Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Straw Man

(6,624 posts)
3. Whose intent?
Wed Dec 9, 2020, 12:19 AM
Dec 2020

Last edited Wed Dec 9, 2020, 01:27 AM - Edit history (2)

Are guns made for the purpose of killing ?? Of course they are, when used for the purpose they were designed for, they kill, it's what they do......whether it's people or animals. That is undeniable. Your analogy falls apart under the slightest scrutiny. It's a silly argument.

It is not the intent of the gun makers that their products be used to commit murder. The threat of deadly force inherent in possession of a firearm can serve the purpose of self-defense even if no shot is fired. And if a shot is fired in legitimate self-defense, the death of an assailant may well save the life of a victim. Then there's hunting: Would you seek to abolish that as well?

Your formulation, were it followed to its logical conclusion, would bankrupt the entire firearms industry, which, I suspect, it the whole purpose: to accomplish in the civil courts that which the anti-gun movement has been unable to accomplish in the legislative arena.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Regarding the Protection ...»Reply #3