur


Moral entrepreneur
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A moral entrepreneur is a person who seeks to influence a group to adopt or maintain a norm. The moral entrepreneur may press for the creation or enforcement of a norm for any number of reasons, altruistic or selfish. Some examples of moral entrepreneurs are: MADD (mothers against drunk driving), the anti-tobacco lobby, and the pro-life movement.

The term "moral entrepreneur" was coined by Howard S. Becker. In his view, moral entrepreneurs fall into roughly two categories: rule creators, and rule enforcers. Rule creators can be seen as moral crusaders, who are concerned chiefly with the successful persuasion of others, but are not concerned with the means by which this persuasion is achieved. Successful moral crusades are generally dominated by those in the upper social strata of society (Becker,1963). There is political competition in which these moral crusaders originate crusades aimed at generating reform, based on what they think is moral, therefore defining deviance. Moral crusaders must have power, public support, generate public awareness of the issue, and be able to propose a clear and acceptable solution to the problem (Becker, 1963).

After a time, crusaders become dependent upon experts or professionals, who serve to legitimize a moral creed on technical or scientific grounds. Rule enforcers, such as policemen, are compelled by two drives: the need to justify their own role, and the need to win respect in interactions. They are in a bind; if they show too much effectiveness one might say they are not needed, and if they show too little effectiveness one might say they are failing. Rule enforcers just feel the need to enforce the rule because that is their job; they are not really concerned with the content of the rule. As rules are changed, something that was once acceptable may now be punished and vice versa. Such officials tend to take a pessimistic view of human nature because of constant exposure to willful deviance.

References: Becker, Howard S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: The Free Press. pp. 147–153.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

So, what is your commentary/proposals? n/t PavePusher Dec 2011 #1
You can go check back on the other thread... ellisonz Dec 2011 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author ellisonz Dec 2011 #3
This is a very tacky post, ellisonz, I encourage you to remove it petronius Dec 2011 #4
Well I respect you...but... ellisonz Dec 2011 #7
I wasn't referring to the OP, I was referring to the "crickets" post petronius Dec 2011 #11
Done. ellisonz Dec 2011 #12
Thank you! (nt) petronius Dec 2011 #15
How about more and better criminal control? one-eyed fat man Dec 2011 #16
You couldn't be more wrong. ellisonz Dec 2011 #17
You don't get it one-eyed fat man Dec 2011 #19
Hey...don't look at me...I'm not the one encouraging doing away with a failed system. ellisonz Dec 2011 #20
What you've overlooked in your moral entrepeneurship is the system hasn't failed. friendly_iconoclast Dec 2011 #21
Because of gun control... ellisonz Dec 2011 #22
But gun laws are far less restrictive than they were forty years ago- and there are far more guns... friendly_iconoclast Dec 2011 #25
So you're for gun control... ellisonz Dec 2011 #29
You are purposely being obtuse. PavePusher Dec 2011 #31
I've refuted the basis of most of your studies which are narrowly constructed... ellisonz Dec 2011 #41
Learned nothing from the Eighteenth Amendment? one-eyed fat man Dec 2011 #34
Post removed Post removed Dec 2011 #43
more than you gejohnston Dec 2011 #44
Ok. ellisonz Dec 2011 #45
Utah's murder rate gejohnston Dec 2011 #46
Have another. ellisonz Dec 2011 #47
No, don't drink, don't smoke, don't do drugs. one-eyed fat man Dec 2011 #52
Oh please... ellisonz Dec 2011 #53
Where do you see anger in that post? N/T beevul Dec 2011 #57
Here, try this out one-eyed fat man Dec 2011 #26
That's a ludicrous example... ellisonz Dec 2011 #27
Hardly- the NICS is run by the FBI, who also run the national crime databases. friendly_iconoclast Dec 2011 #30
Have you been in this forum when "universal" b.g. checks was debated? SteveW Dec 2011 #40
"more better laws" don't seem to have worked. Your proposals? SteveW Dec 2011 #39
How so? Atypical Liberal Dec 2011 #35
you referred to 'the defense of unlimited gun rights go unchallenged on this board' aikoaiko Dec 2011 #37
Many errors and false assumptions on your part... SteveW Dec 2011 #38
Do you read your own posts? beevul Dec 2011 #50
How about tired? ellisonz Dec 2011 #51
You aren't the only one. beevul Dec 2011 #54
So we should have no debate and all agree on a highly painful issue? ellisonz Dec 2011 #55
I don't recall anyone saying that. beevul Dec 2011 #56
Interestingly enough, those crickets include you, ellisonz ManiacJoe Dec 2011 #6
If I didn't care I wouldn't have posted, no? ellisonz Dec 2011 #8
And your point? rl6214 Dec 2011 #5
What's your point? ellisonz Dec 2011 #9
You are just the latest in a long line of gun control zealots that posts rl6214 Dec 2011 #10
Ha... ellisonz Dec 2011 #14
Well, I think you're trying (and failing) to gin up a moral panic friendly_iconoclast Dec 2011 #18
I've actually read that Becker work. ellisonz Dec 2011 #23
No, but all these accounts of satanic ritual abu..., err gun crimes friendly_iconoclast Dec 2011 #24
If only... ellisonz Dec 2011 #28
Gun laws are now laxer, there are fewer police on the streets and .. hack89 Dec 2011 #32
What color is the sky in your world? We_Have_A_Problem Dec 2011 #33
You really need to do some research. Atypical Liberal Dec 2011 #36
What personal attack? rl6214 Dec 2011 #48
The jury disagreed with you - your bit about "dancing" is a personal attack. ellisonz Dec 2011 #49
LEO's please don't ever let your guard down. ileus Dec 2011 #13
Shooting Leaves Local Police Searching For Answers ellisonz Dec 2011 #42
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Fatal Cop Shooting Suspec...»Reply #18