Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

DonP

(6,185 posts)
34. "Fuddism" = Hypocrisy in action
Thu Sep 22, 2016, 05:30 PM
Sep 2016

"You guys can't be trusted with the guns you use, but mine are perfectly safe, because, ... well, they're mine"

That is until the Grabnutz decide that scope on your .308 make them look too much like a "military style" sniper rifle, so we better get those out of civilian hands. And ... while they're at it, that 870 shotgun looks too much like a "military style" police riot gun, so we better take that as well, for the greater good. Those C&R WWII service rifles, Nagant, Mauser, Garand, Springfield '03, et. al. are all REAL military weapons, so they obviously have no place in civilian hands.

Well regulated and all that.

Funny how some folks are very careful to write one way to sound "reasonable" in one group but piss, moan, rant and puke all over gun owners in other groups?

it all depends melm00se Sep 2016 #1
"Which view and interpretation one takes can be a clear indicator of one's bias and ideology." pablo_marmol Sep 2016 #7
My take is even in the most erudite of Salons one can suffer a chicken coop's explosive diarrhea. Eleanors38 Sep 2016 #9
Fine examples of doublethink. sarisataka Sep 2016 #2
You forgot one. oneshooter Sep 2016 #4
Yep, more proof safeinOhio Sep 2016 #3
It's a good thing that "need" has nothing to do with it, huh? DonP Sep 2016 #5
Unless you are in cities like Baltimore or Chicago. jmg257 Sep 2016 #6
No wonder we're not trusted by so many citizens. pablo_marmol Sep 2016 #8
GOD! this is a day for bad-ass irony. I feel a beer comin' on. Eleanors38 Sep 2016 #10
Does a decrease in DUIs proves we no longer need drunk driving laws and PSAs? Nuclear Unicorn Sep 2016 #11
Then don't own one. You have the right to choose, as do I. (n/t) benEzra Sep 2016 #12
I own a few safeinOhio Sep 2016 #13
You are perfectly free to choose for yourself. You are not free to choose for others friendly_iconoclast Sep 2016 #14
I didn't say any thing about choosing for others. safeinOhio Sep 2016 #18
In a possibly apocryphal quote attributed to Calvin Coolidge ... Straw Man Sep 2016 #15
Choice is a good thing Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #16
Show me were I said any such thing. safeinOhio Sep 2016 #17
This legal gun owner has a huge problem with registration hack89 Sep 2016 #19
Post #3 Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #20
Try reading it again. safeinOhio Sep 2016 #21
I know what you meant Duckhunter935 Sep 2016 #22
Might want to get that wax out of your ears. safeinOhio Sep 2016 #25
You don't need firearms for hunting either, archery tackle can fill that role. As for sport... Marengo Sep 2016 #23
I bow hunt and safeinOhio Sep 2016 #26
The poster asked if you unequivocally renounce using your guns for self-defense friendly_iconoclast Sep 2016 #28
That is a loaded question. safeinOhio Sep 2016 #29
Answering "no" would not necessarily imply that at any time you did beat your wife. discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2016 #30
I suspect the reason why a definite answer hasn't been given is that it would not be "yes" friendly_iconoclast Sep 2016 #33
"Fuddism" = Hypocrisy in action DonP Sep 2016 #34
What would they say about an 1894 Winchester in .25-35? discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2016 #35
Show a video of Chuck Connors using it ... DonP Sep 2016 #36
Why not? Congress was shown a few minutes of the movie Wargames. discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2016 #37
Post removed Post removed Sep 2016 #38
The only thing worse than not knowing why the world... discntnt_irny_srcsm Sep 2016 #39
It is an awkward question, not a loaded one. A reluctance to answer it speaks volumes... friendly_iconoclast Sep 2016 #31
Yes it does safeinOhio Sep 2016 #32
I assume then that you retain possession of firearms out of want rather than need? Marengo Sep 2016 #40
It's not a question of pacifism vs. fear, benEzra Sep 2016 #24
I don't think I mentioned pacifism or inferred it. safeinOhio Sep 2016 #27
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Looks like we can tell th...»Reply #34