Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Fatal Cop Shooting Suspect Killed In Standoff [View all]Atypical Liberal
(5,412 posts)36. You really need to do some research.
I still maintain that the main contributing factors to the reduction in violent crime rates are gun control, better policing, and just for fun let's throw in better medical treatment.
You are completely wrong.
You really, really, need to go spend a couple of hours Googling "Violent Crime in the United States".
Violent crime in the US is now at it's lowest point in decades. Yet we currently have record numbers of firearms in circulation. The election of President Obama in 2008 sparked a massive spike in firearm and ammunition sales yet violent crime rates have continued to decline since then, as they were well before his election.
Since 1986 we have gone from virtually no states allowing concealed carry to now every state except one allowing it. We are also seeing more and more states passing "castle doctrine" style laws that remove the duty to retreat from victims of crime.
Now I will NOT make the case that the reason we are having reduced crime rates is because of more firearms. We can't make that case. But we can certainly make the case that more guns do not result in increased crime rates.
There have been many reasons proposed for the decreased crime rate. One of them is that the price of cocaine crashed from its high in the 1990s. Another is that the drug trade has more or less stabilized and matured, with less internal struggles in the distribution chains. Another is that, for good or ill, the United States has incarcerated huge swaths of the population in the age, sex, and race range most likely to be involved in violent crime (young black males). And because of this, that same swath of the population has been unable to procreate.
You are completely wrong.
You really, really, need to go spend a couple of hours Googling "Violent Crime in the United States".
Violent crime in the US is now at it's lowest point in decades. Yet we currently have record numbers of firearms in circulation. The election of President Obama in 2008 sparked a massive spike in firearm and ammunition sales yet violent crime rates have continued to decline since then, as they were well before his election.
Since 1986 we have gone from virtually no states allowing concealed carry to now every state except one allowing it. We are also seeing more and more states passing "castle doctrine" style laws that remove the duty to retreat from victims of crime.
Now I will NOT make the case that the reason we are having reduced crime rates is because of more firearms. We can't make that case. But we can certainly make the case that more guns do not result in increased crime rates.
There have been many reasons proposed for the decreased crime rate. One of them is that the price of cocaine crashed from its high in the 1990s. Another is that the drug trade has more or less stabilized and matured, with less internal struggles in the distribution chains. Another is that, for good or ill, the United States has incarcerated huge swaths of the population in the age, sex, and race range most likely to be involved in violent crime (young black males). And because of this, that same swath of the population has been unable to procreate.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hey...don't look at me...I'm not the one encouraging doing away with a failed system.
ellisonz
Dec 2011
#20
What you've overlooked in your moral entrepeneurship is the system hasn't failed.
friendly_iconoclast
Dec 2011
#21
But gun laws are far less restrictive than they were forty years ago- and there are far more guns...
friendly_iconoclast
Dec 2011
#25
I've refuted the basis of most of your studies which are narrowly constructed...
ellisonz
Dec 2011
#41
Hardly- the NICS is run by the FBI, who also run the national crime databases.
friendly_iconoclast
Dec 2011
#30
you referred to 'the defense of unlimited gun rights go unchallenged on this board'
aikoaiko
Dec 2011
#37
No, but all these accounts of satanic ritual abu..., err gun crimes
friendly_iconoclast
Dec 2011
#24