Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

PirateRo

(933 posts)

5. Oh, i read it

Reply to melm00se (Reply #3)

Sun Jan 31, 2021, 03:41 PM

Jan 2021

I have no problem with it. If fact, any reasonable person would have no problem with it. And if this serves to stop people of poor judgement from owning a weapon, then it fulfills my requirement for the law.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

HR 127 - DOA [View all] melm00se Jan 2021 OP

Hmm discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2021 #1

I have no problem with the bill for the same reason I don't have a problem with registering or... PirateRo Jan 2021 #2

I am going to guess you didn't read the propose bill. melm00se Jan 2021 #3

Oh, i read it PirateRo Jan 2021 #5

"(A)ny reasonable person" in this case means "agrees with me" friendly_iconoclast Feb 2021 #8

Hardly. I couldn't care less on agreement on this topic. PirateRo Feb 2021 #9

Again, you're using *your* standards as synonymous with 'reasonable'. Your schtick is not new, btw: friendly_iconoclast Feb 2021 #11

Yeah, no. PirateRo Feb 2021 #14

It's not new just because you personally haven't used it before friendly_iconoclast Feb 2021 #16

Oh, this has nothing to do with me PirateRo Feb 2021 #18

You offer little more than glittering generalities and superlatives in defense of HR 127 friendly_iconoclast Feb 2021 #19

In general, I support a vigorous debate of proposed restrictionist laws. discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2021 #20

I didn't read anything about... discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2021 #12

The antigun want to treat gun ownership the way the GOP treats voting friendly_iconoclast Feb 2021 #10

I've been toying with ideas for... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jan 2021 #4

Well, there goes 2022 krispos42 Jan 2021 #6

BTW, H.R. 125 was introduced on 4 January... discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2021 #7

What is the intended point of this insurance? ManiacJoe Feb 2021 #13

Registration discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2021 #15

Effectively an $800 poll tax on what *all* the Supremes have held to be an individual right friendly_iconoclast Feb 2021 #17

The bill, or subsequent law, is irrelevant. Rick Rolle Feb 2021 #21