Poll: The "Under The Gun" director owned and defended her pious fraud in an interview... [View all]

[friendly_iconoclast]

https://variety.com/2016/film/news/under-the-gun-director-i-stand-by-edit-1201787149/

Is that sort of edit in line with standard practices for documentary filmmaking?

I think it has a different standard than the nightly news has. When you’re making a film like this, the goal is to get people to come to theaters to watch your film. You have to provide a thematic experience for them. I don’t think we misconstrued any of the facts. I think the VCDL made their position on background checks very clear earlier in the film and throughout the film. So yeah, I do think it’s pro forma for filmmaking.

Couric said in her statement that she spoke with you about the edit and raised concerns. Did she?

We talked about everything in the film and all edit choices. I’m the director of the film and at the end of the day I felt it was necessary to stop down and give people a moment to consider the question.

She mentioned you by name in her statement. Did you feel at all like she was attempting to shift blame for the controversy to you?

Not at all. Any time Katie does an interview and receives a compliment on the film she says, “It’s all Stephanie. I can take very little credit for this. Stephanie and her team did all of this.” That swings both ways, right? In other decisions that I made I need to take responsibility, too, and this was my choice.

In what way, if any, does she differ from James O'Keefe?

9 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
	Same tactics, used for a different cause
	8 (89%)
	Not at all the same (please explain below)
	0 (0%)
	Other
	1 (11%)
	I prefer not to answer
	0 (0%)
	0 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll