Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
As predictable as ants in a dove field.... Eleanors38 Oct 2016 #1
I have never heard that saying before underpants Oct 2016 #26
First time I've heard it too. NaturalHigh Oct 2016 #52
Be sure where you place your killed doves -- the ants find them, fast. Eleanors38 Oct 2016 #113
Yea that protection needs to go Ohioblue22 Oct 2016 #2
Why is that? n/t discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2016 #3
Trumped up lawsuits? JonathanRackham Oct 2016 #4
The person to whom I responded... discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2016 #5
Why? Because it gives this ONE industry in our country immunity against law suits and BlueCaliDem Oct 2016 #27
The law allows you to sue gun manufacturers hack89 Oct 2016 #35
Not quite. branford Oct 2016 #36
Glad to see you posting again Duckhunter935 Oct 2016 #40
Thanks. branford Oct 2016 #44
Bullshit. What's not fair is that arms manufacturers are allowed to kill our kids with impunity stone space Oct 2016 #97
How many drunk driving victims have auto manufacturers killed? friendly_iconoclast Oct 2016 #107
Post removed Post removed Nov 2016 #148
But... discntnt_irny_srcsm Nov 2016 #149
re: "Bullshit" discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2016 #109
I would like to learn more about the "Arms manufacturings killing kids and crying like a victim." Littlepawkitty Oct 2016 #116
It's easy if you accept the NRA as the mouthpiece for them... fleabiscuit Oct 2016 #117
So... Littlepawkitty Oct 2016 #118
So... fleabiscuit Oct 2016 #119
they are not fighting the technology, gejohnston Oct 2016 #120
Non Sequitur. fleabiscuit Oct 2016 #121
A bit Littlepawkitty Oct 2016 #123
the technology doesn't exist gejohnston Oct 2016 #126
Microstamping is already being used. fleabiscuit Oct 2016 #127
Where Littlepawkitty Oct 2016 #128
not on ammuntion, gejohnston Oct 2016 #129
Used for what? beevul Oct 2016 #136
I suggest you read up a bit discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2016 #139
And this is why we get nowwhere Travis_0004 Oct 2016 #132
"able to be overridden by legal authority" Nuclear Unicorn Oct 2016 #145
Once more... Littlepawkitty Oct 2016 #122
Again... fleabiscuit Oct 2016 #124
The guns weren't defective Littlepawkitty Oct 2016 #125
Less than 100 kids under 15yoa are killed by gun accidents each year... Eleanors38 Oct 2016 #141
Results discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2016 #142
Even the virulently anti-gun WaPo owns up to a figure of 84 accidental deaths in 2015... Eleanors38 Oct 2016 #143
CDCs WISQARS goes to 2014 discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2016 #144
The "doubt" about CDC research serves more as a tip-off to the gross slant an article takes... Eleanors38 Oct 2016 #147
There are 6 exceptions Duckhunter935 Oct 2016 #39
(A) Please point to a suit or instance where... discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2016 #45
I'm not on trial here, pal. You don't get to do deposition here with me. Awful, huh? BlueCaliDem Oct 2016 #48
thanks for the non sequitur discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2016 #49
Post removed Post removed Oct 2016 #50
"The PLCAA is on trial" ? branford Oct 2016 #51
Did someone say you were? beevul Oct 2016 #54
Do you even know what the PLCAA says? Littlepawkitty Oct 2016 #137
federal laws don't necessarily supersede state laws, gejohnston Oct 2016 #60
Yes, it does - according to Article VI of the U.S. Constitution. Always. BlueCaliDem Oct 2016 #62
it was without merit because gejohnston Oct 2016 #63
Unless you've seen all the evidence that Plaintiff planned to introduce, neither you nor I can say BlueCaliDem Oct 2016 #75
I know the evidence, gejohnston Oct 2016 #78
Thanks for your opinion. I wasn't asking for it, but thanks anyhow. BlueCaliDem Oct 2016 #80
What evidence? branford Oct 2016 #85
I'll take "what this guy said" Littlepawkitty Oct 2016 #140
False. Remington or any other gun seller is subject to product liability actions. Eleanors38 Oct 2016 #114
Why? Nancyswidower Oct 2016 #6
Because until they can get sued the won't do a thing about making them safer Ohioblue22 Oct 2016 #9
no it isn't gejohnston Oct 2016 #12
Maybe your correct there's just no way to make them Ohioblue22 Oct 2016 #24
They fight like hell about mandates for technology Duckhunter935 Oct 2016 #28
I'm all for choice but but kids don't get to have heroin Ohioblue22 Oct 2016 #31
You can own a tank Duckhunter935 Oct 2016 #33
Yes, you can indeed own a tank. beevul Oct 2016 #55
The technology does work. deathrind Oct 2016 #81
Gun rights proponents see the technology as a threat branford Oct 2016 #89
no. gejohnston Oct 2016 #29
Please spare me the false equivalence examples Ohioblue22 Oct 2016 #32
I do not think lawn darts Duckhunter935 Oct 2016 #34
Lawn Darts aren't mentioned in Holy Scripture, huh? stone space Oct 2016 #61
Post removed Post removed Oct 2016 #86
Why are you posting Libertarian propoganda here on DU? stone space Oct 2016 #91
Post removed Post removed Oct 2016 #93
Not interested on your Libertarian propoganda videos. Go away. stone space Oct 2016 #94
Right depends on interpretation. the 2a only applied to a militia if it was needed to secure a free Ohioblue22 Oct 2016 #100
It is rather clear that the Founders intended everyone to be "the militia" discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2016 #101
Parts of the Constitution don't go extinct hack89 Oct 2016 #104
The Second Amendment is not the issue. branford Oct 2016 #37
there is no false equivalence. gejohnston Oct 2016 #57
You make good points. deathrind Oct 2016 #83
Safe? Straw Man Oct 2016 #53
Good Lord! The product pumped bullet after bullet into child after child. stone space Oct 2016 #58
That was the individual that did that. beevul Oct 2016 #66
What is it you find funniest about children's bodies being pumped with bullets from an AR-15? stone space Oct 2016 #68
What is it you find honest about falsely attributing the source of my humor? beevul Oct 2016 #70
You chose a post about bullets being pumped into children and laughed. stone space Oct 2016 #84
The NRA was not a defendant in the Sandy Hook lawsuit branford Oct 2016 #87
Fuck the NRA, fuck the PLCAA, and fuck the NRA's sexual predator candidate. stone space Oct 2016 #88
You obviously missed the point of my entire post. branford Oct 2016 #90
It's the NRA that is trying to force a sexual predator on America. stone space Oct 2016 #92
You appear to be confusing the First and Second Amendment and branford Oct 2016 #95
Significant numbers of people disagree with the NRA on their support of sexual assault. stone space Oct 2016 #96
Uh-oh. Sounds like a clams casino moment. Eleanors38 Oct 2016 #115
Thats a very poor attempt at spin. Heres why. beevul Oct 2016 #102
Clearly you don't understand what "product liability" means. Straw Man Oct 2016 #108
re: :...your persistent distortion of logic is starting..." discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2016 #110
The small-caliber competition rifle that the Newtown shooter stole from his mother.... benEzra Oct 2016 #23
I *mostly* agree. branford Oct 2016 #38
Further wasted effort, distraction and pandering discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2016 #99
A little good news in these dark days... ileus Oct 2016 #103
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Dec 1969 #
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»"Connecticut Judge Dismis...»Reply #128