Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Lawmakers say Ohio shooting won't change nation's gun rights [View all]ellisonz
(27,776 posts)34. "It's called freedom of thought. I know, by your own words here, that this chaffs you mightily."
No, this chaffs me mightily:
Domestic Violence
Guns increase the probability of death in incidents of domestic violence.26
Firearms were used to kill more than two-thirds of spouse and ex-spouse homicide victims between 1990 and 2005.27
Domestic violence assaults involving a firearm are 23 times more likely to result in death than those involving other weapons or bodily force.28
Abused women are five times more likely to be killed by their abuser if the abuser owns a firearm.29
A recent survey of female domestic violence shelter residents in California found that more than one third (36.7%) reported having been threatened or harmed with a firearm.30 In nearly two thirds (64.5%) of the households that contained a firearm, the intimate partner had used the firearm against the victim, usually threatening to shoot or kill the victim.31
Laws that prohibit the purchase of a firearm by a person subject to a domestic violence restraining order are associated with a reduction in the number of intimate partner homicides.32
Between 1990 and 2005, individuals killed by current dating partners made up almost half of all spouse and current dating partner homicides.33
A study of applicants for domestic violence restraining orders in Los Angeles found that the most common relationship between the victim and abuser was a dating relationship, and applications for protective orders were more likely to mention firearms when the parties had not lived together and were not married.34
For additional information about domestic violence and firearms, including background information and state and local laws on the topic, see LCAVs Domestic Violence and Firearms Policy Summary.
http://www.lcav.org/statistics-polling/gun_violence_statistics.asp
Guns increase the probability of death in incidents of domestic violence.26
Firearms were used to kill more than two-thirds of spouse and ex-spouse homicide victims between 1990 and 2005.27
Domestic violence assaults involving a firearm are 23 times more likely to result in death than those involving other weapons or bodily force.28
Abused women are five times more likely to be killed by their abuser if the abuser owns a firearm.29
A recent survey of female domestic violence shelter residents in California found that more than one third (36.7%) reported having been threatened or harmed with a firearm.30 In nearly two thirds (64.5%) of the households that contained a firearm, the intimate partner had used the firearm against the victim, usually threatening to shoot or kill the victim.31
Laws that prohibit the purchase of a firearm by a person subject to a domestic violence restraining order are associated with a reduction in the number of intimate partner homicides.32
Between 1990 and 2005, individuals killed by current dating partners made up almost half of all spouse and current dating partner homicides.33
A study of applicants for domestic violence restraining orders in Los Angeles found that the most common relationship between the victim and abuser was a dating relationship, and applications for protective orders were more likely to mention firearms when the parties had not lived together and were not married.34
For additional information about domestic violence and firearms, including background information and state and local laws on the topic, see LCAVs Domestic Violence and Firearms Policy Summary.
http://www.lcav.org/statistics-polling/gun_violence_statistics.asp
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
83 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I"ll listen to ya. Tell us what"extreme control over hand guns and ammunition"
oneshooter
Mar 2012
#17
Has nothing to do with cherry picking GOP views as there are obviously LOTS of Dems
rl6214
Mar 2012
#9
The healthcare vote passed with no margin in the Senate and 3 votes in the House...
ellisonz
Mar 2012
#11
SOP: dodge question, bring up another one. BTW, what is the offensive remark? nt
SteveW
Mar 2012
#76
What do you mean by "political opinion is not grocery shopping" - are you saying
petronius
Mar 2012
#16
But you never denied it, even when asked directly, and you still haven't yet.
oneshooter
Mar 2012
#72
Still no denial, so you really don't like democracy. Three chances, three strikes, YER OUT!
oneshooter
Mar 2012
#79
"I don't get how some people can cherry-pick GOP views that they agree with."
PavePusher
Mar 2012
#28
"It's called freedom of thought. I know, by your own words here, that this chaffs you mightily."
ellisonz
Mar 2012
#34
The problem is, you want to take it up with the people that aren't doing any of that...
beevul
Mar 2012
#36
Do "batshit crazy" Republicans include the Brady Center? "Cherry-picked," are they? nt
SteveW
Mar 2012
#75
So, let's see if I understand you. Your side can project your feelings of inadequacy and phobia onto
Common Sense Party
Mar 2012
#29
They *are* failing... to reduce the number of guns. Guns themselves are the problem for some.
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2012
#65
DO they ask lawmakers after every drunk driver-caused fatality if it will prompt a legislative
Common Sense Party
Mar 2012
#23